Effect of Spatial and Temporal Prediction on Tactile Sensitivity.

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether spatial or temporal prediction of the tactile stimulus contributes to tactile sensitivity. To investigate the effect of spatial prediction on tactile sensitivity, electrical stimuli were provided for the digit nerve in one of five fingers, and advanced notice of the stimulating finger was provided before the stimulus in some trials but not in others. There was no significant effect of spatial prediction on the intensity at the perceptual threshold of the digit nerve stimulus. This indicates that spatial prediction of the tactile stimulus does not influence tactile sensitivity. To examine the effect of temporal prediction, an auditory warning cue was provided 0, 1, or 10 s before the electrical stimulus to the digit nerve. The stimulus intensity at the perceptual threshold in the trials with the 1 s warning cue was lower than those with the 0 s warning cue. This indicates that temporal prediction enhances tactile sensitivity. The stimulus intensity at the perceptual threshold in the trials with the 1 s warning cue was lower than those with the 10 s warning cue. This means that the contribution of temporal prediction to the tactile sensitivity is greater as the warning cue is closer to the time of the stimulus. This finding may be explained by a defense mechanism activated when humans predict that a tactile stimulus is coming soon.

Short-Term Reproduction of Active Movement with Visual Feedback and Passive Movement with a Therapist's Hands.

Reproducing instructed movements is crucial for practice in motor learning. In this study, we compared the short-term reproduction of active pelvis movements with visual feedback and passive movement with the therapist's hands in an upright stance. Sixteen healthy males (M age = 34.1; SD = 10.2 years) participated in this study. In one condition, healthy males maintained an upright stance while a physical therapist moved the participant's pelvis (passive movement instruction), and in a second condition, the participant actively moved their pelvis with visual feedback of the target and the online trajectory of the center of pressure (active movement instruction). Reproduction errors (displacement of the center of pressure in the medial-lateral axis) 10 s after the passive movement instruction were significantly greater than after the active movement instruction (p < 0.001), but this difference disappeared 30 s after the instruction (p = 0.118). Error of movement reproduction in the anterior-posterior axis after the passive movement instruction was significantly greater than after the active movement instruction, no matter how long the retention interval was between the instruction and reproduction phases (p = 0.025). Taken together, active pelvis movements with visual feedback, rather than passive movement with the therapist's hand, is better to be used for instructing pelvis movements.

Does Viewing Mirror-Reflected Body Image Affect Static and Dynamic Standing Balance?

In the present study, we examined the immediate effect of allowing healthy participants to view their mirror-reflected body image on static and dynamic balance. We placed a mirror to allow participants to frontally view their own body image while maintaining a quiet stance or while engaged in a dynamic postural standing task. On measures of body sway during quiet stance, there were no effects of this visual feedback, supporting the view that human beings have no central mechanism for viewing the mirror-reflected body image to control body sway during quiet stance. However, the body deviated forward during quiet stance while viewing the mirror-reflected body image, indicating that viewing the mirror-reflected body image contributed to the anterior-posterior positioning of the body, as mediated by an ankle control strategy. For the dynamic standing task, viewing the body image induced unstable peaks of rhythmic lateral shifting of the body weight over the feet. This indicates that viewing the body image caused unstable motor commands for rhythmic lateral weight shifting. When participants made a transition from a bipedal to a unipedal stance in response to a cue, viewing the body image shortened the onset latency of the body sway. Accordingly, viewing the body image seemed to accelerate the motor execution involved in lateral weight shifting, possibly due to predictive activation of the motor system before movement onset. Considered collectively, we found static and dynamic stance balance to be influenced by viewing one's mirror-reflected body image. Viewing the mirror-reflected body image may be a means of changing static and dynamic balance in patients with impaired postural control.

Descending motor command to prime mover of dependent finger induces tactile gating in target and distant non-target finger.

This study examined whether tactile gating induced by the descending motor command to one finger spreads out to the other fingers to which the command is not delivered and whether this gating is dependent on the target finger to which the command is delivered. The change in perceptual threshold to the digital nerve stimulation of one finger induced by tonic contraction of the first dorsal interosseous or abductor digiti minimi muscle was examined. The perceptual threshold to the digital nerve stimulation of the thumb or little finger was increased by tonic contraction of the abductor digiti minimi muscle. This finding indicates that the descending motor command to the prime mover of the little finger abduction induces tactile gating not only in the finger to which the command is delivered but also in the other finger to which the command is not delivered. Tonic contraction of the first dorsal interosseous muscle did not change the perceptual threshold to the digital nerve stimulation in any finger. This finding means that tactile gating occurs particularly when the descending motor command is delivered to the dependent finger. Spreading out of tactile gating of one finger, to which the descending motor command is not delivered, is likely mediated by surround inhibition.

Effect of Laterally Moving Tactile Stimuli to Sole on Anticipatory Postural Adjustment of Gait Initiation in Healthy Males.

This present study examined the effect of the laterally moving tactile stimuli (LMTS) to the sole on the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) of the gait initiation. Thirteen healthy males participated in this study. A sound cue was provided at the beginning of each trial. The participants took three steps forward from a quiet stance at their preferred time after the start cue. The LMTS were delivered to the sole after the start cue. The loci of the tactile stimuli moved from the left- to the right-most side of the sole and then moved from the right- to the left-most side of that in a stimuli cycle. The duration of one stimuli cycle was 960 ms, and this cycle was repeated 16 times in a trial. The APA did not onset at the specific direction or phase of the LMTS, indicating that they did not use any specific phase of the stimuli as a trigger for initiating the gait. The LMTS decreased the amplitude and increased the duration of the APA. Simultaneously, the LMTS increased the time between the APA onset and toe-off of the initial support leg, indicating that they moved slowly when initiating gait during the LMTS. Those findings are explained by the view that the suppression of the APA induced via the LMTS to the sole is caused by the slowing down of the gait initiation due to masking the tactile sensation of the sole.

Afferent volley from the digital nerve induces short-latency facilitation of perceptual sensitivity and primary sensory cortex excitability.

The present study examined whether the perceptual sensitivity and excitability of the primary sensory cortex are modulated by the afferent volley from the digital nerve of a conditioned finger within a short period of time. The perceptual threshold of an electrical stimulus to the index finger (test stimulus) was decreased by a conditioning stimulus to the index finger 4 or 6 ms before the test stimulus, or by a stimulus to the middle or ring finger 2 ms before that. This is explained by the view that the afferent volleys from the digital nerves of the fingers converge in the somatosensory areas, causing spatial summation of the afferent inputs through a small number of synaptic relays, leading to the facilitation of perceptual sensitivity. The N20 component of the somatosensory-evoked potential was facilitated by a conditioning stimulus to the middle finger 4 ms before a test stimulus or to the thumb 2 ms before the test stimulus. This is explained by the view that the afferent volley from the digital nerve of the finger adjacent to the tested finger induces lateral facilitation of the representation of the tested finger in the primary sensory cortex through a small number of synaptic relays.

Suppression of perceptual sensitivity to digital nerve stimulation induced by afferent volley from digital nerve of contralateral homologous finger.

The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether perceptual sensitivity to digital nerve stimulation is modulated by the afferent volley from the digital nerve of a contralateral finger. Fifteen healthy humans participated in this study. A test stimulus was given to the right-hand index finger, and a conditioning stimulus was given to one of the five fingers on the left hand 20, 30, or 40 ms before the test stimulus. The perceptual threshold of the finger stimulation was measured. The perceptual threshold of the test stimulus was significantly increased by a conditioning stimulus to the left-hand index finger given 40 ms before the test stimulus. In contrast, the threshold was not significantly changed by a conditioning stimulus to any finger other than the index finger. Perceptual sensitivity to digital nerve stimulation is suppressed by the afferent volley from the digital nerve of the contralateral homologous finger. This means that the afferent volley from the digital nerve suppresses the homologous finger representation in the ipsilateral somatosensory areas. These findings can be explained by the view that the afferent volley from the digital nerve of the index finger projects to the index finger representation in the contralateral primary sensory cortex and that the interhemispheric transcallosal inhibitory drive is provided from the secondary sensory cortex to the homologous finger representation in the contralateral secondary sensory cortex.

Advanced cueing of auditory stimulus to the head induces body sway in the direction opposite to the stimulus site during quiet stance in male participants.

Under certain conditions, a tactile stimulus to the head induces the movement of the head away from the stimulus, and this is thought to be caused by a defense mechanism. In this study, we tested our hypothesis that predicting the stimulus site of the head in a quiet stance activates the defense mechanism, causing a body to sway to keep the head away from the stimulus. Fourteen healthy male participants aged 31.2 ± 6.8 years participated in this study. A visual cue predicting the forthcoming stimulus site (forehead, left side of the head, right side of the head, or back of the head) was given. Four seconds after this cue, an auditory or electrical tactile stimulus was given at the site predicted by the cue. The cue predicting the tactile stimulus site of the head did not induce a body sway. The cue predicting the auditory stimulus to the back of the head induced a forward body sway, and the cue predicting the stimulus to the forehead induced a backward body sway. The cue predicting the auditory stimulus to the left side of the head induced a rightward body sway, and the cue predicting the stimulus to the right side of the head induced a leftward body sway. These findings support our hypothesis that predicting the auditory stimulus site of the head induces a body sway in a quiet stance to keep the head away from the stimulus. The right gastrocnemius muscle contributes to the control of the body sway in the anterior-posterior axis related to this defense mechanism.

Responses of stance leg muscles induced by support surface translation during gait.

This study determined the presence of the muscle responses to the support surface translation in the stance leg during gait and examined the effect of the direction and time point of the translation and that of the cognitive process on the responses. The rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in the stance leg were tested. There was no significant effect of cognitive process on the electromyographic (EMG) activity induced by the translation of the support surface. In all muscles except the SOL, the EMG amplitude increased 0-300 â€‹ms after the support surface translation at the initial stance (IS) or middle stance (MS) of the tested leg. This means that the EMG activity in the leg muscles other than the SOL occurs after the support surface translation at the IS or MS no matter the direction of the translation. The EMG amplitude was not changed after the translation at the late stance, indicating that the translation does not influence the EMG amplitude at the double limb support phase with the tested leg behind the other. In the SOL, the EMG amplitude increased after the backward translation at the IS and after the forward translation at the MS, but decreased after the forward translation at the IS, indicating that the support surface translation-induced change in the EMG amplitude of the SOL is dependent on its direction. The change in the EMG amplitude of the TA and RF induced by the forward translation was greatest when the translation was given at the IS. In the SOL, the decrease in the EMG amplitude after the forward translation and the increase in the amplitude after the backward translation were greatest at the IS. Taken together, the change in the EMG amplitude induced by the support surface translation is greatest when the translation is given at the IS. The increase in the EMG amplitude in the TA and RF after the forward translation was greater than that after the backward translation at the IS, indicating that the EMG activity of the frontal leg muscles after the forward translation is greater when the translation is given at the IS.

Contribution of vision and tactile sensation on body sway during quiet stance.

[Purpose] This study examines the contribution of vision and tactile sensation on body sway during quiet stance. [Participants and Methods] Sixteen healthy participants maintained quiet stance. The mean distance between the neutral center of pressure (COP) and that at the peak deviated position, indicating how quickly humans initiate the swaying of the body back to the neutral position, was calculated (COPpeak). [Results] The displacement of the COP in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes was greater when vision was occluded. The anterior or posterior COPpeak was also greater when vision was occluded. The leftward COPpeak was greater when the tactile sensation of the sole was masked. Visual occlusion decreased the tactile perception threshold of the sole. There was no significant interaction between the effect of vision and that of tactile sensation on body sway during quiet stance. [Conclusion] Vision plays a role in returning the body to the neutral position, particularly in the anterior-posterior axis. Tactile sensation contributes particularly to recovery from the leftward body sway during quiet stance. Tactile sensitivity is enhanced by visual occlusion through inter-modal reweighting. However, inter-modal reweighting between vision and tactile sensation is not specifically for postural control during quiet stance.

Tactile Perception of Right Middle Fingertip Suppresses Excitability of Motor Cortex Supplying Right First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle.

The present study examined whether tactile perception of the fingertip modulates excitability of the motor cortex supplying the intrinsic hand muscle and whether this modulation is specific to the fingertip stimulated and the muscle and hand tested. Tactile stimulation was given to one of the five fingertips in the left or right hand, and transcranial magnetic stimulation eliciting motor evoked potential in the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) or abductor digiti minimi was given 200 ms after the onset of tactile stimulation. The corticospinal excitability of the FDI at rest was suppressed by the tactile stimulation of the right middle fingertip, but such suppression was absent for the other fingers stimulated and for the other muscle or hand tested. The persistence and amplitude of the F-wave was not significantly influenced by tactile stimulation of the fingertip in the right hand. These findings indicate that tactile perception of the right middle fingertip suppresses excitability of the motor cortex supplying the right FDI at rest. The suppression of corticospinal excitability was absent during tonic contraction of the right FDI, indicating that the motor execution process interrupts the tactile perception-induced suppression of motor cortical excitability supplying the right FDI. These findings are in line with a view that the tactile perception of the right middle finger induces surround inhibition of the motor cortex supplying the prime mover of the finger neighboring the stimulated finger.

Sympathetic Response to Postural Perturbation in Stance.

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate whether the sympathetic response to perturbation in stance represents multiple mental responses, whether perturbation-induced fear of fall is one of the mental responses, and whether the sympathetic response is task specific. While healthy humans maintained stance, the support surface of the feet translated in the forward or backward direction. The phasic electrodermal response (EDR), representing the sympathetic response, appeared 1-1.5 s after the support surface translation. Mostly, perturbation-induced EDRs comprised one peak, but some EDRs were comprised of two peaks. The onset latency of the two-peak EDR was much shorter than that of the one-peak EDR. The second peak latency of the two-peak EDR was similar to the peak latency of the one-peak EDR, indicating that the first peak of the two-peak EDR was an additional component preceding the one-peak EDR. This finding supports a view that perturbation-induced EDR in stance sometimes represents multiple mental responses. The amplitude of the EDR had a positive and significant correlation with fear, indicating that perturbation-induced EDR in stance partially represents perturbation-induced fear of fall. The EDR amplitude was dependent on the translation amplitude and direction, indicating that perturbation-induced EDR in stance is a task specific response. The EDR appeared earlier when the participants prepared to answer a question or when the perturbation was self-triggered, indicating that adding cognitive load induces earlier perturbation-induced mental responses.

Influence of the Inter-Trial Interval, Movement Observation, and Hand Dominance on the Previous Trial Effect.

Previous studies have shown that current movement is influenced by the previous movement, which is known as the previous trial effect. In this study, we investigated the influence of the inter-trial interval, movement observation, and hand dominance on the previous trial effect of the non-target discrete movement. Right-handed healthy humans abducted the index finger in response to a start cue, and this task was repeated with constant inter-trial intervals. The absolute difference in the reaction time (RT) between the previous and current trials increased as the inter-trial interval increased. The absolute difference in RT reflects the reproducibility of the time taken for the motor execution between two consecutive trials. Thus, the finding supported the view that there is a carryover of movement information from one trial to the next, and that the underlying reproducibility of the RT between the two consecutive trials decays over time. This carryover of movement information is presumably conveyed by implicit short-term memory, which also decays within a short period of time. The correlation coefficient of the RT between the previous and current trials decreased with an increase in the inter-trial interval, indicating that the common responsiveness of two consecutive trials weakens over time. The absolute difference was smaller when the response was performed while observing finger movement, indicating that a carryover of the visual information to the next trial enhances the reproducibility of the motor execution process between consecutive trials. Hand dominance did not influence the absolute difference or correlation coefficient, indicating that the central process mediating previous trial effect of hand movement is not greatly lateralized.

Current Movement Follows Previous Nontarget Movement With Somatosensory Stimulation.

This study examined whether the current movement follows the previous movement and whether this process is enhanced by somatosensory stimulation or is gated while retrieving and using the memory of the previously practiced target end point. Healthy humans abducted the index finger to a previously practiced target (target movement) or abducted it freely without aiming at the target (nontarget movement). The end point of the nontarget movement had a positive correlation with the previous nontarget movement only when somatosensory stimulation was given during the previous movement, indicating that the current nontarget movement follows the previous nontarget movement with somatosensory stimulation. No conclusive evidence of whether this process is gated by retrieving and using the memory of the previously practiced target was found.

Supplementary motor area contributes to carrying previous movement information over to current movement.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the cortical areas contributing to the influence of the previous movement on the current movement. Right-handed healthy human participants abducted and then adducted the left index finger in response to a start cue. Twenty consecutive trials with 10 s intertrial intervals were performed in each trial block. An odd-numbered trial was considered to be the previous trial, and a trial immediately after the previous trial (even-numbered trial) was the current trial. In each trial block, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was given over one of the seven TMS sites with the start cue in the previous trial. The TMS site was over the supplementary motor area (SMA), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right dorsal premotor cortex, right or left posterior parietal cortex or right primary sensory cortex. Sham TMS, producing magnetic stimulation with the coil tilting 90 degrees off the scalp, was delivered over the Cz. In the current trial, TMS was not delivered. The correlation coefficient of the reaction time between the previous and current trials was positive and significant in the sham TMS trial block. This indicates that the current movement is partially dependent on the previous movement. The correlation coefficient of the reaction time between the previous and current movements in the SMA trial block was significantly different from that in the sham TMS trial block, indicating that the SMA contributes to the influence of the previous movement on the current movement. The SMA contributes to carrying the responsiveness level in the previous movement over to the current movement.

Cortical contribution to motor process before and after movement onset.

PURPOSE: This study determined the cortical areas contributing to the process of the reaction time (RT), movement time, onset-peak time, peak velocity and amplitude of the movement. METHODS: Eighteen healthy right-handed humans abducted the left index finger in response to a start cue with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). RESULTS: There was a significant and positive correlation coefficient between the peak velocity and amplitude, indicating that movement velocity increases with the size of the movement to maintain the consistent time taken for the movement. There was no significant correlation between the RT and movement time, and thus, hypothesis that those are under common motor process was not supported. The RT in the trials with TMS over the dorsal premotor cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, or posterior parietal cortex was significantly shorter than the RT in the trials with sham TMS, indicating that those areas contribute to the motor process in the RT. The onset-peak time in the trials with TMS over the posterior parietal cortex was significantly shorter than that in the trials with sham TMS, indicating that the posterior parietal cortex contributes to the motor process that determines the time taken for the acceleration phase of the movement. CONCLUSION: The findings support a view that the cortical areas both in front of and behind the primary motor cortex contribute to the motor process before the movement onset, but the areas behind the primary motor cortex particularly contributes to the motor process during the acceleration phase of the movement.

Rhythmic movement and rhythmic auditory cues enhance anticipatory postural adjustment of gait initiation.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rhythmic movements or cues enhance the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) of gait initiation. Healthy humans initiated gait in response to an auditory start cue (third cue). A first auditory cue was given 8 s before the start cue, and a second auditory cue was given 3 s before the start cue. The participants performed the rhythmic medio-lateral weight shift (ML-WS session), rhythmic anterior-posterior weight shift (AP-WS session), or rhythmic arm swing (arm swing session) in the time between the first and second cues. In the rhythmic cues session, rhythmic auditory cues with a frequency of 1 Hz were given in this time. In the stationary session, the participants maintained stationary stance in this time. The APA and initial step movement preceded by those rhythmic movements or cues were compared with those in the stationary session. The temporal characteristics of the initial step movement of the gait initiation were not changed by the rhythmic movements or cues. The medio-lateral displacement of the APA in the ML-WS and arm swing sessions was significantly greater than that in the stationary session. The anterior-posterior displacement of the APA in the rhythmic cues and arm swing sessions was significantly greater than that in the stationary session. Taken together, the rhythmic movements and cues enhance the APA of gait initiation. The present finding may be a clue or motive for the future investigation for using rhythmic movements or cues as the preparatory activity to enlarge the small APA of gait initiation in the patients with Parkinson's disease.

[Recent outcomes of vitreous surgery for diabetic retinopathy].

PURPOSE: To investigate background, surgical method, complications, prognosis, and prognostic factors in patients undergoing vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and forty eyes of 261 patients undergoing vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy in five recent years were studied regarding background, surgical method, complications, and visual prognosis. Factors influencing postoperative visual acuity and complications were also examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Final postoperative visual acuity (FPVA) improved in 226 eyes (66%). FPVA of 0.1 or better and 0.5 or better was achieved in 80% and 45% of all patients, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 89 eyes(26%). In the vitreous hemorrhage group, FPVA improved in 86%, and FPVA of 0.5 or better was achieved in 60%. Postoperative complications were most common in the traction detachment group and the percentage was 40%. Factors influencing FPVA were preoperative visual acuity, postoperative complications, indications for surgery, and preoperative severity. Factors influencing postoperative complications were patient background, preoperative visual acuity, preoperative severity, and iatrogenic breaks. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy is a useful method for diabetic retinopathy but postoperative complications must be managed.

[Vitrectomy for endophthalmitis after cataract surgery].

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors of poor visual outcome with vitrectomy for early-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical records of 29 consecutive eyes with endophthalmitis developing within 6 weeks after cataract surgery and that underwent therapeutic vitrectomy between June 1996 and April 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two of the eyes received intravitreal injections of vancomycin and ceftazidime at the time of vitrectomy, and all patients received intravenous antibiotics. Eyes were divided into two groups; group A consisted of 22 eyes with a final visual acuity of 0.2 or greater, and group B consisted of 7 eyes with a final visual acuity of less than 0.2. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes (52%) in group A achieved a visual acuity of 0.5 or better and 8(28%) achieved a visual acuity of 1.0, while 4 eyes in group B developed phthisis bulbi. For eyes with a preoperative visual acuity of hand motions or worse, there was no correlation between final visual acuity and preoperative visual acuity. The overall culture-positive rate was 57%. In group A, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was identified in 6 eyes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 3 eyes and enterococcus in 2 eyes. In group B, alpha-hemolytic streptococcus (AHS) was identified in 4 eyes, aspergillus in 1 eye, and MRSA in 1 eye. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin with the exception of the aspergillus. AHS infection appeared to be associated with wound failure from the initial cataract surgery and a poor visual outcome. Among 3 of the eyes that developed phthisis bulbi, intravitreal injection of antibiotics was not performed. CONCLUSION: Early vitrectomy and intravitreal injection of vancomycin may improve visual outcomes, but infection with AHS may be associated with cataract surgery wound failure and poor visual outcomes.