Real-world data on efficacy/safety and economic impact of nivolumab administered every 2 and 4 weeks among Japanese patients.

AIM: A new treatment interval for nivolumab administration at 480 mg every 4 weeks, in addition to 240 mg every 2 weeks, was approved in Japan in 2020. Using model-based evaluation, it was speculated that the effects or safety of nivolumab do not differ between the two treatment intervals; however, real-world data on nivolumab efficacy, safety, and economic impact are lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to examine the effects of nivolumab treatment intervals (2 weeks vs. 4 weeks) in terms of efficacy, safety, and economic impact in Japanese patients with cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients treated with nivolumab. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received nivolumab at 240 mg every 2 weeks (2-week group) or 480 mg every 4 weeks (4-week group). RESULTS: Efficacy results found no significant difference between the 4- and 2-week groups considering median overall survival (p = 0.70) and median progression-free survival (p = 0.57). The incidence of any grade and ≥  grade 3 immune-related adverse events did not differ between the 4-week and 2-week groups (any grade, p = 0.13; ≥  grade 3, p = 0.36). Excluding drug costs, the 4-week group had significantly lower medical costs than the 2-week group (2-week vs. 4-week: mean, 94,659 JPY [679.0 USD] vs. 58,737 JPY [421.3 USD]; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings suggest that nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks may be more effective than nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks in terms of economic impact.

Eosinophil may be a predictor of immune-related adverse events induced by different immune checkpoint inhibitor types: A retrospective multidisciplinary study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, biomarkers for irAEs common to different types of ICIs and cancers have not been reported. This study examined whether eosinophils can be used as a predictor of irAEs. METHODS: Six hundred fourteen patients with cancer (esophageal, gastric, head and neck, lung, melanoma, renal cell, urothelial, and other cancer) received anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 therapy. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they experienced irAEs (irAE group) or not (non-irAE group). Eosinophils were examined before the two-course treatment. RESULTS: Patients in the irAE group who received anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 therapy had higher eosinophils before the two-course treatment than those in the non-irAE group (p < 0.05). The eosinophils in the anti-PD-L1 therapy group tended to increase in the irAE group. Furthermore, eosinophils in gastric, head and neck, lung, melanoma, renal, and urothelial cancers were significantly higher in the irAE group than in the non-irAE group (p < 0.05). The optimal cutoff value for eosinophils against irAEs was 3.0% (area under the curve = 0.668). In multivariate analyses, eosinophils of ≥3.0% were an independent factor for irAEs (odds ratio: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.79-3.67). CONCLUSION: An increased eosinophil before the two-course treatment may be a predictor of irAEs in various cancers treated with different ICIs.

Hemoglobin and neutrophil levels stratified according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk predict the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarkers associated with the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab against advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 75 patients treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab at seven hospitals between August 2018 and April 2021. Prognostic biomarkers were assessed prior to initiating treatment with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of disease progression. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk factors most important for predicting disease progression were determined using classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: Median overall survival and progression-free survival were longer in the intermediate IMDC risk group than in the poor IMDC risk group (overall: not reached vs. 18.3 months; progression-free: not reached vs. 13.5 months). The multivariate analysis identified poor IMDC risk as a risk factor for disease progression (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-6.51). Based on the results of the classification and regression tree analysis, the cohort was divided into non-anemia, anemia + neutro-Low, and anemia + neutro-High groups. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were longer in the non-anemia and anemia + neutro-Low groups than in the anemia + neutro-High group (overall: not reached vs. 29.3 months vs. 4.3 months: progression-free: not reached vs. 29.0 months vs. 3.9 months). CONCLUSION: Hemoglobin and neutrophil levels may represent crucial biomarkers for predicting the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

GNRI Sustainability during One Cycle of First-Line Chemotherapy as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the prognostic value of a sustained high Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) during first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). METHODS: Between January 2018 and February 2022, 123 patients received platinum-based chemotherapy at Nagoya City University Hospital and affiliated institutions. Of these, 118 eligible patients who showed an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) between 0 and 2 were retrospectively examined. Based on body mass index and serum albumin levels, GNRI was calculated immediately before and after the first primary chemotherapy cycle. Patients were divided into two groups based on GNRI: GNRI sustained ≥92 in sustainable (n = 63) and GNRI <92 in unsustainable (n = 55) groups, respectively. Clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the two groups for age, gender, cycle of first-line treatment, and type of series of sequential treatments after failure of first-line therapy. Median overall survival from the start of first-line chemotherapy was 30.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.9-NA) for sustainable and 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-21.2) for unsustainable groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified ECOG-PS:2 and fatigue, an adverse event, as independent predictors of unsustainable GNRI transition (95% CI: 1.29-90.6, odds ratio [OR]: 10.8; 95% CI: 1.06-26.9, OR: 5.34, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sustaining a high level of GNRI was an important prognostic indicator in patients with mUC receiving first-line chemotherapy. Appropriate intervention for controlling adverse events, including fatigue, may enhance physical strength during cancer treatment.