ABSTRACT
Heat stress has an adverse impact on worker health and well-being, and the effects will increase with more frequent and severe heat events associated with global warming. Acclimatization to heat stress is widely considered to be a critical mitigation strategy and wet bulb globe temperature- (WBGT-) based occupational standards and guidelines contain adjustments for acclimatization. The purpose here was to 1) compare the mean values for the upper limit of the prescriptive zone (ULPZ, below which the rise in core temperature is minimal) between unacclimatized and acclimatized men and women; 2) demonstrate that the change in the occupational exposure limit (ΔOEL) due to acclimatization is independent of metabolic rate; 3) examine the relation between ΔOEL and body surface area (BSA); and 4) compare the exposure-response curves between unacclimatized and acclimatized populations. Empirically derived ULPZ data for unacclimatized participants from Pennsylvania State University (PSU) and acclimatized participants from University of South Florida (USF) were used to explore the difference between unacclimatized and acclimatized heat exposure limits. The findings provide support for a constant 3°C WBGT OEL decrease to account for unacclimatized workers. Body surface area explained part of the difference in ULPZ values between men and women. In addition, the pooled PSU and USF data provide insight into the distribution of individual values for the ULPZ among young, healthy unacclimatized and acclimatized populations in support of occupational heat stress guidelines.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Occupational exposure limit guidelines using wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) distinguish between acclimatized and unacclimatized workers with about a 3°C difference between them. For the first time, empirical data from two laboratories provide support for acclimatization state adjustments. Using a constant difference rather than increasing differences with metabolic rate better describes the limit for unacclimatized participants. Furthermore, the lower upper limit of the prescriptive zone (ULPZ) values set forth for women do not relate to fitness level but are partly explained by their smaller body surface area (BSA). An examination of individual ULPZ values suggests that many unacclimatized individuals should be able to sustain safe work at the exposure limit for acclimatized workers.
