Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
5.
Br J Cancer ; 113(6): 886-93, 2015 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have a better prognosis than those with HPV-negative tumours. There is interest in de-escalating their treatment but strategies are needed for risk stratification to identify subsets with a poor prognosis. This study investigated tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in relation to HPV tumour status and patient survival. METHODS: Biopsies from 218 patients diagnosed with OPSCC between 2002 and 2011, who underwent chemo/radiotherapy were analysed for HPV by PCR, in-situ hybridisation and p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC). One hundred and thirty-nine samples with concordant HPV detection were analysed for CD3, CD4, CD8 and FoxP3 expression in tumour and stromal regions using multiplexIHC and multispectral image analysis. Labelling of smooth muscle actin (SMA) identified activated stroma. RESULTS: Human papillomavirus-positive compared with HPV-negative OPSCC had higher infiltration in both tumour and stromal areas of CD4 and CD8 T cells but not FoxP3 T regulatory cells. Only CD3+CD8+ stromal and not tumour area infiltration was associated with increased survival (P=0.02). There was significantly higher SMA expression in HPV-positive compared with -negative tumours, which did not correlate with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Studies of TILs for risk stratification in OPSCC should assess stromal infiltration.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/immunology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/immunology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Actins/analysis , Antigens, Neoplasm/analysis , Biopsy , CD3 Complex/analysis , CD4 Antigens/analysis , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8 Antigens/analysis , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Forkhead Transcription Factors/analysis , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology , Muscle, Smooth/chemistry , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oropharynx/immunology , Oropharynx/pathology , Prognosis
6.
Br J Cancer ; 111(3): 437-43, 2014 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24937673

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The addition of carbogen and nicotinamide (CON) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival in invasive bladder cancer. We explored whether expression of the hypoxia marker hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) alone or in combination with other markers predicted benefit from CON. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out using material from patients with high-grade invasive bladder carcinoma enrolled in the BCON phase III trial of RT alone or with CON (RT+CON). HIF-1α expression was studied in 137 tumours using tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry. Data were available from other studies for carbonic anhydrase IX and glucose transporter 1 protein and gene expression and tumour necrosis. RESULTS: Patients with high HIF-1α expression had improved 5-year local relapse-free survival with RT+CON (47%) compared with RT alone (21%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.8, P=0.02), no benefit was seen with low HIF-1α expression (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43-1.50, P=0.5). Combinations of markers including necrosis also predicted benefit but did not improve on prediction using necrosis alone. CONCLUSIONS: HIF-1α may be used to predict benefit from CON in patients with bladder cancer but does not improve on use of necrosis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/metabolism , Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/metabolism , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/metabolism , Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy , Cell Hypoxia , Chemoradiotherapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
7.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 25(11): 630-8, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23916365

ABSTRACT

AIMS: There is an increasing incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC) mostly associated with favourable outcomes. p16 immunohistochemistry is a surrogate marker for HPV positivity in OPSCC. The prognostic strength of p16 over traditional prognostic factors is not fully characterised. In this study, we evaluated the clinical and demographic differences between p16-positive and -negative OPSCC and characterised its prognostic strength versus traditional prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks and clinical information from 217 OPSCC patients, treated with radiotherapy (alone or in combination with other therapies) between 2000 and 2010 were collected retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry for p16 protein was carried out; cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and locoregional control (LRC) were calculated for both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Ninety-two per cent of the OPSCC originated from tonsil and tongue base sites, 61% were p16 positive. Patients with p16-positive OPSCC were younger (P < 0.0001), with lower alcohol (P = 0.0002) and tobacco (P = 0.0001) exposure. The tumours were less differentiated (P = 0.0069), had a lower T stage (P = 0.0027), higher nodal status (P = 0.014) and higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognostic group (P = 0.0036). AJCC prognostic group was significant for RFS (P = 0.0096) and CSS (P = 0.018) in patients with p16-negative OPSCC, but not those with p16-positive tumours (P = 0.30 and 0.54). Other significant factors for CSS and RFS in univariate analysis were: pretreatment haemoglobin (P < 0.0001 and <0.0001), chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.005 and 0.03) and P16 status (P < 0.0001 and 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, p16 positivity was the strongest independent prognostic variable for both CSS, RFS and LRC (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio 4.15; 95% confidence interval 2.43-7.08), (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio 6.15; 95% confidence interval 3.57-10.61) and (P = 0.001, hazard ratio 3.74; confidence interval 1.76-7.95). CONCLUSION: This study shows that p16 is the single most important prognostic variable in OPSCC, surpassing traditional prognostic factors for both CSS and RFS. Furthermore, disease stage has no prognostic significance in p16-positive patients, highlighting the need for routine p16 assessment in OPSCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/virology , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...