ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about possible differences in advance directive completion (ADC) based on ethnicity and language preference among Chinese Americans on a regional level. OBJECTIVE: To understand the association of ethnicity and language preference with ADC among Chinese Americans. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis with direct standardization. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 31,498 Chinese and 502,991 non-Hispanic White members enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California during the entire study period between 2013 and 2017 who were 55 or older as of January 1, 2018. MAIN MEASURES: We compared the proportion of ADC among non-Hispanic White and Chinese patients, and also analyzed the rates according to language preference within the Chinese population. We calculated ADC rates with direct standardization using covariates previously found in literature to be significant predictors of ADC such as age and utilization. KEY RESULTS: Among Chinese members, 60% preferred English, 16% preferred another language without needing an interpreter, and 23% needed an interpreter. After standardizing for age and utilization, non-Hispanic Whites were more than twice as likely to have ADC as Chinese members (20.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 20.5-20.7%) vs. 10.0% (95% CI: 9.6-10.3%), respectively). Among Chinese members, there was an inverse association between preference for a language other than English and ADC (13.3% (95% CI: 12.8-13.8%) if preferring English, 6.1% (95% CI: 5.4-6.7%) if preferring non-English language but not needing an interpreter, and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.6-5.6%) if preferring non-English language and needing an interpreter). CONCLUSIONS: Chinese members are less likely to have ADC relative to non-Hispanic White members, and those preferring a language other than English are most affected. Further studies can assess reasons for lower ADC among Chinese members, differences in other Asian American populations, and interventions to reduce differences among Chinese members especially among those preferring a language other than English.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Ethnicity , Humans , Advance Directives , Hispanic or Latino , Language , Retrospective Studies , White , AsianABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To understand (1) the association of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status among hospitalized patients and (2) the association of MDD and hospitalization outcomes among DNR patients. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample data from 2009 to 2013 for patients >18 years. To address the first objective, we used multivariable logistic regression among all hospitalized patients to compute the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of having DNR status if patients have active MDD of varying severities after controlling for age, sex, race, suicidal ideation, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. To address the second objective, we used multivariable regression among patients with DNR status to compute aOR of having hospitalization outcomes such as increased length of stay, higher total charges, leaving against medical advice, and mortality if patients have MDD. RESULTS: Among all hospitalizations, 2.3% had DNR status. There was an inverse association between severity of MDD and having DNR status. Relative to those without MDD, patients with moderate recurrent MDD episode (aOR 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.85) and severe recurrent MDD episode (aOR of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.37-0.48)) were significantly less likely to have DNR status. Among DNR patients, those with all severities of MDD except mild single episode MDD were >40% less likely to die during hospitalization. Among DNR patients, patients with MDD had 0.7 day longer length of stay, and >$4,500 higher total charges. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Patients are less likely to have DNR status if they have active MDD. Among patients with DNR status, those with MDD are less likely to die during hospitalization than those without MDD. With current practice, depression is not associated with increased likelihood of death due to foregoing resuscitation prematurely, though the exact mechanisms of these findings need further investigation.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Resuscitation Orders , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The United States has a growing opioid epidemic impacting all aspects of health care including orthopaedic surgery. Septic arthritis of the knee is a condition commonly encountered by orthopaedic surgeons related to opioid and injection drug use (IDU). Changes in the frequency of hospitalizations for IDU-related septic arthritis and differences in septic arthritis patient outcomes according to IDU status in the setting of the burgeoning opioid epidemic are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of patients with septic arthritis of the knee use injection drugs? (2) Are there any differences in complications, reoperations, length of stay, and leaving against medical advice among patients with septic arthritis of the knee with and without IDU? (3) What are the age and racial trends in IDU-related septic arthritis of the knee from 2000 to 2013? METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample database of years 2000 to 2013 was utilized for patients between ages 15 and 64 years with a principal discharge diagnosis of native septic arthritis of the lower leg, the vast majority of which represents the knee. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is the largest publicly available healthcare database in the United States that can show nationally representative clinical trends and outcomes. Septic arthritis was classified as related or unrelated to IDU based on previously published algorithms using billing codes. Patients with IDU-related septic arthritis were more likely to be black or Hispanic, younger, and use Medicare, Medicaid, or self-payment as their primary payment method. The yearly proportion of patients with septic arthritis who used injection drugs was determined. Hospitalization outcomes including length of stay, leaving against medical advice, number of procedures, and mortality rates were compared after adjusting for age, gender, and race in multivariable regression analyses. The yearly change in proportion of IDU-related septic arthritis in each age, race, and gender group was compared over the study period. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with IDU-related septic arthritis increased from 5% in 2000 to 11% in 2013. After adjusting for age, gender, and race, patients with IDU-related septic arthritis were more likely to die during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-5.39; p < 0.001) and undergo repeat arthroscopic (AOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.45; p = 0.007) or open irrigation and débridement (AOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.28-2.19; p < 0.001). Patients with IDU-related septic arthritis were more likely to leave against medical advice (AOR, 7.13; 95% CI, 5.56-9.15; p < 0.001) and also had an additional 5 days in length of stay (95% CI, 4.1-5.5; p < 0.001) on average compared with patients with septic arthritis unrelated to IDU. There was an increasing proportion of patients with IDU-related septic arthritis who were aged 15 to 34 years and 55 to 64 years from 2000 to 2013. CONCLUSIONS: IDU is increasingly the cause of septic knee admissions and is associated with higher rates of mortality, reoperations, resource utilization, and leaving against medical advice. Orthopaedic surgeons must adequately screen for IDU among patients with septic arthritis and monitor them closely for reoperation with a low threshold to reaspirate a knee in the postoperative period. Future studies should determine the current use and potential benefits of a multidisciplinary approach, including addiction specialists, to aid in the management of the increasing number of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.