Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block combined with sciatic nerve block as an anesthetic technique for hindfoot and ankle surgery: A prospective, randomized noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: A femoral nerve block (FNB) in combination with a sciatic nerve block (SNB) is commonly used for anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle surgery. The effects of FNB on motor function, related fall risk, and rehabilitation are controversial. An adductor canal block (ACB) potentially spares motor fibers in the femoral nerve, but the comparative effect on hindfoot and ankle surgeries between the 2 approaches is not yet well defined. We hypothesized that compared to FNB, ACB would cause less weakness in the quadriceps and produce similar pain scores during and after the operation. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for hindfoot and ankle surgeries (arthroscopy, Achilles tendon surgery, or medial ankle surgery) were stratified randomized for each surgery to receive an FNB (FNB group) or an ACB (ACB group) combined with an SNB. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at each stage. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength, time profiles (duration of the block procedure, time to full anesthesia and time to full recovery), patients' analgesic requirements, satisfaction, and complications related to peripheral nerve blocks such as falls, neurologic symptoms, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity were evaluated. The primary outcome was tested for the noninferiority of ACB to FNB, and the other outcomes were tested for the superiority of each variable between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients received an ACB and 29 received an FNB. The VAS pain scores of the ACB group were not inferior during and after the operation compared to those of the FNB group. At 30 minutes and 2 hours after anesthesia, patients who received an ACB had significantly higher average dynamometer readings than those who received a FNB (34.2 ±â€Š20.4 and 30.4 ±â€Š23.7 vs 1.7 ±â€Š3.7 and 2.3 ±â€Š7.4, respectively), and the results were similar at 24 and 48 hours after anesthesia. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to time profiles and patient satisfaction. No complications were noted. CONCLUSION: ACB preserved quadriceps muscle strength better than FNB, without a significant difference in postoperative pain. Therefore, ACB may be a good alternative to FNB for reducing the potential fall risk.

Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway during propofol anesthesia: A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil can improve insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during induction with propofol. Recently, it has been suggested that there is a sex difference in opioid requirements for this procedure. The purposes of this study were to determine the effective effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil for the facilitation of LMA insertion in male and female patients during propofol anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade and to evaluate whether there are sex differences in the Ce of remifentanil required for successful LMA insertion. METHODS: Forty-eight patients (24 male, 24 female) with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2, aged 20 to 60 years, scheduled for minor orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced by target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil. The target Ce of propofol was 5 µg/mL initially and was reduced to 3.5 µg/mL after loss of consciousness. The Ce of remifentanil given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using 0.5 ng/mL as a step size. The 1st patient was tested at a Ce of 3.0 ng/mL of remifentanil. Successful LMA insertion was defined as smooth insertion without patient movement or significant resistance to mouth opening. RESULTS: The effective Ce of remifentanil required for successful LMA insertion on 50% of occasions (effective effect-site concentration for 50% [EC50]) as estimated by Dixon method was significantly lower in women (2.18 ±â€Š0.35 ng/mL) than in men (2.82 ±â€Š0.53 ng/mL) (P = 0.02). Using the isotonic regression method, the effective Ce of remifentanil required for successful LMA insertion on 95% of occasions (EC95) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was significantly lower in women (3.38 [3.0-3.48] ng/mL) than in men (3.94 [3.80-3.98] ng/mL). CONCLUSION: The Ce of remifentanil required to facilitate successful LMA insertion is higher during propofol induction by TCI in men than in women. When using remifentanil for LMA insertion, patient sex should be taken into account for appropriate dosing.

Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus-Intercostal Plane Block and Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block After Single-Incision Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-incision transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy (START) requires substantial tissue disruption, which produces moderate-to-severe pain in the axilla and neck areas during the early postoperative period. This study aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided serratus-intercostal plane blocks and intermediate cervical plexus blocks (CPBs) on the early postoperative pain after START. METHODS: We randomized 22 patients to undergo either ultrasound-guided serratus-intercostal plane and intermediate CPBs (the block group, n = 11) or to not undergo any block (the control group, n = 11). We compared postoperative axillary pain, postoperative neck pain, and analgesic use between the groups during the first 24 hours. The rescue analgesics were intravenous fentanyl (0.5 µg/kg) in the postanesthesia care unit, and intravenous ketorolac tromethamine (30 mg) in the general ward. RESULTS: The block group showed consistently lower pain scores than the control group in the axillary area in the first 24 hours and in the neck area only in the first 3 hours after surgery. The numbers (proportions) of patients who required analgesics were 11 (100%) in the control group and 6 (54.5%) in the block group during the first 24 hours (P = 0.035). No adverse effect was observed related to the peripheral nerve blocks. CONCLUSIONS: After START, a serratus-intercostal plane block performed at the level of the third rib was an effective analgesic technique for axillary pain; however, the clinical effectiveness of intermediate CPB for neck pain may be limited.