ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug mortality risks vary among industries, creating distinctive geographic patterns across US counties. However, less is known about how local labor market structure relates to drug overdose mortality amid the synthetic opioid era in the United States. This study investigates the relationship between industry-specific job composition and drug overdose mortality at the county level while exploring how fentanyl's presence in illicit drug supplies may moderate the relationship. METHODS: Data were derived from the National Center for Health Statistics' Multiple Cause of Death files for the rates of drug overdose mortality of any intent, linked with four other sources on industry-specific job shares, drug supply, and county-level sociodemographic characteristics and opioid prescribing rates from the US Census Bureau, the CDC, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Negative binomial regression models were employed to examine associations between county industry-specific job composition and drug overdose mortality, with tests for moderating effects of state-level fentanyl seizure rates. RESULTS: Our models indicate negative associations between job shares of manufacturing, retail trade, and educational services industries and drug overdose mortality. Positive associations were found for arts/entertainment/recreation and public administration. State-level fentanyl seizure rates had moderating effects on administrative/support/waste management/remediation (A/S/WM/R) and educational services. CONCLUSION: Counties with a higher concentration of arts/entertainment/recreation and public administration jobs need targeted efforts to mitigate drug-related overdose risks. Additionally, areas with higher concentrations of A/S/WM/R service jobs, particularly where fentanyl seizure rates are higher, may require proactive harm reduction strategies for reducing overdose risks.
Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Fentanyl , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Drug Overdose/mortality , Fentanyl/poisoning , Female , Analgesics, Opioid/poisoning , Adult , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Male , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Illicit Drugs/poisoningABSTRACT
Objectives. To test the associations between local employment opportunities for the Black workforce and drug mortality among Black Americans, while examining the potential moderating effects of fentanyl seizure rates. Methods. We derived data from the National Center for Health Statistics' restricted-access Multiple Cause of Death file, linked with county-level job counts, drug supply, and other characteristics from the US Census Bureau and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. After examining the characteristics of counties by the magnitudes of increases in drug mortality from 2010â2013 to 2018-2021, we conducted a first-differenced regression analysis to test the associations between the job-to-Black workforce ratio and age-adjusted drug mortality rates among Black Americans in US counties and test the moderating effects of state-level fentanyl seizure rates. Results. One more job per 100 Black workers was associated with 0.29 fewer drug overdose deaths per 100 000 Black Americans in the county. This negative association was stronger in the counties of the states with higher increases in fentanyl seizure rates. Conclusions. Increasing employment opportunities can be an important strategy for preventing Black Americans' drug mortality, especially among those living in areas with higher increases in fentanyl seizure rates. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(7):729-732. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307646).
Subject(s)
Black or African American , Employment , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Drug Overdose/mortality , Drug Overdose/ethnology , Fentanyl/poisoning , Male , Female , Adult , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Leveraging law enforcement drug seizure data to better respond to the overdose crisis requires an understanding of available evidence and knowledge gaps regarding relationships between drug seizures and overdose mortality. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review summarized peer-reviewed literature on associations between law enforcement drug seizures and drug-related mortality in the United States (US) in the era of illicitly-manufactured fentanyl, comparing study data sources, measures, methodologies, settings, and findings. METHODS: We identified 388 non-duplicate records from three online databases searched on May 23, 2023. After title/abstract and full-text screening by two independent reviewers, 14 studies met the criteria for inclusion. The included studies tested the association between a measure related to law enforcement drug seizures and an overdose mortality outcome in the US and were published in English, in peer-reviewed journals, during or after 2013. RESULTS: Four of 14 studies (29%) included data from the entire US, while the remaining studies focused on an individual state/city/county or a group of states/cities/counties. Synthetic opioid/fentanyl seizures represented the most frequently examined drug seizure category, and overdose deaths overall (involving any drugs) represented the most frequently examined outcome. Most studies used counts/rates of drug seizures, with fewer studies examining dosage/weight, drug combinations, the proportion of drug seizures involving a specific drug, or spatiotemporal distribution. The majority (86%) of studies reported at least one statistically significant positive association between a law enforcement drug seizure measure and an overdose mortality outcome, most consistently for fentanyl-related seizures. Results were relatively less consistent for seizures involving stimulants and other drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Studies in this review provided consistent evidence that fentanyl-related seizure measures are positively associated with overdose mortality outcomes, despite the limitations inherent in drug seizure data, even in the absence of available information regarding seizure weight or dosage.
Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Law Enforcement , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Fentanyl/adverse effects , North Carolina , Seizures/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data science approaches have increasingly been used in behavioral health research and may be useful for addressing social factors contributing to disparities in health status. This study evaluated the importance of cultural stress-related factors in classifying depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among adult survivors (N = 319) of Hurricane Maria who migrated from Puerto Rico to the United States mainland. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of random forests (RF) and logistic regression (LR) for classifying PTSD and depression. Models included demographic, hurricane exposure, and migration-related cultural stress variables. We inspected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, balanced accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and specificity. RESULTS: Negative context of reception and language-related stressors were moderately important for accurately classifying depression and PTSD. For classifying depression, RF showed higher accuracy, balanced accuracy, specificity, precision, and F1. For classifying PTSD, RF showed higher accuracy, specificity, precision, and F1. LIMITATIONS: A more thorough classification model would also include biomarkers (e.g., of allostatic load), family, community, or neighborhood-level attributes. Findings may not generalize to other groups who have experienced crisis-related migration. CONCLUSIONS: Findings underscore the importance of culturally and linguistically appropriate and trauma-informed clinical services for recent migrants. Use of assessments to identify pre-migration and post-migration stressors could inform clinical practice with migrants presenting with behavioral health-related difficulties.
Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Depression/diagnosis , Machine Learning , SurvivorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although homelessness is a well-documented risk factor for drug overdose at the individual level, less is known about state-level homelessness and overdose mortality in the United States (US). METHODS: This study used 2007-2020 panel data for all US states and the District of Columbia, from the following sources: US Department of Housing and Urban Development (homelessness data); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (drug overdose death counts, population estimates, and opioid prescribing rates); Bureau of Labor Statistics (unemployment rates); and the National Forensic Laboratory Information System (drug seizure data). Two-way (state and year) fixed effects models regressed log-transformed drug overdose mortality rates on homelessness prevalence, in nested models adding demographic composition and unemployment measures, as well as drug supply measures. Models were weighted by state population size, and standard errors (SEs) were clustered at the state level. RESULTS: Homelessness prevalence was significantly and positively associated with rates of drug overdose mortality after adjusting for nationwide trends, time-invariant differences between states, demographic composition, and unemployment rates (b[SE]=0.98[0.36], p=0.009). The positive association between homelessness prevalence and overdose mortality was attenuated at higher levels of fentanyl availability (fentanyl involvement in drug seizures; interaction term b[SE]=-0.02[0.01], p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The positive association between state-level homelessness and drug overdose mortality suggests that policies and programs to prevent and reduce homelessness represent fundamental elements of a comprehensive response to the US overdose crisis.
Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Ill-Housed Persons , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Fentanyl , District of ColumbiaABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Minority stress theory suggests that sexual minorities would be, on average, less likely than heterosexual individuals to seek out substance use treatment (due to concerns of stigma and rejection). However, prior research on the subject is mixed, and largely dated. In light of historic increases in societal acceptance and legal protections for sexual minorities, the field needs an up-to-date assessment of treatment utilization among this population. METHODS: This study used data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to examine the association between key independent variables (sexual identity, gender) and substance use treatment utilization using binary logistic regression. We conducted analyses using a sample of adults with a past-year substance use disorder (N = 21,926). RESULTS: Controlling for demographic factors, with heterosexual individuals as the comparison group, gay/lesbian individuals (AOR = 2.12, CI = 1.19-3.77) were significantly more likely and bisexual individuals (AOR = 0.49, CI = 0.24-1.00) significantly less likely to report treatment utilization. Bisexual individuals were also less likely than gay/lesbian individuals to report treatment utilization (AOR = 0.10, CI = 0.05-0.23). Interaction tests examining sexual orientation and gender showed no difference in treatment utilization between gay men and lesbian women, and revealed that bisexual identity was associated with decreased likelihood of treatment utilization for men (p = .004) but not for women. CONCLUSION: Sexual orientation, particularly in the context of social identity, plays a significant role in substance use treatment utilization. Bisexual men face unique barriers to treatment, which is concerning given the high rates of substance use among this and other sexual minority populations.
Subject(s)
Homosexuality, Female , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Sexual Behavior , HeterosexualityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug testing is widely implemented as a work-based prevention strategy for employee substance use. However, it has raised concerns about its potential use as a punitive measure in the workplace where racialized/ethnic workers are over-represented. This study examines the rates of exposure to workplace drug testing among ethnoracial workers in the United States and the potential differences in the employers' responses to positive test results. METHODS: A nationally-representative sample of 121,988 employed adults was examined using the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data. The rates of exposure to workplace drug testing were estimated separately for ethnoracial workers. Then we used multinomial logistic regression to test differences in employers' responses to the first positive drug test results across ethnoracial subgroups. RESULTS: Since 2002, Black workers reported 15-20% points higher rates of having a workplace drug testing policy than Hispanic or White workers. When tested positive for drug use, Black and Hispanic workers were more likely to be fired than White workers. When tested positive, Black workers were more likely to be referred to treatment/counseling services while Hispanic workers were less likely to be referred compared to White workers. CONCLUSION: Black workers' disproportionate exposure to drug testing and punitive responses in the workplace may potentially place individuals with substance use problems out of the workforce, limiting their access to treatment/other resources available via their workplaces. Also, Hispanic workers' limited accessibility to treatment and counseling services when tested positive for drug use requires attention to address unmet needs.
Subject(s)
Racism , Substance Abuse Detection , Workplace , Adult , Humans , Black or African American , Hispanic or Latino , Policy , Substance Abuse Detection/ethics , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States , WhiteABSTRACT
Intergenerational transmission of child abuse (hereinafter referred to as ITCA) has been continuously reported. Supportive relations with others have also been discussed as a protective factor to prevent this cycle. However, research has mainly investigated supportive adult and peer relationships formed in childhood, with little discussion of the impact of supportive partner relationships formed after becoming an adult. This study examined whether empathetic communication (hereinafter referred to as TSL: "Thanks, Sorry, and Love") attenuates the transmission of married women's child abuse experiences to subsequent generations mediated by intimate partner violence (hereinafter referred to as IPV). TSL is a communication strategy that promotes positive communication between intimate partners. We expected TSL to promote positive communication between couples through a process of self-transformation. Data from 1,122 married women were obtained from a nation-wide survey conducted in South Korea. All the survey respondents lived with partners and their own children simultaneously. For this study, structural equation model multigroup analysis was conducted to determine whether the pathways would be attenuated by TSL levels, showing that a high level of TSL communication attenuated the ITCA mediated by IPV. However, this process was maintained in the low-level TSL group. TSL is thus a protective factor against the ITCA. The findings suggest that healing processes can occur not only through childhood relationships but also through those formed after adulthood. Ultimately, to help victims recover, it is necessary to expand communication programs such as TSL that help victims learn how to express their feelings through healthy relationships with their partners.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Intimate Partner Violence , Adult , Child , Humans , Female , Love , CommunicationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite their growing popularity, the extent and nature of workplace alcohol and other drug (AOD) policy and support services in the United States remain unclear. The present study examined the availability of AOD policies and support services in workplaces. Also, the associations between a combination of these workplace measures and the current AOD consumption (focusing on binge drinking, use of marijuana and other illicit drugs, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs) were assessed. METHODS: Pooled Data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) were utilized to examine a nationally representative sample of 131,751 employed adults. First, the rates of those who reported having a written AOD policy at their workplaces among the total sample and subpopulations across socioeconomic status, and those who reported an employee assistance program or other counseling services for substance use problems were estimated. Then the associations between a combination of the two workplace measures and individuals' current AOD consumption were tested using multinomial logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Although 77.2% of employed individuals reported having a written AOD policy at their workplaces, only 50% of the sample had access to support services for substance use problems. The limited access to support services was most notable among traditionally disadvantaged groups (e.g., females, Hispanics, and individuals with limited English proficiency). The models suggest that having both a workplace AOD policy and support services was associated with significantly lower rates of marijuana and other illicit drug use compared to having neither of the two measures or only support services. CONCLUSION: Regardless of workplace AOD policies, the limited availability of support services, especially for disadvantaged workers, raises concerns. While further investigation is needed to understand the effectiveness of the comprehensive prevention approaches at workplaces, it is also important to advocate for the potential benefits of having employee assistance or other services available along with AOD policies.
Subject(s)
Cannabis , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Female , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Workplace , Alcohol Drinking , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Public PolicyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This systematic review summarized published literature on county-level predictors of drug overdose mortality in the United States (US). METHODS: Peer-reviewed studies and doctoral dissertations published in English between 1990 and July 19, 2022 were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EconLit. Eligible studies examined at least one county-level predictor of drug overdose mortality in US counties. Two reviewers independently completed screening, quality assessment (with an adapted National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool), and data extraction. Results were qualitatively summarized and grouped by predictor categories. RESULTS: Of 56 studies included, 42.9% were subnational, and 53.6% were limited to opioid overdose. In multiple studies, measures related to opioid prescribing, illness/disability, economic distress, mining employment, incarceration, family distress, and single-parent families were positively associated with drug overdose mortality outcomes, while measures related to cannabis dispensaries, substance use treatment, social capital, and family households were negatively associated with drug overdose mortality outcomes. Both positive and negative associations were documented for smoking, uninsurance, healthcare professional shortage status, physicians per capita, unemployment, income, poverty, educational attainment, racial composition, and rurality. Findings within studies also differed by subpopulation (by race/ethnicity, gender, age, or rurality) and the type of drugs involved in overdose. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review provide relatively mixed evidence regarding many county-level predictors of overdose mortality, several of which also vary between subpopulations, supporting the importance of additional research to elucidate pathways through which the county context may shape risk of fatal overdose.
Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , United States , Analgesics, Opioid , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , EthnicityABSTRACT
We aimed at examining whether county-level economic changes were associated with changes in county-level drug mortality rates since the Great Recession and whether the association is equally distributed across major sociodemographic subgroups. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (2004-2019), combined with census data, we conducted fixed effects analyses by including county-level economic changes as primary exposures and county-level drug-related mortality rates (per 100,000 people) from 2004-2007 (i.e., prior to the recession) to 2008-2011, 2012-2015, and 2016-2019 as an outcome variable based on 1833 counties. Our findings showed that drug mortality rates increased from 13.9 (2004-2007) to 16.0 (2008-2011), 18.0 (2012-2015), and 23.0 (2016-2019). Counties experiencing smaller median household income growth during and/or after the recession were associated with greater increase in drug mortality than counties experiencing larger median household income growth among the total population and all sociodemographic subgroups. Counties experiencing larger increases in unemployment rates and percentage of vacant housing units were associated with greater increase in drug mortality than counties experiencing smaller or no increase in unemployment rates and percentage of vacant housing units among certain sociodemographic subgroups. Findings suggest the importance of local economic contexts in understanding drug mortality risk since the recession. Drug overdose prevention polices need to be formulated by taking local economic changes following a major recession into consideration.
Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Unemployment , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Income , Economic Recession , MortalityABSTRACT
Drug injection represents a major health problem in the US, with severe health consequences including the transmission of blood-borne infections. An examination of the most recent trends in drug injection is warranted by the fast-evolving drug epidemic and recent policy changes such as the federal funding ban on needle exchange programs. This research examines current drug injection trends, patterns, and socioeconomic and behavioral profiles of people who inject drugs (PWID). Data were derived from the 2002 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). After examining the annual prevalence of drug injection since 2002, a latent class analysis was conducted to identify drug injection and other substance misuse patterns among PWID using the latest (2015-2019) NSDUH datasets. Associations between class membership and behavioral health comorbidities and treatment receipt were also assessed. The drug injection prevalence among US adults aged 18-64 increased from 0.21% in 2002/2004 to 0.36% in 2017/2019. Three distinctive groups were identified: the heroin injection group (45.2%), the methamphetamine injection group (28.0%), and the multi-drug injection group (26.8%). The methamphetamine injection group reported greater risks of experiencing serious psychological distress, suicidality, and limited substance use treatment. Special attention is needed for those who primarily injected methamphetamine. Programs to promote harm reduction and increase access to addiction treatment need to be expanded in at-risk communities while accounting for their distinct socioeconomic and drug use/misuse profiles.
Subject(s)
Drug Users , HIV Infections , Methamphetamine , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Drug Users/psychology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/psychology , Risk-Taking , Needle-Exchange Programs , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , HIV Infections/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Despite the persistent and elevated risks of prescription drug misuse (PDM) among parenting mothers in the United States, few population-based studies of this phenomenon have been conducted. To address this gap, the present study examined the latest PDM trends and patterns among parenting mothers and assessed their behavioral health comorbidities and treatment utilization. METHOD: Data were derived from a nationally representative U.S. sample of parenting mothers recruited for the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. After examining PDM trends since 2015, we conducted a latent class analysis to identify distinctive PDM patterns among mothers reporting past-year PDM (n = 3,042). Associations between class membership and behavioral health comorbidities/treatment receipt were tested. RESULTS: We found increasing PDM trends among unmarried Hispanic mothers since 2015, whereas no notable changes were observed for other racial/ethnic groups. Of the mothers reporting past-year PDM, nearly 50% were likely to misuse prescription stimulants with alcohol/marijuana (17.9%) or multiple prescription drugs (31.7%). Specifically, the Poly-Prescription Drug Misuse group reported greater risks of illicit drug use and mental disorders than the Prescription Opioids Misuse group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that special attention is needed for PDM among unmarried Hispanic (for recent increasing trends) and White (for persistently higher rates) mothers as well as mothers misusing multiple prescription drugs. Their distinctive PDM patterns as well as heightened behavioral health comorbidities and low treatment receipt suggest the need for a screening and treatment referral system that addresses the unique treatment needs and barriers facing parenting mothers.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants , Illicit Drugs , Opioid-Related Disorders , Prescription Drug Misuse , Prescription Drugs , Substance-Related Disorders , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Humans , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Objective: This report aims to identify US mutual help group (MHG) participants' psycho-socio-behavioral profiles. Method: We used data from the 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health and the sample included 1022 adults with past-year substance use disorders (SUD). We conducted a latent class analysis to identify subgroups of MHG participants and estimated multinomial logistic regression models to examine the associations between sociodemographic/intrapersonal characteristics and class membership. Results: Analyses identified three latent classes. Class 1 (Low-Risk group, 54%) reported low risks in all correlates except for serious psychological distress (SPD, 33%). Class 2 (Psychological Distress group, 30%) demonstrated high risks of major depressive episodes (86%) and SPD (93%). Class 3 (Criminal Justice System Involvement group, 16%) showed high involvement in arrests (100%) and drug-related arrests (67%) and moderate risks for SPD (54%) and behavioral problems, e.g., drug selling (46%) and theft (35%). Compared to Class 1, Class 2 was more likely to be female, out of the labor force, and to show high risk propensity, and Class 3 was more likely to have lower education and drug use disorders. Class 3 was also less likely to be older, belong to the "other" racial/ethnic category, have lower English proficiency, and report alcohol use disorder. Conclusions: The three subgroups of the US MHG participant population illustrate the complex and heterogeneous psycho-social-behavioral profiles of MHG participants with SUD. MHG referral's effectiveness may be augmented by tailoring it to the patient/client's specific psycho-socio-behavioral profile.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Depressive Disorder, Major , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Latent Class AnalysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study examined whether socioeconomic inequalities account for Black/White disparities in: (a) the prevalence of potential risk factors for overdose among adults using cocaine; and (b) national mortality rates for cocaine-involved overdose. METHODS: Data from 2162 Non-Hispanic (NH) Black or White adults (26 +) who reported past-year cocaine use in the 2015-2019 National Survey of Drug Use and Health were analyzed to obtain predicted probabilities of potential overdose risk factors by race and sex, using marginal effects via regression analyses, adjusting for age and socioeconomic indicators. Next, National Center for Health Statistics data (for 47,184 NH Black or White adults [26 +] who died of cocaine-involved overdose between 2015 and 2019) were used to calculate cocaine-involved overdose mortality rates by race and sex across age and educational levels. RESULTS: Several potential overdose vulnerabilities were disproportionately observed among NH Black adults who reported past-year cocaine use: poor/fair overall health; cocaine use disorder; more days of cocaine use yearly; hypertension (for women); and arrests (for men). Adjusting for age and socioeconomic indicators attenuated or eliminated many of these racial differences, although predicted days of cocaine use per year (for men) and cocaine use disorder (for women) remained higher in NH Black than White adults. Cocaine-involved overdose mortality rates were highest in the lowest educational strata of both races; nonetheless, Black/White disparities were observed even at the highest level of education, especially for adults ages 50 + . CONCLUSION: Age and socioeconomic characteristics may account for some, yet not all, of Black/White disparities in vulnerability to cocaine-involved overdose.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cocaine , Adult , Black People , Ethnicity , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mutual-help groups (MHGs) are an integral component of the substance use disorder (SUD) treatment system in the U.S., and growing evidence suggests that they are effective and cost-effective for SUD-related problems. However, not much is known about the MHG participation patterns in the U.S. METHODS: Using the 2002-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data, we estimated the annual participation rates and examined the psycho-social-behavioral correlates of MHG participation using logistic regression. RESULTS: There was no significant linear trend of MHG participation in the total US adult population between 2002 and 2018 (AOR = 0.999, 95% CI = 0.991-1.007). Among adults with past-year SUD, 4.8-7.4% of men and 4.4-6.7% of women participated in MHGs. MHG participants were more likely to be middle-aged (vs. young adults), lower education (less than high school, high school, some college vs. college or higher), lower income (annual household income <$20,000, $20,000-39,999 vs. $75,000 + ), be unemployed or not in the labor force (vs. employed), and were less likely to be Black/African American (vs. White American) and have lower English proficiency (speak English not well/not at all vs. very well/well),. CONCLUSION: MHG participation rates have remained relatively stable over the past two decades. MHGs were utilized more by individuals with lower socioeconomic status indicators and more criminal/legal involvement, possibly due to MHGs' free accessibility. However, research is needed to understand why young adults, Black, and individuals with lower English proficiency are somewhat less likely to attend MHGs.
Subject(s)
Substance-Related Disorders , Educational Status , Employment , Female , Humans , Income , Male , Middle Aged , Racial Groups , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
Despite the adverse effects of substance use on health among individuals with preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD), little is known about trends and correlates for substance use among individuals with CVD. We examined trends of use in tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis among US adults with heart disease. Using nationally representative data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N = 7339), we conducted survey-adjusted logistic regression analyses to test the significance of trends in substance use while controlling for sociodemographic factors and related correlates. Results showed that the prevalence of cannabis use among adults with a heart condition significantly increased. Notably, the prevalence of cannabis use increased by 91% among non-Hispanic Whites, while the increasing trends were not present among other racial/ethnic groups. Our results also showed that increase in cannabis use was associated with easier access, lower disapproval, and risk perceptions of cannabis. Special attention is needed to raise awareness of the risk associated with cannabis use among individuals with CVD and the implementation of an early screening and treatment strategy among those with CVD.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Ethnicity , Humans , Prevalence , Racial Groups , Sociodemographic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Studies on criminal behaviors largely focus on youth and younger adults. While criminal engagement declines with age, the aging population and significant costs associated with older offenders warrant their increased clinical and research attention. The present study utilizes data from the 2002 to 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to estimate the prevalence and explore the sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of criminal behavior in adults aged 50 years and older. The overall prevalence of older adults engaging in criminal behaviors during this time was approximately 1.20%. There was no significant difference in crime involvement between adults aged 50 to 64 years and 65 years and older. Older individuals who committed crimes were more likely to be male and Black and earning low income. Criminality was also associated with use of illicit substances and depression as well as receipt of mental health treatment.
Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Aged , Crime , Criminal Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , ViolenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Prior research examining alcohol use using national data has often overlooked vital heterogeneity among Hispanics, especially that related to language dominance and gender. We examine the prevalence of alcohol abstinence and-given prior research suggesting that many Spanish dominant Hispanics do not drink-examine rates of binge drinking among past-year alcohol users with a focus on the intersections of language and gender among Hispanics, while drawing comparisons with non-Hispanic (NH) White and NH Black adults. METHODS: Drawing from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health-a nationally representative survey between 2002 and 2018-we examine the year-by-year prevalence of alcohol abstinence and binge drinking among adults ages 18 and older in the United States. RESULTS: A disproportionate number of Spanish-dominant Hispanics abstain from alcohol use (54%), with particularly high levels of alcohol abstinence observed among Spanish dominant women (men: 39%, women: 67%). The prevalence of alcohol abstinence among English-dominant Hispanic men (24%) and women (32%) is far lower, approximating that of NH Whites (men: 23%, women: 32%). Importantly, however, among Spanish-dominant drinkers, the prevalence of binge drinking (men: 52%, women: 33%) is comparable to or greater than NH Whites (men: 42%, women: 32%). Binge drinking levels among English-dominant Hispanic men (50%) and women (37%) are greater than among their NH White counterparts. CONCLUSION: Findings paint a complex picture; consistent with prior research, we see that many Hispanics abstain from alcohol, but we also see new evidence underscoring that-among Hispanic drinkers-the prevalence of binge drinking is disconcertingly elevated.
Subject(s)
Binge Drinking , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol Abstinence , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Binge Drinking/epidemiology , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Language , Male , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Mothers who had a nonmarital birth experience multiple risk factors for depression, including housing instability. Yet, important questions remain about the extent of long-term housing instability and its association with future depression among at-risk mothers. Using the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study data, we examine cumulative housing instability over a 15-year period following nonmarital birth and its association with maternal depression. Based on a sample of 2279 mothers who had a nonmarital birth in 20 major US cities between 1998-2000, we examined their 15-year residential moves and housing arrangements. Then, we tested the associations between the cumulative residential moves and major depressive episodes (MDE) in Year 15 using logistic regression analysis. One in every four mothers had six or more residential moves in 15 years following a nonmarital birth. For each additional move, mothers reported up to 27.9% higher odds of having a past-year MDE in Year 15, translating into the prevalence increases from 6.0% (zero move) to 20.6% (10 moves). Our findings suggest that greater attention should be paid to housing needs among mothers following a nonmarital birth, including temporary housing assistance and more fundamental programs to reduce housing instability as preventive mental health services.