Concomitant Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Ipsilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Is It Safe?

PURPOSE: Symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with advanced ipsilateral glenohumeral arthritis requiring total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) may be easily overlooked. Even when diagnosed beforehand, most upper extremity surgeons have historically chosen to perform TSA and carpal tunnel release (CTR) separately. We hypothesized that combined single-stage TSA and CTR is feasible and yields results comparable with those when the 2 procedures are performed separately, while avoiding 2 surgeries. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent single-stage primary TSA and ipsilateral CTR between 2015 and 2019. The shoulder outcomes included pain, range of motion, and validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaires: Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) and Penn Shoulder Score. The CTR outcomes included pain, grip, pinch, VR-12, shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. The time to the initiation of rehabilitation and complications were also analyzed. The comparison group consisted of patients who underwent independent TSA or CTR during the same period. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent concomitant TSA and CTR, 248 underwent isolated TSA, and 154 underwent isolated CTR. The shoulder outcomes of patients who underwent the combined procedure were similar to those of patients who underwent isolated TSA in terms of pain, range of motion, general QoL (VR-12), and shoulder-specific QoL (Penn Shoulder Score). The outcomes of patients who underwent the combined procedure were similar to those of patients who underwent isolated CTR in terms of pain, grip and pinch, general QoL (VR-12), QuickDASH, and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. The time to the initiation of rehabilitation was also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant CTR and TSA are feasible. The functional outcomes and QoL of patients who underwent the concomitant treatment were comparable with those of patients who underwent the 2 procedures separately. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Prolonged Operative Time Associated with Increased Healthcare Utilization after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Intra-Articular and Extra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: An Analysis of 17,482 Cases.

Background The current literature does not contain a quantitative description of the associations between operative time and adverse outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radial fractures (DRF). Questions/Purpose We aimed to quantify associations between DRF ORIF operative time and 1) 30-day postoperative health care utilization and 2) the incidence of local wound complications. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for DRF ORIF cases (January 2012-December 2018). A total of 17,482 cases were identified. Primary outcomes included health care utilization (length of stay [LOS], discharge dispositions, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations) per operative-time category. Secondary outcome was incidence of wound complications per operative-time category. Multivariate regression was conducted to determine operative-time categories associated with increased risk while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and fracture type. Spline regression models were constructed to visualize associations. Results The 121 to 140-minute category was associated with significantly higher risk of a LOS > 2 days (odds ration [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.1-2.45; p = 0.014) and nonhome discharge (OR: 1.72; 95% CI:1.09-2.72; p = 0.02) versus 41 to 60-minute category. The ≥ 180-minute category exhibited highest odds of LOS > 2 days (OR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.33-3.26; p = 0.001), nonhome discharge disposition (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.05-3.33; p = 0.035), and 30-day reoperation occurrence (OR: 3.52; 95% CI: 1.59-7.79; p = 0.002). There was no association between operative time and 30-day readmission ( p > 0.05 each). Higher odds of any-wound complication was first detected at 81 to 100-minute category (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.08-8.4; p = 0.035) and peaked ≥ 181 minutes (OR: 9.62; 95% CI: 2.57-36.0; p = 0.001). Spline regression demonstrated no increase in risk of adverse outcomes if operative times were 50 minutes or less. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that prolonged operative time is correlated with increased odds of health care utilization and wound complications after DRF ORIF. Operative times greater than 60 minutes seem to carry higher odds of postoperative complications.

Malpractice Litigation in Hand Surgery: A Comprehensive Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The circumstances surrounding claims against hand surgeons have not been elucidated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in malpractice litigation regarding hand surgery through a nationwide legal database. METHODS: The Westlaw legal research database was queried for verdicts and settlements between 1985 and 2017 for hand surgery-related malpractice cases. Cases were included if the hand surgeon was sued for malpractice. Procedure type and complications and/or adverse events that resulted in litigation were recorded. Patient characteristics, state, date of case, case outcomes, and indemnity payment were also noted. All dollar amounts were adjusted to 2017 values using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: In all, 171 cases (35 states) were included. The most frequently litigated surgeries were carpal tunnel releases followed by fracture treatment. Nerve injury was the predominant cause of litigation. The median nerve was predominantly injured, followed by the ulnar and radial nerves. In fracture surgery, malunion was the predominant cause, followed by weakness, nerve injury, and infection. In total, 72.5% of cases yielded verdicts in favor of the defense, 21.6% favored the plaintiff, and 5.9% were settled. Indemnity varied between $7800 and $8.99 million, averaging $570,397 for cases when the jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. Settled cases averaged $1,140,527. CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice litigation has substantial financial implications on surgeons and the health care system. Litigation arises most commonly from routine procedures (carpal tunnel release and fracture fixation) rather than complex surgical cases, potentially due to the high variability in operating surgeon subspecialization, with discrepant training.

Dynamic Brachial Artery Entrapment After Distal Biceps Repair: A Case Report.

CASE: A 57-year-old man presented with paleness and coolness of the hand with elbow flexion 4 months after primary distal biceps repair. Diagnosis of dynamic brachial artery entrapment was confirmed with ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography. During revision surgery, the brachial artery was identified traveling underneath the repaired distal biceps tendon. After revision surgery, the patient made a full recovery with no residual symptoms. CONCLUSION: Adverse vascular events have been rarely reported in distal biceps repairs. Before and immediately after repair, the path of the tendon should be critically evaluated to ensure neurovascular structures were not placed under the repaired tendon.

Mental health of orthopaedic trauma patients during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been associated with reports of increased anxiety, depression and fear among the general population. People with underlying psychiatric disorders are more susceptible to stress than the general population. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of concomitant psychiatric conditions in the orthopaedic trauma population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated orthopaedic trauma patients who received care at our institution between February through April of 2019 and February through April of 2020. Patient sex, age, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, fracture location, tobacco use, employment status, mental health diagnosis and presence of interpersonal violence were documented. Mental health diagnoses were defined based on International Classification of Diseases-10 classification. RESULTS: The study included 553 orthopaedic patients evaluated at our institution during the defined time period. Patients in the 2020 cohort had a higher prevalence of mental health diagnoses (26% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001) compared with the 2019 group. The odds ratio for mental health disorder in the 2020 patients was 2.21 (95% CI 1.54, 3.18) compared with the 2019 cohort. The 2020 cohort had a higher percentage of patients who reported interpersonal violence (20% vs. 11%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study showed a higher prevalence of psychiatric disease among orthopaedic trauma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with those seen during the same time of the year in 2019. Stress induced by the coronavirus pandemic can place patients with mental illness at a higher risk for perilous behaviours and subsequent fractures.

Treatment of an Abscess of the Leg in a Febrile Child After Incidental Trauma from the Barb of a Freshwater Fish: A Case Report.

CASE: A 9-year-old boy suffered incidental trauma to the anterolateral leg from the barb of a freshwater fish. Within a few days of injury, the patient developed a fever and a deep abscess despite empiric antibiotic therapy. The underlying pathogen was Edwardsiella tarda. This study is the first report of such an abscess in a child, and similar reported cases have in adults have been associated with high rates of mortality. CONCLUSION: Penetrating soft-tissue trauma in association with an aquatic environment requires prompt evaluation. Empiric antibiotic regimens effective against terrestrial cellulitis may lack adequate gram-negative coverage for aquatically related injuries.

Correction to: Removal of a urinary catheter before discontinuation of epidural analgesia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention and hospital episode costs in patients undergoing surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The spelling of Erin Ohliger's name was incorrect.

Effectiveness of the saline load test in diagnosis of simulated traumatic ankle arthrotomies.

BACKGROUND: Limited studies have been conducted to determine the minimum amount and sensitivity of the saline load test of the ankle. Prior studies, only performed in arthroscopic models, have suggested a wide range of volumes necessary to confirm arthrotomy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of fluid required and the sensitivity of the saline load test to identify an intra-articular arthrotomy of the ankle. Using cadavers without prior ankle trauma or surgeries we aim to assess volume needed to detect ankle arthrotomies at varying arthrotomy locations. We hypothesized that the volume needed would vary based on site of arthrotomy. METHODS: Twenty thawed, fresh-frozen below knee cadavers were divided into four groups based on arthrotomy location. An ankle arthrotomy was made using a 4 mm trochar at the four standard ankle portal sites; anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral. To confirm intra-articular location, a arthroscope was inserted for direct visualization of the ankle joint. An 18-gauge needle was then inserted into the ankle joint, and saline mixed with methylene blue was injected. During the injection, the known arthrotomy site was viewed for extravasation. Amount of saline required to diagnose arthrotomy was recorded. All injections were confirmed as intra-articular by demonstrating methylene blue staining of the anterior joint. RESULTS: The saline volume required to achieve extravasation ranged from 3 mL to 11 mL. The mean saline volume required to achieve extravasation was 5.3 mL. A total of 8 mL was required to achieve 90% sensitivity, 10 mL for 95% sensitivity and 11 mL for 99% sensitivity. For the anterolateral, anteromedial, posteromedial, and posterolateral arthrotomy sites the mean saline volume needed to detect a traumatic arthrotomy was 5.2 mL, 6.2 mL, 5 mL, and 4.8 mL respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in volume needed to detect arthrotomies across all four locations (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: In this cadaveric model, an injection of 10 mL identified 95% of arthrotomies approximately 4 mm in size. No difference in volume needed to detect extravasation was found across all four arthrotomy locations. Prior studies performed in arthroscopic models with patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy may overestimate volume needed to detect arthrotomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Removal of a urinary catheter before discontinuation of epidural analgesia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention and hospital episode costs in patients undergoing surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVES: In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF), we aimed to answer these questions: (1) is there a difference in postoperative urinary retention (UR) rates among patients who had removal of their Foley catheters before vs. after discontinuation of epidural analgesia (EA)? (2) Can the timing of Foley catheter removal be an independent risk factor for postoperative UR requiring recatheterization? (3) Is there an incurred cost related to treating UR? STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. BACKGROUND: EA has been widely used for postoperative pain control after PSIF for AIS. In these patients, removing the Foley catheter, inserted for intraoperative monitoring of urine output, is indicated in the early postoperative period. However, a controversy exists as to whether it should be removed before or after the EA has been discontinued. METHODS: A single-institution, longitudinally maintained database was queried to identify 297 patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient characteristics and the order and timing of removing the urinary and epidural catheters were collected. Rates of UR were statistically compared in patients who had early vs. late urinary catheter removal. A univariate and multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors. Hospital episode costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients who had early (n = 66, 22%) vs. late (n = 231, 78%) urinary catheter removal had a significantly higher incidence of UR requiring recatheterization (15 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.007). Patient with early removal were almost 4 times more likely to develop UR requiring recatheterization [odds ratio (OR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-9.7, p = 0.005]. UR incurred additional costs averaging $15,000/patient (p = 0.204). CONCLUSION: In patients who had PSIF for AIS, removal of a urinary catheter before discontinuation of EA is an independent risk factor for UR, requiring recatheterization and associated with increased cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Current Concepts in Osteoarthritis of the Ankle: Review.

Ankle osteoarthritis constitutes a large burden to society and is a leading cause of chronic disability in the United States. Most commonly, it is post-traumatic, occurs in younger individuals, and is associated with obesity. This entity presents similarly to osteoarthritis of the other joints, with the typical nonspecific symptoms of stiffness, swelling, and pain. Radiographic investigation includes four weight-bearing standard views: antero-posterior and lateral foot, mortise view of the ankle, and a specialized view of the hindfoot. In this review, we covered epidemiology, anatomy and biomechanics, etiology, pathology, differential diagnoses, symptoms, physical examination, appropriate radiological investigation, as well as current treatment options and algorithms. Non-operative treatment options include weight loss, physical therapy, bracing, orthoses, pharmacologic treatments, corticosteroid injections, viscosupplementation, and biologic modalities. Viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid has the most evidence-based support and has been shown to be safe and efficacious. For patients who have moderate to severe disease, surgery may be indicated. However, current surgical options are either associated with high rates of complications or restrict ankle range of motion (ROM). Early stages of the ankle osteoarthritis should be treated with the above-mentioned non-surgical methods, and once the disease progresses, surgical options can be utilized.