ABSTRACT
AIMS: Biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents are thought to be safer than durable polymer-based stents. However, the long-term vascular response remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility of durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting (SES) and everolimus-eluting (EES) stents with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting (BES) stents in a porcine coronary model. Stents were implanted in porcine coronaries. Acetylcholine challenge tests and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination were performed at one month. Animals were sacrificed at three and six months (n=6 each), and the stents were analysed histologically. At one month, acetylcholine challenge tests revealed a trend towards greatest vasoconstriction in SES, less in BES, and least in EES, but the differences were not significant. OCT analysis demonstrated the highest incidence of uncovered struts in SES, followed by BES, while EES showed almost complete strut coverage (41.7±27.0%, 24.5±23.8%, 0.4±0.8%, respectively; p=0.004). Upon histological analysis at three months, SES showed a significantly higher inflammatory score than BES and EES (2.9±1.4, 0.8±0.9, 0.5±0.4, respectively; p=0.001), and this was maintained at six months (1.6±1.5, 0.3±0.3, 0.4±0.6, respectively; p=0.049). While SES showed an increased inflammatory reaction, EES and BES showed minimal inflammation. These results indicate that the late inflammatory reaction does not necessarily depend on degradability of the polymer, if the combination of the drug, metal, and polymer is biocompatible.
Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Drug-Eluting Stents , Acetylcholine/pharmacology , Animals , Coronary Angiography , Everolimus , Inflammation/pathology , Materials Testing , Models, Animal , Neointima/pathology , Polymers , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Swine , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Vasodilator Agents/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the tissue components of in-stent restenosis (ISR) might differ between drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) and that these differences could be distinguished by qualitative and quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-two initial ISR lesions (sirolimus-eluting stents: n=28; paclitaxel-eluting stents: n=51; BMS: n=43) were evaluated with OCT. Based on their OCT appearance, the lesions were classified as homogeneous, layered or heterogeneous. The optical properties of backscatter, attenuation and signal intensity of the neointimal tissue (NIT) were quantified. To evaluate the vascular response after balloon angioplasty (BA), the rate of reduction of the NIT area (NITA) was calculated (NITA before - after BA/NITA before BA at the minimum lumen cross-sectional area). Among the morphologic OCT patterns, the layered type was predominant with DES, whereas lesions were homogeneous with BMS (P<0.001). Backscatter and signal intensity were significantly higher with BMS (P<0.05 and P<0.001 respectively). The NITA reduction rate was significantly greater in the layered and heterogeneous groups than in the homogeneous group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The morphologic OCT patterns of the NIT in ISR differed significantly between DES and BMS, probably reflecting pathologic differences. Layered and heterogeneous tissues might respond better than homogeneous tissue to simple balloon dilatation, suggesting a possible direction for OCT-based ISR treatment strategies.