ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of thoracic epidural analgesia as part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multimodal analgesic protocol in patients with gynecologic oncology who have undergone laparotomy for suspected or confirmed malignancy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study, following an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway, among patients who had undergone laparotomy for confirmed or suspected gynecological malignancy between January 2020 and September 2021. All patients who underwent laparotomy at the gynecologic oncology department for the aforementioned reason during that time were considered eligible. Patients (n=217) were divided into two groups: epidural (n=118) and non-epidural (n=99) group. Both groups were treated with the standard ERAS departmental analgesic protocol. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay, complications, and readmission rates. RESULTS: Data from 217 patients (epidural group, n=118 vs non-epidural group, n=99) with median age of 61 years (IQR 53-68) were analyzed. The most common type of cancer was of ovarian origin (85/217, 39.2%, p=0.055) and median (Aletti) surgical complexity score was 3 (p=0.42). No differences were observed in the patients' demographics, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Primarily, median length of stay was 4 days in both groups with statistically significant lower IQR in the epidural group (3-5 vs 4-5, p=0.021). Complication rates were more common in the non-epidural group (38/99, 38.3% vs 36/118, 30.5%, p<0.001) with similar rates of grade III (p=0.51) and IV (0%) complications and readmission rates (p=0.51) between the two groups. Secondarily, the epidural group showed lower pain scores (p<0.001) on the day of surgery and in the first post-operative day (p<0.001), higher mobilization rates on the day of surgery (94.1% vs 57.6%, p<0.001), faster removal of urinary catheter (p<0.001), shorter time to flatus (p<0.001), and less nausea on the day of surgery (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study we showed that thoracic epidural analgesia, when used as part of an ERAS protocol, is safe and offers more favorable pain relief along with a number of additional benefits, improving the peri-operative experience of patients with gynecologic cancer.
Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Genital Neoplasms, Female , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Analgesics , Length of Stay , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
Objective The aim of this study is to present our experience and evaluate the safety and outcomes of the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in obese patients who underwent surgery for suspected or confirmed gynecological malignancies. Method From January 2020 to September 2021, 217 patients underwent laparotomy for a confirmed or suspected gynecological malignancy following a 19-element ERAS pathway. The patients were divided into two groups: obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n = 104) and non-obese (BMI < 30, n = 113). Both groups were treated with a 19-element ERAS protocol. Results After dividing the 217 patients into two groups, significantly more comorbidities were observed in the obese group (diabetes mellitus: 23% vs. 8%, p = 0.004; ASA score grade 3: 25.0% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001), as well as higher rates of endometrial cancer (51.9% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001) compared to the non-obese group. The overall ERAS compliance rates when matched element by element were similar. Postoperatively, complication rates of all grades were significantly higher in the obese group (46.1% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.001) without differences in the length of stay, readmission, and reoperation rates. Conclusion In this retrospective study, we showed that obese gynecological oncology patients can be safely managed with ERAS protocols perioperatively while potentially minimizing the adverse outcomes in these otherwise high-risk patients.
ABSTRACT
The presence of ascites is a common clinical presentation in gynecologic oncology patients. Hemorrhagic ascites (HA) due to endometriosis is a rare presentation that can be easily misdiagnosed as ovarian malignancies. The present study aims to update the currently available knowledge on the characteristics of patients presenting with HA due to endometriosis. A systematic search was conducted for articles published from January 2000 to July 2020 using the Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases along with the references of the full-text articles retrieved. Papers describing cases of women over 18 years with or without previous history of endometriosis were assessed. Only cases with histologically proven hemorrhagic ascites of endometriosis origin were included. Twenty-nine studies (27 case reports and two case series) comprising 32 patients were evaluated. The mean patients' age was 32 years, while six of the patients had a previous history of endometriosis. The mean amount of drained ascitic fluid was 4,200 mL, whereas three patients underwent thoracentesis due to pleural effusions. The treatment options included not only medical but also surgical therapies. Fertility preservation was achieved in 27 patients, while two of them achieved pregnancy with in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. Endometriosis-related hemorrhagic ascites is a relatively rare expression of the disease. Endometriosis-related hemorrhagic ascites should be considered in the differential diagnosis (DD) of women with ascites and clinical suspicion of endometriosis. The available literature is limited to case reports and case series and thus indicates further research in the field to decode the pathophysiology of the disease and decide on the optimal treatment.
ABSTRACT
Advances in modern medicine have allowed patients with early stage cervical cancer (stages Ia - IIai) to preserve their fertility with oncologic efficacy comparable to previous radical treatments. A variety of conservative-fertility sparing procedures, also known as Fertility Sparing Surgeries (FSS) have been proposed. The present review aimed to provide the current evidence on obstetric outcomes and the prematurity rates as well as to discuss the management modalities of these high-risk pregnancies. Our review of the literature included 3042 women with early cervical cancer, of whom 2838 underwent FSS (204 excluded for oncologic reasons). Almost half of these patients attempted to become pregnant and about two thirds of them achieved at least one pregnancy either spontaneously or with the help of Assisted Reproduction Technologies. Data revealed that 63.9% of these pregnancies resulted in live births, whereas 37.6% of them were preterm. The main cause of preterm births in this subpopulation is the postoperative cervical length restriction that consequently leads to cervical incompetence and ascending infections that eventually lead to (clinical or subclinical) chorioamnionitis. Radical operations such as ART, VRT and MIRT presented with higher prematurity rates. The lack of standardized protocols for the management of pregnancies after FSS precluded reaching to firm results with regards to the efficacy of them in achieving favourable obstetrical outcomes. Further large volume studies are warranted with the intent to acquire standardized guidelines for pregnancies achieved after FSS for early stage cervical cancer.
