ABSTRACT
Objective: This study assesses the efficacy of distal periarterial sympathectomy in treating chronic digital ischemia by evaluating clinical outcomes of surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review of distal sympathectomy for chronic digital ischemia was conducted. Data extracted included study design, patient statistics, aetiology, follow-up duration, sympathectomy level, and surgical outcomes. Results: 21 studies were analysed, containing a total of 337 patients, 324 hands, and 398 digits. Patient age ranged from 23.2 to 56.6 years. Causes of ischemia included Scleroderma, Raynaud's disease, atherosclerosis/Buerger's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus/discoid lupus, undifferentiated rheumatic disorder/mixed connective tissue disease, CREST syndrome, trauma and unknown diagnoses. Common digital artery sympathectomy was mostly performed. Follow-up spanned 12-120 months. Outcomes: Distal sympathectomy led to reduced pain in 94.7 % patients. Complete resolution of ulceration was seen in 73 % patients. Subsequent amputation was required in 28 % patients. Other complications were reported in 24.1 % patients. Conclusions: This study indicates that distal periarterial sympathectomy may effectively treat chronic digital ischemia, offering pain relief and resolution of digital ulceration. However, risks of complications and amputation persist. Further research is required to inform patient selection and establish the optimal technique and extent of distal sympathectomy surgery, before it can be considered a valid treatment option.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of an administrative dataset. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate changing practice over a six-year period in the use of repeated lumbar facet joint injections/medial branch blocks in England. METHODS: Patient data were extracted from the Hospital Episodes Statistics database for the period 1st April 2015 to 31st March 2021 for the index lumbar injection and for repeat lumbar injections performed within one year of the first. The exposure of interest was two injections within 180 days or three within one year. Patients aged <17 years and where the body site was listed as cervical, thoracic or sacral were excluded. RESULTS: Data were available for 134,249 patients of which, 8,922 (6.6%) had either two injections within 180 days or three injections within one year. First injections fell from 42,511 in 2015/16 to 13,368 in 2019/20 as did the number of repeat injections: 4,018 to 424 for the same period. If all years had the same carbon footprint as 2019/20, 2.8 kilotons of CO2e would have been saved over the five years, enough to power 2,575 average UK homes for 1 year. The financial cost of injections decreased from £27.6 million in 2015/16 to £7.9 million in 2019/20. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients having repeated lumbar injections has decreased over time but has not been eliminated. More work is needed to educate patients and clinicians regarding alternative and more effective treatments.
