Bulbar and post-bulbar duodenal ulcers: characteristics based on location.

OBJECTIVES: Most research on duodenal ulcers has focused on bulbar ulcers; details on post-bulbar ulcers remain largely unknown. This study was conducted to determine the characteristics of patients with post-bulbar duodenal ulcers depending on their location. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients newly diagnosed with duodenal ulcers on endoscopy at a tertiary referral center in Japan between April 2004 and March 2019. Five hundred fifty-one patients diagnosed with duodenal ulcers were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: Ulcers were observed only in the bulbus in 383 cases, only in the post-bulbar duodenum in 82 cases, and were co-existing in both areas in 86 cases. The Bulbar group had less comorbidities and was more likely to have atrophic gastritis, while the Post-bulbar and Co-existing groups were more likely to be admitted for non-gastrointestinal conditions. Regular acid suppressant use was more common in the post-bulbar group than in the Bulbar group. Bulbar ulcers were associated with a shorter length of stay relative to post-bulbar and co-existing ulcers, but ulcer location was not an independent predictor of length of stay. Patients with co-existing bulbar and post-bulbar ulcers have characteristics similar to those with post-bulbar ulcers alone. CONCLUSION: Patients with post-bulbar ulcers and those with co-existing bulbar and post-bulbar ulcers have different characteristics and outcomes relative to patients with bulbar ulcers.

Development of the modified simple test for evaluating hand function (modified STEF): Construct, reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinimetric evaluation study. INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of numerous performance tests to measure finger dexterity, there is no international consensus on hand function evaluation. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified version of the simple test for evaluating hand function (STEF), which is widely used in Japan. METHODS: The intrarater (n = 40) and inter-rater (n = 32) reliability of the modified STEF was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), models (1,1) and (2,1), respectively, in healthy individuals. The criterion validity of the modified STEF (n = 50) was evaluated by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient relative to the STEF, the Purdue pegboard test (PPT), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The standardized response mean of the scores was calculated to determine responsiveness (n = 35). The modified STEF was used prospectively to measure the change in hand function in a cohort of patients with hand trauma injuries and inflammatory diseases (n = 30), as well as in a cohort of patients with cervical spondylosis (n = 20), from preoperative baseline to 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: ICC1.1 and ICC2.1 values were ≥0.80, indicative of high intrarater and inter-rater reliability. All correlation coefficients were significant (P < .05): STEF (r = 0.89), PPT (r = 0.69), and DASH (r = -0.34). The standardized response mean indicated greater responsiveness of the modified STEF (0.89) than the STEF (0.71) and PPT (0.68) but a lower responsiveness than the DASH (1.11). DISCUSSION: It must be mentioned that modified STEF and DASH cannot be compared without caution. The two types of tools should complement each other when measuring someone's activity and participation level. CONCLUSIONS: The modified STEF is a reliable measurement tool, with a moderate positive correlation with the PPT and a greater responsiveness than the STEF and PPT.

Evaluation of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening among the young: a nationally funded program conducted by a local government in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Finding ways to improve the cervical cancer screening rates among young women has been seen as a critical national health problem in many countries, including Japan. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening conducted by a local government under financial support from the Japanese national government. METHODS: The personal cervical cancer screening information was analyzed for all female residents of Toyonaka City, including any past screening history and clinical results since the year 2009, when a free-coupon program for screening was started. These results were compared to results from 2008, prior to implementation of the free-coupon screening program. RESULTS: The screening rates of women eligible for the free-coupon peaked dramatically compared to women of similar age who paid for their screening; however, the rates for the ineligible-age population also increased significantly in parallel to those in the free-coupon program, possibly by indirect peer and publicity effects. In women aged 20 to 25 years, the consecutive screening rate after a free-coupon screening was significantly lower than for those women who received a regular residential screening. After a free-coupon screening, the rate for participating in consecutive screenings depended significantly on the institution where the participant received her first screening test. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, for a generation of young women 20-25 years of age, a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening was effective in increasing the first-time participation rate for screening; however, the increase in first-time participation did not lead to the expected increase in consecutive screenings.