Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Prosthodont Res ; 67(3): 460-467, 2023 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36403960

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study investigates the effects of hollow structures, added by selective laser sintering (SLS), on the mechanical properties of a Co-Cr alloy for providing an optimal structural property to the framework components of removable partial dentures (RPDs). METHODS: The specimens produced using the 3D data of the dumbbell-shaped cylinders were divided into four groups based on the manufacturing method: Cast, Mill, SLS-solid, and SLS-hollow. Tensile tests were performed to measure the mechanical properties of the specimens. The mechanical property values among the four groups were statistically compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Steel-Dwass test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The median elastic modulus was the largest in the Cast, followed by SLS-solid, Mill, and SLS-hollow, with no significant differences observed between all conditions. The median ultimate tensile strength was the largest in the order of SLS-solid, Mill, SLS-hollow, and Cast. The median 0.2% proof stress was the largest in SLS-solid, followed by SLS-hollow, Cast, and Mill. The median elongation was the highest in the order of Mill, SLS-solid, SLS-hollow, and Cast. CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of hollow structures, the elastic modulus decreased while the mechanical strength and proof stress remained high in SLS specimens. In addition, the ISO 22674 standard for dental metals was met, suggesting that SLS may be a possible method to design RPD frameworks with high strength and optimal structural properties.


Subject(s)
Chromium Alloys , Lasers , Chromium Alloys/chemistry , Metal Ceramic Alloys/chemistry , Tensile Strength , Elastic Modulus , Surface Properties , Materials Testing
2.
J Prosthodont Res ; 65(2): 213-218, 2021 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938855

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by 3D-printed pattern casting (AM-Cast) and selective laser sintering (SLS) under different co nditions with a reinforcement bar. METHODS: A partially edentulous model was scanned with a dental laboratory scanner, and CAD software was used to design the framework. Reinforcement bars (n=0-2) were set on the lingual side of the framework. 3D scanning of the fabricated frameworks by AM-Cast and SLS was performed, and the obtained data were overlapped with the design data. The differences in shape among setting conditions of the bar were statistically compared using the Bonferroni method after the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The ranges in differences of the AM-Cast-0, AM-Cast-1, and AM-Cast-2 were -0.167 to 0.128 mm, -0.101 to 0.105 mm, and -0.185 to 0.015 mm, respectively. The ranges of SLS-0, SLS-1, and SLS-2 were -0.166 to 0.035 mm, -0.182 to 0.049 mm, and -0.138 to 0.038 mm, respectively. Large discrepancies were observed at the joining area of the lingual bar on the right side of the AM-Cast. A significant difference was found between the AM-Cast-0 and AM-Cast-1, and between the AM-Cast-0 and AM-Cast-2. CONCLUSIONS: The setting conditions of the reinforcement bar affected the accuracy of the lingual bar in the AM-Cast; however, no effect was observed on the displacement of the central area of the lingual bar in SLS. Setting a single reinforcing bar on the retentive latticework contributed to improving the accuracy of the lingual bar in the AM-Cast but not the displacement of the central area of the lingual bar in SLS.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Casting Technique , Lasers , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Software
3.
J Prosthodont Res ; 64(2): 224-230, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31466919

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks fabricated by 3D-printed pattern casting and those fabricated by selective laser sintering (SLS). METHODS: A partially edentulous mandibular model was used for the simulation model. Scanning of the model was performed using a dental scanner. The framework was designed by using CAD software. The 3D-printed resin pattern was formed using a 3D printer and casting was performed (AM-Cast framework), and a direct metal laser sintering machine was used for the framework of SLS (SLS framework). 3D scanning of fabricated two types of framework were performed, and these data were overlapped with design data. Fabrication accuracy was verified using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare the discrepancy between the AM-Cast and SLS frameworks. RESULTS: The range of differences for the AM-Cast and SLS framework were -0.185±0.138 to 0.352±0.143mm and -0.166±0.009 to 0.123±0.009mm, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed at the rests, proximal plates, connectors, and clasp arms. Regarding the rests, both lateral and medial displacement in the two types framework was observed in relation to the design data. Large lateral discrepancies of the connectors were observed at the joining area on the tooth-supported side of the lingual bar for the AM-Cast framework. Localized discrepancies were observed at the center of the lingual bar for the SLS framework. CONCLUSION: The accuracies of RPD frameworks fabricated by AM-Cast and SLS differ depending on the specific structural component of the RPD.


Subject(s)
Denture, Partial, Removable , Computer-Aided Design , Dental Casting Technique , Lasers , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Software
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...