Predictors of outcomes after internal fixation of periprosthetic femoral hip fractures Subgroup analysis of the peri-implant and peri-prosthetic fractures Spanish registry (PIPPAS).

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors predisposing patients to poor outcomes after fixation of periprosthetic hip fractures around femoral stems. METHODS: Prospective multicentre cohort study of fractures around a hip replacement stem managed by internal fixation. The primary outcome was one-year mortality, while secondary outcomes were local complications and healthcare burden-related outcomes (nursing facility utilization and hospital length of stay). RESULTS: One-year mortality was 16.2%. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (OR=1.17; 95%CI=1.03-1.33)), Pfeiffer Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score (OR=1.16; 1.06-1.28), prosthetic dysfunction (OR=1.90; 1.00-3.61), and postoperative medical complications (OR=1.97; 1.06-3.68) were predictors of mortality. Patients with prior prosthetic dysfunction, lower Pfeiffer SPMSQ scores, Vancouver A fractures, and fractures fixed only using cerclages were at higher risk of local complications, which occurred in 9.3% of cases. Medical (OR=1.81; 1.05-3.13) and local complications (OR=5.56; 2.42-3.13) emerged as consistent risk factors for new institutionalization. Average hospitalization time was 13.9±9.2 days. Each day of fixation delay led to an average 1.4-day increase in total hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Frail periprosthetic hip-fracture patients with poorer functional status, dysfunctional replacements, and postoperative complications are at increased risk of mortality. Postoperative complications are more common in patients with dysfunctional arthroplasties, Vancouver A fractures, and fixation using cerclages alone. Postoperative complications were the most consistent predictor of higher healthcare resource utilization.

Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach for posterolateral and posteromedial column access in tibial plateau fractures: a detailed cadaveric anatomical study.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) columns are complex injuries that require an appropriate approach. The management of the PL column in these cases can be controversial, and limitations using deep posteromedial interval approaches have been referenced. In this paper, a modification of the Lobenhoffer approach, designed to optimize the access to the PL column, is described in detail. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this approach in a cadaveric anatomical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for detailed anatomical study surrounding the approach. Relationships with cutaneous and deep neurovascular structures were evaluated. The exposure area of the PL and PM columns using this approach was assessed. RESULTS: The cadaveric study showed safe and adequate exposure. Oblique skin and fascia incision just medial to the posterior midline was safe to protect the medial sural cutaneous nerve and the small saphenous vein. Elevation of the popliteus and tibialis posterior muscles offered safe protection of the anterior tibial artery and popliteal neurovascular bundle during retractor placement. Adequate full proximal exposure of the PM and PL columns, including the posterolateral lateral (PLL) and posterolateral central (PLC) segments, was obtained in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach can be a feasible option to access PL and PM columns in tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A proposal of a new algorithm for decision-making approaches in open reduction and internal fixation of complex tibial plateau fractures - SOTA algorithm (Spanish Orthopaedic Trauma Association).

INTRODUCTION: The correct choice of surgical approaches in complex tibial plateau fractures is essential to achieve adequate reduction and fixation. Detailed fracture morphology and direction of columns displacement, that we have named the Main Deformity Direction (MDD), may aid in selecting the optimal surgical strategy. In this article we present a new algorithm based on MDD and column concepts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a group of tibial plateau fractures treated according to this algorithm. The secondary aim was to evaluate the incidence of the different MDD in our multicolumnar subgroup. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Excluding isolated lateral one-column fractures, open fractures and patients not treated following this algorithm, 72 patients with tibial plateau fractures surgically treated with open reduction and internal fixation were collected retrospectively, from three trauma centers, from January 2015 to April 2019. Radiological assessment was performed to establish the columns involved and the MDD. Quality and maintenance of reduction and alignment, complications and functional outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Initial fracture analysis was performed in 72 patients (8 one-column, 35 two-column and 29 multicolumnar fractures). In the multicolumnar group, the posteromedial MDD was the most frequent pattern (17 of 29 patients). Four patients were excluded due to loss of follow-up, resulting 68 patients for final outcome analysis (7 one-column, 34 two-column and 27 multicolumnar). The average follow-up was 18 months (range: 6-52). Excellent/good outcomes were obtained in all one-column, 31 of 34 two-column and 25 of 27 multicolumnar fractures. Incomplete reduction was present in three patients. As complications, we had two loss of reduction, one conversion to knee arthroplasty, one nonunion and one deep infection. No patient presented neurological or vascular problems, knee instability or extension deficit. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results have been obtained following the principles of our algorithm. In addition to the anatomical involvement of columns and segments, we believe that identifying the Main Deformity Direction (MDD) provides useful information for decision-making, especially in multicolumnar fractures. The most frequent MDD in our multicolumnar subgroup was the posteromedial MDD, but more than one-third presented a different MDD, requiring different surgical strategies.