Incidence of MACE in Patients Treated With CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Prospective Study.

Background: Previous retrospective studies have shown that chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy may be associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), especially in the context of cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) events. Objectives: The aim of this prospective observational study was to define the occurrence of MACE in adults undergoing treatment with CAR-T cell therapy and identify associated risk factors. Methods: Vital signs, blood samples, and an echocardiogram were collected prior to and 2 days, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after CAR-T cell infusion, and charts were consulted at 12 months. In the event of CRS, echocardiography was repeated within 72 hours. MACE were defined as cardiovascular death, symptomatic heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, and de novo cardiac arrhythmia. Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled (mean age 58 ± 11 years, 77% men). The median follow-up duration was 487 days (Q1-Q3: 258-622 days). There were 24 episodes of CRS in 23 patients (52%) (13 grade 1, 10 grade 2, and 1 grade 3), with a median time to CRS of 4 days. Two patients had MACE (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation) within 1 year and 6 and 7 days after CAR-T cell infusion. There was no change in left ventricular ejection fraction, but a modest decrease in global longitudinal strain was noted. Conclusions: There were few cardiac effects associated with contemporary CAR-T cell therapy. As MACE occurred after CRS episodes, aggressive treatment and close follow-up during CRS events are essential.

Considerations for addressing anti-vaccination campaigns: How did we get here and what can we do about it?

A course on vaccine development asked students to write a blog addressing general anti-vaccination strategies and their significance today, in the context of the resistance seen against novel SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. This perspective explores how and why these efforts are successful at reducing vaccine uptake and why, for the most part, efforts to combat the movement have been unsuccessful. This summary of the collective view of the class provides recommendations for combatting current and future campaigns of misinformation. It is hoped that this perspective will serve as a call to action for clinical pharmacologists and translational scientists to do their part to educate the lay community and promote the science in an open and transparent manner to ensure that current and future vaccines fulfill their potential.