ABSTRACT
Objetivo Conocer la epidemiología y evolución al alta de los pacientes oncológicos que precisan ingreso en UCI. Diseño Estudio descriptivo observacional de datos del registro ENVIN-HELICS combinado con variables registradas específicamente. Se comparan pacientes con y sin neoplasia. Se identifican grupos de pacientes neoplásicos con peor evolución. Ámbito UCI participantes en ENVIN-HELICS del año 2018 con participación voluntaria en el registro oncológico. Pacientes Ingresados más de 24horas. Entre estos aquellos diagnosticados de neoplasia en los últimos 5 años. Variables principales Las generales epidemiológicas del registro ENVIN-HELICS y variables relacionadas con la neoplasia. Resultados En las 92 UCI con datos completos se seleccionaron 11.796 pacientes, de los que 1.786 (15,1%) son pacientes con neoplasia. La proporción de pacientes con cáncer por unidad fue muy variable (rango: 1-48%). La mortalidad en UCI de los pacientes oncológicos fue superior a los no oncológicos (12,3% versus 8,9%; p<0,001). En pacientes oncológicos predominaron los ingresados en el postoperatorio programado (46,7%) o urgente (15,3%). Los pacientes con proceso patológico médico fueron más graves, con mayor estancia y mortalidad (27, 5%). Aquellos ingresados en UCI por enfermedad no quirúrgica relacionada con el cáncer tuvieron la mortalidad más alta (31,4%). Conclusión Existe una gran variabilidad en el porcentaje de pacientes oncológicos en las diferentes UCI. El 46,7% de los pacientes ingresa tras someterse a cirugía programada. La mayor mortalidad corresponde a pacientes con enfermedad médica (27,5%) y a los ingresados por complicaciones relacionadas con el cáncer (31,4%). (AU)
Objective To assess the epidemiology and outcome at discharge of cancer patients requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Design A descriptive observational study was made of data from the ENVIN-HELICS registry, combined with specifically compiled variables. Comparisons were made between patients with and without neoplastic disease, and groups of cancer patients with a poorer outcome were identified. Setting Intensive Care Units participating in ENVIN-HELICS 2018, with voluntary participation in the oncological registry. Patients Subjects admitted during over 24hours and diagnosed with cancer in the last 5 years. Primary endpoints The general epidemiological endpoints of the ENVIN-HELICS registry and cancer-related variables. Results Of the 92 ICUs with full data, a total of 11,796 patients were selected, of which 1786 (15.1%) were cancer patients. The proportion of cancer patients per Unit proved highly variable (1-48%). In-ICU mortality was higher among the cancer patients than in the non-oncological subjects (12.3% versus 8.9%; P<.001). Elective postoperative (46.7%) or emergency admission (15.3%) predominated in the cancer patients. Patients with medical disease were in more serious condition, with longer stay and greater mortality (27.5%). The patients admitted in ICU due to nonsurgical disease related to cancer exhibited the highest mortality rate (31.4%). Conclusions Great variability was recorded in the percentage of cancer patients in the different ICUs. A total of 46.7% of the patients were admitted after undergoing scheduled surgery. The highest mortality rate corresponded to patients with medical disease (27.5%), and to those admitted due to cancer-related complications (31.4%). (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Intensive Care Units , Patients , Neoplasms , Epidemiology , MortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the epidemiology and outcome at discharge of cancer patients requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). DESIGN: A descriptive observational study was made of data from the ENVIN-HELICS registry, combined with specifically compiled variables. Comparisons were made between patients with and without neoplastic disease, and groups of cancer patients with a poorer outcome were identified. SETTING: Intensive Care Units participating in ENVIN-HELICS 2018, with voluntary participation in the oncological registry. PATIENTS: Subjects admitted during over 24â¯h and diagnosed with cancer in the last 5 years. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: The general epidemiological endpoints of the ENVIN-HELICS registry and cancer-related variables. RESULTS: Of the 92 ICUs with full data, a total of 11,796 patients were selected, of which 1786 (15.1%) were cancer patients. The proportion of cancer patients per Unit proved highly variable (1%-48%). In-ICU mortality was higher among the cancer patients than in the non-oncological subjects (12.3% versus 8.9%; pâ¯<â¯.001). Elective postoperative (46.7%) or emergency admission (15.3%) predominated in the cancer patients. Patients with medical disease were in more serious condition, with longer stay and greater mortality (27.5%). The patients admitted to the ICU due to nonsurgical disease related to cancer exhibited the highest mortality rate (31.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Great variability was recorded in the percentage of cancer patients in the different ICUs. A total of 46.7% of the patients were admitted after undergoing scheduled surgery. The highest mortality rate corresponded to patients with medical disease (27.5%), and to those admitted due to cancer-related complications (31.4%).
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Neoplasms , Critical Care , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Neoplasms/epidemiology , PrognosisSubject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Visitors to Patients , Adult , Aged , Appointments and Schedules , Family/psychology , Female , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patients/psychology , Personal Satisfaction , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spain , Visitors to Patients/psychologyABSTRACT
The role of Critical Care Medicine in Spain requires continuous revision and reflection. We have values and strengths that are evidenced in our daily work and by their important effects in routine hospital activity. Other medical specialties seeking to assume activities referred to critical patient care, as well as a number of other circumstances, may have a negative impact upon our routine duties. This article reflects the impressions of an important number of members of the Planning, Organization and Management Task Force of the Spanish Society of Critical Medicine Society (Grupo de Trabajo de Planificación, Organización y Gestión; GTPOG-SEMICYUC). The actions required to upgrade our Critical Care Medicine model are presented, evolving towards a broader view such as the 'ICU without walls' or 'Expanded ICU'. The subject is addressed from three complementary standpoints: actions involving the administrative authorities; actions required on the part of our scientific Society; and initiatives to be implemented locally in each Intensive Care Unit (led by the corresponding Unit representatives) at both hospital level and involving the regional authorities.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Hospital Administration , Models, Organizational , Organizational Objectives , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Advisory Committees , Humans , SpainABSTRACT
In recent years, an increment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci has been documented in nosocomial and hospital-acquired infections. In diverse countries, a rapid development of resistance to common antibiotics against gram-positive cocci has been observed. This situation is exceptional in Spain but our country might be affected in the near future. New antimicrobials active against these multi-drug resistant pathogens are nowadays available. It is essential to improve our current knowledge about pharmacokinetic properties of traditional and new antimicrobials to maximize its effectiveness and to minimize toxicity. These issues are even more important in critically ill patients because inadequate empirical therapy is associated with therapeutic failure and a poor outcome. Experts representing two scientific societies (Grupo de estudio de Infecciones en el Paciente Critico de la SEIMC and Grupo de trabajo de Enfermedades Infecciosas de la SEMICYUC) have elaborated a consensus document based on the current scientific evidence to summarize recommendations for the treatment of serious infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critically ill patients.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/etiology , Catheterization/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Critical Illness , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Humans , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In recent years there has been an increase in infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critical patients, together with a rapid development of resistance to the antibiotics which are normally used to treat them. The objective is to prepare an antibiotic treatment guide for the most common infections caused by gram positive cocci in critical patients. This guide will help in the decision-making process regarding the care of such patients. METHOD: Experts from two scientific societies worked together to prepare a consensus document. They were members of the Study Group on Infections in Critical Patients (GEIPC), which is part of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), and the Infectious Diseases Working Group (GTEI), belonging to the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC). There was a systematic review of the literature published up to September 2006 regarding this type of infections and the antibiotic treatments marketed to that date. An evidence grading system was applied according to the strength of the recommendation (categories A, B or C) and the level of evidence (categories I, II or III). Recommendations were given if there was consensus among the experts from both societies. RESULTS: The antibiotic regimens recommended for treating infections caused by gram-positive cocci were presented in the form of tables, showing the recommendation grade. Alternatives were given for allergic patients. The scientific basis supporting the aforementioned recommendations is explained within the text and the references upon which they are based are cited. CONCLUSIONS: A summary of an evidence-based practical guide for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critical patients is presented.
