Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932647

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compares hearing outcomes of two prosthesis materials, bone and titanium, used in ossiculoplasty. DESIGN: This retrospective nationwide registry-based study uses data systematically collected by the Swedish Quality Registry for Ear Surgery (SwedEar). SETTING: The data were obtained from clinics in Sweden that perform ossiculoplasty. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent ossiculoplasty using either bone or titanium prostheses were registered in SwedEar between 2013 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing outcome expressed as air-bone gap (ABG) gain. RESULTS: The study found no differences between bone and titanium for ABG or air conduction (AC) for either partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP) or total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP). In a comparison between PORP and TORP for ABG and AC outcomes, regardless of the material used, PORP showed a small advantage, with an additional improvement of 3.3 dB (95% CI [confidence interval], 0.1-4.4) in ABG and 2.2 dB (95% CI, 1.7-4.8) in AC. In secondary surgery using TORP, titanium produced slightly better results for high-frequency pure tone average. The success rate, a postoperative ABG ≤20 dB, was achieved in 62% of the operations for the whole group. CONCLUSION: Both bone and titanium used to reconstruct the ossicular chain produce similar hearing outcomes for both PORP and TORP procedures. However, titanium may be a preferable option for secondary surgeries involving TORP. The success rate, a postoperative ABG ≤20 dB, is consistent with other studies, but there is room for improvement in patient selection criteria and surgical techniques.

2.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 23(1): 240, 2023 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884909

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Swedish Quality Register for Ear Surgery (SwedEar) is a national register monitoring surgical procedures and outcomes of ear surgery to facilitate quality improvement. The value of the register is dependent on the quality of its data. SwedEar has never been validated regarding data quality or missing entries. Therefor, the purpose of this study was to assess coverage, completeness and response rate in the register and validate the physicians' reported data accuracy. METHODS: In this validation study, the completeness, response rate and missing registrations were analysed. Data in SwedEar were compared with the yearly collected statistics of otosurgical procedures in The Swedish Otosurgical Society and the comparison of rates between groups was calculated with Fisher's exact test. Validation of registered data accuracy was performed on every 20th registered case during a five-year period. Data were reabstracted from medical records and compared with the original registration. Interrater agreement, reliability measures, Cohen's kappa, Gwet's AC1 and positive predictive value were calculated. RESULTS: SwedEar has a coverage of 100%. The completeness of registered cases was 84% and the response rate was 74%. The validation of data accuracy assessed 13 530 variables, including audiograms. Less than 3% of incorrect or missing variables were identified. For most of the pre- and postoperative variables the Kappa and Gwet´s AC1 results show an almost perfect agreement (> 0.80). For audiogram data the ICC shows an excellent reliability (> 0.9) for all but one value. CONCLUSION: This validation shows that SwedEar has excellent coverage, high completeness, and that the data in the register have almost perfect reliability. The data are suitable for both clinical and research purposes. Further efforts to improve completeness are warranted.


Subject(s)
Data Accuracy , Medical Records , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Registries , Sweden
3.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 45(3): 357-363, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971348

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To present hearing results after successful primary myringoplasty surgeries registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Myringoplasty and to evaluate the chance of hearing improvement and the risk of hearing loss. DESIGN: A retrospective nationwide cohort study based on prospectively collected registry data between 2002 and 2012. SETTINGS: Registry data from secondary and tertiary hospitals performing myringoplasty. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with healed tympanic membrane after primary myringoplasty surgery performed from 2002 to 2012 in Sweden. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative hearing results, hearing gain and air-bone gap (ABG). RESULTS: In 2226 myringoplasties, air conduction audiograms were recorded, and the average preoperative pure tone average (PTA4 ) of the group was 28.5 dB, which improved postoperatively to 19.6 dB with an average of 8.8 dB improvement. Bone conduction was measured for 1476 procedures. Closure of the ABG to 10 dB or less was achieved in 51% of the ears and to less than 20 dB in 89% of the ears. Sixty-one percent of patients with preoperatively deteriorated hearing experienced improved hearing, but 3% of all patients experienced deteriorated hearing. After the surgery, 93% of the patients were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing results after successful myringoplasty surgery are often favourable, but although the tympanic membrane is healed, hearing improvement is not guaranteed, and hearing deterioration can also occur.


Subject(s)
Hearing/physiology , Myringoplasty , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Recovery of Function , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Sweden , Treatment Outcome , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/complications , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/physiopathology , Young Adult
4.
Int J Audiol ; 54(2): 63-9, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25180536

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to assess health-related quality of life and hearing-related disability in subjects with otosclerosis 30 years after surgery. DESIGN: An observational study was performed. Medical records were reviewed, a clinical examination as well as audiometric assessments were performed. Generic health-related quality of life was assessed by the SF-36v2 and hearing disability by a shortened version of SSQ (speech spatial and qualities of hearing scale). STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-five individuals, who had undergone stapedectomy in 1977-79 at a tertiary referral center. RESULTS: Generic health-related quality of life according to SF-36 subscale scores was comparable to that of an age- and sex-matched reference population. The SF-36 mental component summary score (MCS) was, however, significantly better than that of the reference population. The mental and physical summary component scores correlated significantly to hearing disability measured by the SSQ but not to hearing impairment. Hearing disability was displayed in all SSQ sub-scores, especially in more complex listening situations and in the localization of sounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that individuals with otosclerosis, 30 years after surgery, have a good generic health-related quality of life, despite moderate to severe hearing loss and significant hearing disabilities.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Hearing Loss/psychology , Otosclerosis/surgery , Quality of Life , Stapes Surgery , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...