ABSTRACT
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis affecting the spine, presenting a considerable morbidity risk. Although evidence consistently indicates an elevated risk of ischemic heart disease among AS patients, debates persist regarding the likelihood of these patients developing left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Our investigation aimed to determine whether individuals with AS face a greater risk of LVD compared to the general population. To accomplish this, we identified studies exploring LVD in AS patients across five major databases and Google Scholar. Initially, 431 studies were identified, of which 30 met the inclusion criteria, collectively involving 2933 participants. Results show that AS patients had: (1) poorer Ejection Fraction (EF) [mean difference (MD): -0.92% (95% CI: -1.25 to -0.59)], (2) impaired Early (E) and Late (atrial-A) ventricular filling velocity (E/A) ratio [MD: -0.10 m/s (95% CI: -0.13 to -0.08)], (3) prolonged deceleration time (DT) [MD: 12.30 ms (95% CI: 9.23-15.36)] and, (4) a longer mean isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) [MD: 8.14 ms (95% CI: 6.58-9.70)] compared to controls. Though AS patients show increased risks of both systolic and diastolic LVD, we found no significant differences were observed in systolic blood pressure [MD: 0.32 mmHg (95% Confidence Interval (CI): -2.09 to 2.73)] or diastolic blood pressure [MD: 0.30 mmHg (95% CI: -0.40 to 1.01)] compared to the general population. This study reinforces AS patients' susceptibility to LVD without a notable difference in HTN risk.
Subject(s)
Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/physiopathology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/complications , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/epidemiology , Humans , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/epidemiology , Male , Stroke Volume/physiology , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Echocardiography/methods , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Impella is an advanced ventricular assist device frequently used as a bridge to heart transplantation. The association of Impella with increased rates of gout flares has not been studied. Our primary aim is to determine the rates of gout flares in patients on Impella support. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2017 and September 2022 involving all patients who underwent heart transplantation. The cohort was divided into two groups based on Impella support for statistical analysis. In patients receiving Impella support, outcome measures were compared based on the development of gout flares. 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity match, as well as inverse propensity of treatment weighted analyses, were performed to explore the causal relationship between impella use and gout flare in our study population. RESULTS: Our analysis included 213 patients, among which 42 (19.71%) patients were supported by Impella. Impella and non-Impella groups had similar age, race, and BMI, but more males were in the Impella group. Gout and chronic kidney disease were more prevalent in Impella-supported patients, while coronary artery disease was less common. The prevalence of gout flare was significantly higher in Impella patients (30.9% vs. 5.3%). 42 Impella-supported patients were matched with 42 patients from the non-impella group upon performing a 1:1 propensity matching. Impella-supported patients were noted to have a significantly higher risk of gout flare (30.9% vs. 7.1%, SMD = 0.636), despite no significant difference in pre-existing gout history and use of anti-gout medications. Impella use was associated with a significantly increased risk of gout flare in unadjusted (OR 8.07), propensity-matched (OR 5.83), and the inverse propensity of treatment-weighted analysis (OR 4.21). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to identify the potential association between Impella support and increased rates of gout flares in hospitalized patients. Future studies are required to confirm this association and further elucidate the biological pathways. It is imperative to consider introducing appropriate measures to prevent and promptly manage gout flares in Impella-supported patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aim to determine the added value of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in stroke risk assessment for hypertensive Black adults. METHODS: We examined 1,647 participants with hypertension without a history of cardiovascular (CV) disease, from the Jackson Heart Study. Cox regression analysis estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for incident stroke per standard deviation increase in cIMT and quartiles while adjusting for baseline variables. We then evaluated the predictive capacity of cIMT when added to the pool cohort equations (PCEs). RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 57 ± 10 years. Each standard deviation increase in cIMT (0.17 mm) was associated with approximately 30% higher risk of stroke (HR 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.49). Notably, cIMT proved valuable in identifying residual stroke risk among participants with well-controlled blood pressure, showing up to a 56% increase in the odds of stroke for each 0.17 mm increase in cIMT among those with systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg. Additionally, the addition of cIMT to the PCE resulted in the reclassification of 58% of low to borderline risk participants with stroke to a higher-risk category and 28% without stroke to a lower-risk category, leading to a significant net reclassification improvement of 0.22 (0.10-0.30). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based cohort of middle-aged Black adults with hypertension and no history of CV disease at baseline, cIMT is significantly associated with incident stroke and enhances stroke risk stratification.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Stroke , Adult , Middle Aged , Humans , Aged , Carotid Intima-Media Thickness , Risk Factors , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Risk Assessment/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Traditional journal clubs have been shown to be insufficient in improving residents' scholarly productivity, often due to the inability to sustain residents' interest and participation. Additionally, the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic restrictions caused a decline in academic scholarly productivity across residency programs. We evaluated the impact of a resident-led research club called 'journal café' on residents' scholarly productivity by comparing scholarly output between the journal café members and non-members during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The journal café was established in the 2012/2013 academic year by internal medicine residents of a university residency program in Atlanta, Georgia, to foster self-directed collaboration among residents based on shared interests in academic research. The journal café runs independently of the residency program's journal club. We categorized IM residents at our institution into journal café members and non-members and collected data on their research productivity during residency training and the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey was conducted between April and June 2021 and analyzed data presented using frequencies, tables, and appropriate charts. RESULTS: Sixty-eight residents (29 journal café members and 39 non-members) completed the survey (response rate of 85%). A significantly higher number of journal café members reported having five or more research publications (55.1% vs 7.1%, P < .001) and scientific presentations (48.3% vs 2.6%, P < .001) compared with non-members. Additionally, more journal café members published COVID-19-related research in peer-reviewed journals compared with non-members (68% vs 32%, n = 19). Finally, most of the residents cited the opportunity of a platform to share and brainstorm on research ideas as the reason for joining the journal café. CONCLUSION: We found an association between journal café participation and increased scholarly activity, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Independent resident-led research clubs supported by the residency program may complement the traditional journal clubs and enhance residents' participation in research.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 30-day postoperative mortality and palliative care consultations in patients that underwent surgical procedures in the United States before and after Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (MACRA) implementation. DESIGN: Retrospective, Observational cohort study. SETTING: Secondary data were collected from the U.S. National Inpatient Sample, the largest hospital database in the country. The time span was from 2011 to 2019. PATIENTS: Adult patients that electively underwent 1 of 19 major procedures. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was cumulative postoperative mortality in two study cohorts. The secondary outcome was palliative care use. We identified 4,900,451 patients and categorized them into two study cohorts: PreM: 2011-2014 ( n = 2,103,836) and PostM: 2016-2019 ( n = 2,796,615). Regression discontinuity estimates and multivariate analysis were used. Across all procedures, 149,372 patients (7.1%) and 156,610 patients (5%) died within 30 days of their index procedures in the PreM and PostM cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant increase in mortality rates around postoperative day (POD) 30 (POD 26-30 vs 31-35) for both cohorts. More patients had inpatient palliative consultations during POD 31-60 compared with POD 1-30 in PreM (8,533 of 2,081,207 patients [0.4%] vs 1,118 of 22,629 patients [4.9%]) and PostM (18,915 of 2,791,712 patients [0.7%] vs 417 of 4,903 patients [8.5%]). Patients were more likely to receive palliative care consultations during POD 31-60 compared with POD 1-30 in both the PreM (odds ratio [OR] 5.31; 95% CI, 2.22-8.68; p < 0.001) and the PostM (OR 7.84; 95% CI, 4.83-9.10; p < 0.001) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in postoperative mortality after POD 30 before or after MACRA implementation. However, palliative care use markedly increased after POD 30. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating because of several confounders.
Subject(s)
Children's Health Insurance Program , Palliative Care , Aged , Adult , Child , Humans , United States , Medicare , Retrospective Studies , Policy , Referral and Consultation , Critical CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Overall inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) utilization has decreased in the United States since the 2010 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication. The FDA renewed this safety warning in 2014 with additional mandates on reporting IVCF-related adverse events. We evaluated the impact of the FDA recommendations on IVCF placements for different indications from 2010 to 2019 and further assessed utilization trends by region and hospital teaching status. METHODS: Inferior vena cava filter placements between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database using the associated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and Tenth Revision codes. Inferior vena cava filter placements were categorized by indication for venous thromboembolism (VTE) "treatment" in patients with VTE diagnosis and contraindication to anticoagulation and "prophylaxis" in patients without VTE. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze utilization trends. RESULTS: A total of 823 717 IVCFs were placed over the study period, of which 644 663 (78.3%) were for VTE treatment and 179 054 (21.7%) were for prophylaxis indications. The median age for both categories of patients was 68 years. The total number of IVCFs placed for all indications decreased from 129 616 in 2010 to 58 465 in 2019, with an aggregate decline rate of -8.4%. The decline rate was higher between 2014 and 2019 than between 2010 and 2014 (-11.6% vs -7.2%). From 2010 to 2019, IVCF placement for VTE treatment and prophylaxis trended downward at rates of -7.9% and -10.2%, respectively. Urban nonteaching hospitals saw the highest decline for both VTE treatment (-17.2%) and prophylactic indications (-18.0%). Hospitals located in the Northeast region had the highest decline rates for VTE treatment (-10.3%) and prophylactic indications (-12.5%). CONCLUSION: The higher decline rate in IVCF placements between 2014 and 2019 compared with 2010 and 2014 suggests an additional impact of the renewed 2014 FDA safety indications on national IVCF utilization. Variations in IVCF use for VTE treatment and prophylactic indications existed across hospital teaching types, locations, and regions. CLINICAL IMPACT: Inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) are associated with medical complications. The 2010 and 2014 FDA safety warnings appeared to have synergistically contributed to a significant decline in IVCF utilization rates from 2010 - 2019 in the US. IVC filter placements in patients without venous thromboembolism (VTE) declined at a higher rate than VTE. However, IVCF utilization varied across hospitals and geographical locations, likely due to the absence of universally accepted clinical guidelines on IVCF indications and use. Harmonization of IVCF placement guidelines is needed to standardize clinical practice, thereby reducing the observed regional and hospital variations and potential IVC filter overutilization.
ABSTRACT
Background Although there has been a decrease in the incidence of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the United States, this trend might be stagnant or increasing in young women. We assessed the trends, characteristics, and outcomes of STEMI in women aged 18 to 55 years. Methods and Results We identified 177 602 women aged 18 to 55 with the primary diagnosis of STEMI from the National Inpatient Sample during years 2008 to 2019. We performed trend analyses to assess hospitalization rates, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor profile, and in-hospital outcomes stratified by three age subgroups (18-34, 35-44, and 45-55 years). We found STEMI hospitalization rates were decreased in the overall study cohort from 52 per 100 000 hospitalizations in 2008 to 36 per 100 000 in 2019. This was driven by decreased proportion of hospitalizations in women aged 45 to 55 years (74.2% to-71.7%; P<0.001). Proportion of STEMI hospitalizationincreased in women aged 18-34 (4.7%-5.5%; P<0.001) and 35-44 years (21.2%-22.7%; P<0.001). The prevalence of traditional and non-traditional female-specific or female-predominant CVD risk factors increased in all age subgroups. The adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality in the overall study cohort and age subgroups were unchanged throughout the study period. Additionally, we observed an increase in the adjusted odds of cardiogenic shock, acute stroke, and acute kidney injury in the overall cohort over the study period. Conclusions STEMI hospitalizations are increasing among women aged <45 years, and in-hospital mortality has not changed over the past 12 years in women aged <55 years. Future studies on the optimization of risk assessment and management of STEMI in young women are urgently needed.
Subject(s)
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic , Hospital MortalityABSTRACT
High safety-net burden hospitals (HBHs) treating large numbers of uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients have generally been linked to worse clinical outcomes. However, limited data exist on the impact of the hospitals' safety-net burden on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To compare the differences in survival to discharge, routine discharge home, and healthcare resource utilization between patients at HBH with those treated at low safety-net burden hospital (LBH). DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study across hospitals in the United States: Hospitalized patients greater than or equal to 18 years that underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between 2008 and 2018 identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Database. Data analysis was conducted in January 2022. EXPOSURE: IHCA. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge. Other outcomes are routine discharge home among survivors, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization cost. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2018, an estimated 555,016 patients were hospitalized with IHCA, of which 19.2% occurred at LBH and 55.2% at HBH. Compared with LBH, patients at HBH were younger (62 ± 20 yr vs 67 ± 17 yr) and predominantly in the lowest median household income (< 25th percentile). In multivariate analysis, HBH was associated with lower chances of survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and lower odds of routine discharge (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.47-0.75), compared with LBH. In addition, IHCA patients at publicly owned hospitals and those with medium and large hospital bed size were less likely to survive to hospital discharge, while patients with median household income greater than 25th percentile had better odds of hospital survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study suggests that patients who experience IHCA at HBH may have lower rates and odds of in-hospital survival and are less likely to be routinely discharged home after CPR. Median household income and hospital-level characteristics appear to contribute to survival.
ABSTRACT
Contemporary data on catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) utilization trends and associated hospital outcomes in pulmonary embolism (PE) n the US is limited. Using the nationwide inpatient sample database, we identified patients hospitalized for acute PE treated with CDT from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. Cochrane-Armitage test was used to evaluate the temporal trends in utilization, hospital mortality, and major bleeding rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare differences in the outcomes across race/ethnicity, 4444 patients (unweighted hospitalizations) underwent CDT during the study period. The mean age ± standard deviation of the population was 58 ± 16 years and the majority were males (54%). 3269 (73.6%) patients were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 802 (18.0%) patients were non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 373 (8.4%) patients were of 'other' races/ethnicities. There was a more than tenfold increase in CDT use in 2018 compared to 2008. The total mortality and bleeding rates were approximately 7 and 10% respectively. Hospital mortality rates trended down across all races/ethnicities during the study period. A similar downward trend in bleeding rates was noted in NHB only (28.6% vs 10.7%, p = 0.04). In-hospital mortality and major bleeding odds were comparable across all races/ethnicities were comparable. NHB patients and other races were more likely to require blood transfusion and incur higher hospitalization costs compared with NHW patients. CDT use increased significantly in the US during the study period with a corresponding downward trend in in-hospital mortality across all races, and bleeding rates in NHB.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Thrombolytic Therapy , Male , Humans , Female , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents , Ethnicity , Treatment Outcome , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Catheters , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Importance: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a recognized complication of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) associated with poor prognosis. Although racial and ethnic disparities have been described in the occurrence and outcomes of PPCM, it is unclear if these disparities persist among patients with PPCM and CS. Objectives: To evaluate the temporal trends in CS incidence among hospitalized patients with PPCM stratified by race and ethnicity and to investigate the racial and ethnic differences in hospital mortality, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use, and heart transplantation (HT). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients with PPCM complicated by CS in the US from 2005 to 2019 identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Data analysis was conducted in November 2021. Exposure: PPCM complicated by CS. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incidence of CS in PPCM stratified by race and ethnicity. The secondary outcome was racial and ethnic differences in hospital mortality, MCS use, and HT. Results: Of 55â¯804 hospitalized patients with PPCM, 1945 patients had CS, including 947 Black patients, 236 Hispanic patients, and 702 White patients, translating to an incidence rate of 35 CS events per 1000 patients with PPCM. The mean (SD) age was 31 (9) years. Black and Hispanic patients had higher CS incidence rates (39 events per 1000 patients with PPCM) compared with White patients (33 events per 1000 patients with PPCM). CS incidence rates significantly increased across all races and ethnicities over the study period. Overall, the odds of developing CS were higher in Black patients (aOR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.15-1.57]; P < .001) and Hispanic patients (aOR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.17-1.59]; P < 001) compared with White patients during the study period. Compared with White patients, the odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.67 [95% CI, 1.21-2.32]; P = .002) and Hispanic (aOR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.45-3.33]; P < .001) patients. Hispanic patients were more likely to receive any type of MCS device (aOR, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.60-3.09]; P < .001), intraaortic balloon pump (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.44]; P < .001), and ventricular assisted device (aOR, 4.45 [95% CI, 2.45-8.08]; P < .001), compared with White patients. Black patients were more likely to receive VAD (aOR, 2.69 [95% CI, 1.63-4.42]; P < .001) compared with White patients. Black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive HT compared with White patients (Black patients: aOR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.78]; P = .02; Hispanic patients: aOR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.06-0.42]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings highlight significant racial disparities in mortality and HT among hospitalized patients with PPCM complicated by CS in the US. More research to identify factors of racial and ethnic disparities is needed to guide interventions to improve outcomes of patients with PPCM.
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies , Ethnicity , Adult , Humans , Peripartum Period , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/epidemiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , White PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the immediate post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) period for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the trends and predictors of SCA occurring within 48 h post PCI for STEMI. METHODS: We systematically reviewed data from the electronic medical records of 403 patients who underwent PCI for STEMI between January 2014 and December 2019. Trends in the incidence of SCA 48 h post PCI for STEMI were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of SCA within 48 h post PCI for STEMI. RESULTS: Of the 403 patients who underwent PCI for STEMI, 44 (11%) had SCA within 48 h post PCI. The incidence of SCA within 48 h post PCI decreased from 22% in 2014 to 8% in 2019; P = 0.03. After adjusting for underlying confounding variables in the multivariable logistic regression models, out of hospital cardiac arrest [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 23.9; confidence interval (CI), 10.2-56.1], left main coronary artery disease (aOR, 3.1; CI, 1.1-9.4), left main PCI (aOR, 6.6; CI: 1.4-31.7), new-onset heart failure (aOR, 2.0; CI, 4.3-9.4), and cardiogenic shock (aOR, 5.8; CI, 1.7-20.2) were statistically significant predictors of SCA within 48 h post PCI for STEMI. CONCLUSION: We identified essential factors associated with SCA within 48 h post PCI for STEMI. Future studies are needed to devise effective strategies to decrease the risk of SCA in the early post-PCI period.
Subject(s)
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The timing of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) after myocardial infarction (MI) has been a subject of research because of the impact on preventive strategies. Currently, there is limited data on the risk of SCA in the immediate post revascularization period (≤48 h) in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record system and identified patients who underwent revascularization for NSTEMI at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia between January 1st, 2014-December 31st, 2019. We selected patients who had SCA within 48 h of revascularization and evaluated their socio-demographic and inpatient characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen (16) cases of SCA in the immediate post revascularization period (within 48 h) were identified and analyzed which corresponds to an incidence rate of 1.8% (n = 16/869). The mean age (SD) was 69 years (14.6) and 75% were males. On angiography, more than 80% of the patients had hemodynamically significant lesions in the left anterior descending arteries and its territories and 50% had multivessel disease. All 16 patients had at least one coronary artery with hemodynamically significant lesion and successfully underwent revascularization. Three-quarter of the patients had a shockable rhythm. The etiology of SCA was in-stent thrombosis in 25% of the patients, cardiogenic shock in 19%, acute respiratory failure in 13% and unknown in 44% of the cases. The 30-day mortality rate was 38%. CONCLUSION: The rate of SCA is high in the first 48 h after MI even with revascularization. Risk stratification for SCA during this critical period may improve outcomes.
Subject(s)
Heart Arrest , Myocardial Infarction , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Aged , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine racial differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in a safety net hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 disease associated respiratory failure who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation and admitted to the ICU from May 1, 2020 - July 30 -2020 at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia - a safety net hospital. We evaluated the association between mortality and demographics, co-morbidities, inpatient laboratory, and radiological parameters. RESULTS: Among 181 critically ill mechanically ventilated African American patients treated at a safety net hospital, the mortality rate was 33%. On stratified analysis by race (Table 2), mortality rates were significantly higher in African Americans (39%) and Hispanics (26.3%), compared to Whites (18.9%). On multivariate regression, African Americans were 3 times more likely to die in the ICU compared to Whites (OR 3.1 95% CI 1.6 -5.5). Likewise, the likelihood of mortality was higher in Hispanics compared to Whites (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.0 -3.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a high ICU mortality rate in a cohort of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 infection treated at a safety net hospital. African Americans and Hispanics had significantly higher risks of ICU mortality compared to Whites. These study findings further elucidate the disproportionately higher burden of COVID-19 infection in African Americans and Hispanics.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety-net ProvidersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disproportionately affects African Americans, and they tend to experience more severe course and adverse outcomes. Using a simple and validated instrument of depression screening, we evaluated the incidence and severity of major depression among African American patients within 90 days of recovery from severe COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. METHODS: African American patients hospitalized and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19-associated respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, were screened for depression within 90 days of hospital discharge using the validated patient health questionnaires (PHQ-2) and PHQ-9. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients completed the questionnaire. The median age was 52.5 years [IQR 44-65] and 65% were males. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (66%) and diabetes mellitus (51%). Forty-four percent of the patients had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) based on their PHQ-9 questionnaire responses. The incidence of MDD was higher among females (69%, n=18/26) compared to males (29%, n=14/47), in patients > 75 years (66%) and those with multiple comorbidities (45%). Eighteen percent of the patients had moderate depression, while 15% and 22% had moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. Only 26% (n=7/27) of eligible patients were receiving treatment for depression at the time of this survey. CONCLUSION: The incidence of depression in a cohort of African American patients without prior psychiatric conditions who recovered from severe COVID-19 infection was 44%. More than 70% of these patients were not receiving treatment for depression.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Respiratory Insufficiency , Black or African American , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapyABSTRACT
Background: Rothia species are known to cause dental caries and periodontal disease, and infrequently cause native or prosthetic valve endocarditis mostly in immunocompromised persons. With an increasing use of implantable cardiac devices, early clinical suspicion and a rapid diagnosis of endocarditis is essential for optimal treatment to reduce complications and mortality. Bacteremic infection with Rothia dentocariosa in immunocompetent persons is uncommon. Pacemaker lead-related endocarditis caused by Rothia spp. is rare and management guidelines are not defined. Case Presentation: We report a rare case of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) lead endocarditis in an immunocompetent patient that was caused by Rothia dentocariosa. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of this rare cause of CIED lead infections and should be acquainted with the optimal strategies of prompt antibiotic therapy and removal of the infected device/leads.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the difference in the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in the summer compared to the fall surge. AIM: To compare the sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes among mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the summer and fall surges in the year 2020. METHODS: We included patients admitted to the ICU and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 associated respiratory failure between April 1 and December 31, 2020. Patients were categorized into summer surge for ICU admissions between June 15, 2020, and August 15, 2020, and fall surge between October 15, 2020, and December 31, 2020. We compared patients' characteristics and outcomes using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients were admitted to the Grady Memorial Hospital ICU and mechanically ventilated for COVID-19 associated hypoxemic respiratory failure during the period considered (125 during the summer surge and 95 during the fall surge). More women were admitted in the fall compared to summer (41.1% vs 36.8%, difference, 4.3%; 95%CI: 1.2, 7.5). Patients admitted in the fall had fewer comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea and body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2). Overall, patients in the fall had a lower ICU mortality rate (27.4% vs 38.4%, difference, -11.0; 95%CI: -6.4, -18.2), shorter length of stay on the mechanical ventilator (7 d vs 11 d, difference, 4 d; 95%CI: 2.1, 6.6) and shorter ICU length of stay (9 d vs 14 d, difference, 5 d; 95%CI: 2.7, 9.4). CONCLUSION: Patients admitted with severe COVID-19 infection requiring mechanical ventilation had better outcomes in the fall than summer. This difference observed is likely attributable to a better understanding of the condition and advances in treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
In-hospital acute kidney injury (IH-AKI) has been reported in a significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 and is associated with increased disease burden and poor outcomes. However, the mechanisms of injury are not fully understood. We sought to determine the significance of race on cardiopulmonary outcomes and in-hospital mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with AKI. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients hospitalized in Grady Health System in Atlanta, Georgia between February and July 2020, who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) on qualitative polymerase-chain-reaction assay. We evaluated the primary composite outcome of in-hospital cardiac events, and mortality in blacks with AKI versus non-blacks with AKI. In a subgroup analysis, we evaluated the impact of AKI in all blacks and in all non-blacks. Of 293 patients, effective sample size was 267 after all exclusion criteria were applied. The mean age was 61.4 ± 16.7, 39% were female, and 75 (28.1%) had IH-AKI. In multivariable analyses, blacks with IH-AKI were not more likely to have in-hospital cardiac events (aOR 0.3, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.04-1.86, p = 0.18), require ICU stay (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.20-3.25, p = 0.75), acute respiratory distress syndrome (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.16-3.65, p = 0.74), require mechanical ventilation (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.12-2.10, p = 0.35), and in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.26-7.50, p = 0.70) when compared to non-blacks with IH-AKI. Regardless of race, the presence of AKI was associated with worse outcomes. Black race is not associated with higher risk of in-hospital cardiac events and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who develop AKI. However, blacks with IH-AKI are more likely to have ARDS or die from any cause when compared to blacks without IH-AKI.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , COVID-19 , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Middle Aged , Race Factors , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We surveyed a cohort of patients who recovered from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection to determine the COVID-19 vaccination rate. We also compared the willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccine before and after its availability to assess changes in perception and attitude towards vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recovered patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in the ICU at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were followed up over a 1-year period to assess vaccine acceptability and acceptance rates, and changes in perception towards COVID-19 vaccination before and after vaccine availability. RESULTS: A total of 98 and 93 patients completed the initial and follow up surveys respectively. During the initial survey, 41% of the patients intended to receive vaccination, 46% responded they would not accept a vaccine against COVID-19 even if it were proven to be 'safe and effective 'and 13% undecided. During the follow up survey, 44% of the study cohort had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Major reasons provided by respondents for not accepting COVID-19 vaccine were lack of trust in the effectiveness of the vaccine, pharmaceutical companies, government, vaccine technology, fear of side effects and perceived immunity against COVID-19. Respondents were more likely to be vaccinated if recommended by their physicians (OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.8-8.3), employers (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-5.8), and family and friends (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-4.5). CONCLUSION: We found a suboptimal COVID-19 vaccination rate in a cohort of patients who recovered from severe infection. COVID-19 vaccine information and recommendation by healthcare providers, employers, and family and friends may improve vaccination uptake.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , COVID-19 Vaccines , Critical Illness , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , VaccinationABSTRACT
Proximal left main stenting in symptomatic patients with flow-limiting stenosis is an alternative revascularization strategy in individuals with low syntax score and high operative risk. Stent dislodgement is associated with adverse cardiovascular events and retrieval of fully deployed stents is generally prohibited as it increases the risk of severe complications. Stent dislodgement and entrapment in the femoral vascular system occur infrequently during percutaneous coronary interventions. In this report, we illustrate a prompt and safe transcatheter technique to successfully retrieve an expanded and dislodged coronary stent entrapped in the common femoral artery without need for a more invasive surgical approach.