[Consultative psychiatry in the general practice]. / Consultatieve psychiatrie in de huisarts­praktijk.

BACKGROUND: The high demand for mental health care is increasing the pressure on Dutch basic and specialized mental health care. Consultative psychiatry in primary care may help to support primary mental health care. These consultations are increasingly used nationwide. However, little is known about how this help takes shape in practice and what the experiences of both patients and caregivers are. METHOD: We carried out a database and file study into the characteristics of the patients who received psychiatric consultation, in which we also examined the consultation questions of the general practitioners (GP) and the given advice. In addition, 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with patients, general practitioners, mental healthcare nurse practitioners and psychiatrists, after which the transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically. AIM: To explore for which patients the GP requests a psychiatric consultation, what the consultation questions are and the advice given, and to identify the experiences of patients and healthcare providers with consultative psychiatry in general practice. RESULTS: The database study showed that consultative psychiatry was mainly used for patients with a psychiatric history, multiple psychiatric diagnosis and current psychopharmaceutical use. The consultation question usually concerned medication or treatment advice. In addition to advice regarding the consultation question, the psychiatrist often gave additional advice. Consultative psychiatry was experienced positively by both health care providers and patients due to the low threshold of the general practice, the mutual trust that is involved, the short waiting times compared to the second and third line psychiatry and the expertise of the psychiatrist. CONCLUSION: Consultative psychiatry in general practice is widely applicable, but is mainly applied to patients with multiple psychiatric diagnoses and current psychopharmaceutical use. It is experienced as positive by both patients and healthcare providers.

A randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of Fit after COVID, a cognitive behavioural therapy targeting severe post-infectious fatigue following COVID-19 (ReCOVer): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) results in debilitating long-term symptoms, often referred to as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC), in a substantial subgroup of patients. One of the most prevalent symptoms following COVID-19 is severe fatigue. Prompt delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), an evidence-based treatment that has shown benefit in reducing severe fatigue in other conditions, may reduce post-COVID-19 fatigue. Based on an existing CBT protocol, a blended intervention of 17 weeks, Fit after COVID, was developed to treat severe fatigue after the acute phase of infection with SARS-CoV-2. METHOD: The ReCOVer study is a multicentre 2-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of Fit after COVID on severe post-infectious fatigue. Participants are eligible if they report severe fatigue 3 up to and including 12 months following COVID-19. One hundred and fourteen participants will be randomised to either Fit after COVID or care as usual (ratio 1:1). The primary outcome, the fatigue severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-fatigue), is assessed in both groups before randomisation (T0), directly post CBT or following care as usual (T1), and at follow-up 6 months after the second assessment (T2). In addition, a long-term follow-up (T3), 12 months after the second assessment, is performed in the CBT group only. The primary objective is to investigate whether CBT will lead to a significantly lower mean fatigue severity score measured with the CIS-fatigue across the first two follow-up assessments (T1 and T2) as compared to care as usual. Secondary objectives are to determine the proportion of participants no longer being severely fatigued (operationalised in different ways) at T1 and T2 and to investigate changes in physical and social functioning, in the number and severity of somatic symptoms and in problems concentrating across T1 and T2. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial testing a cognitive behavioural intervention targeting severe fatigue after COVID-19. If Fit after COVID is effective in reducing fatigue severity following COVID-19, this intervention could contribute to alleviating the long-term health consequences of COVID-19 by relieving one of its most prevalent and distressing long-term symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL8947 . Registered on 14 October 2020.

Clinical empathy in GP-training: Experiences and needs among Dutch GP-trainees. "Empathy as an element of personal growth".

OBJECTIVE: Clinical empathy has been described as a key component of effective person-centeredness in patient-physician communication. Yet little is known about general practitioner (GP) trainees' experiences and opinions regarding clinical empathy, empathy-education and the development of empathic skills. This study aimed to explore trainees' experiences with clinical empathy during GP training. METHODS: This study used focus group interviews. GP trainees at two Dutch universities were approached by e-mail. Focus groups were conducted between April and November 2018. Six focus groups were conducted: two with starting trainees, two with trainees at the end of their first year and two with trainees at the end of their 3 years' training. Two experienced qualitative researchers analyzed the focus groups. During the thematic analysis the differences and similarities between the various stages of education were taken into account and a framework for the identified themes and subthemes was developed. RESULTS: Thirty-five GP trainees took part. Four main themes could be identified. Starting trainees experienced frictions regarding the influence of personal affective reactions on their medical competencies. Trainees at the end of their first year indicated that they reached a balance between empathic involvement and their responsibility to carry out relevant medical tasks, such as following GP guidelines. Trainees at the end of their three years' training recognized the mutual relationship between the development of the behavioral part of clinical empathy and personal growth. All trainees stated that their needs concerning education changed during their GP training and proposed changes to the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: GP trainees face various obstacles in developing empathic skills and behavior. Particularly they mention handling personal affective reactions. Trainees express a clear wish for clinical empathy, in its theoretical as well as its skill and emotional aspects, to play a central role in the curriculum. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: More explicit attention to be paid to empathy by embedding theoretical education, explicit attention to skill training and assessment of empathic behavior by patients and supervisors.

Psychiatric characteristics of older persons with medically unexplained symptoms: A comparison with older patients suffering from medically explained symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Empirical studies on the clinical characteristics of older persons with medically unexplained symptoms are limited to uncontrolled pilot studies. Therefore, we aim to examine the psychiatric characteristics of older patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) compared to older patients with medically explained symptoms (MES), also across healthcare settings. METHODS: A case-control study including 118 older patients with MUS and 154 older patients with MES. To include patients with various developmental and severity stages, patients with MUS were recruited in the community (n = 12), primary care (n = 77), and specialized healthcare (n = 29). Psychopathology was assessed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview) and by dimensional measures (e.g., psychological distress, hypochondriasis, and depressive symptoms). RESULTS: A total of 69/118 (58.5%) patients with MUS met the criteria for a somatoform disorder according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, with the highest proportion among patients recruited in specialized healthcare settings (p = 0.008). Patients with MUS had a higher level of psychological distress and hypochondriasis compared to patients with MES. Although psychiatric disorders (beyond somatoform disorders) were more frequently found among patients with MUS compared to patients with MES (42.4 vs. 24.8%, p = 0.008), this difference disappeared when adjusted for age, sex, and level of education (odds ratio = 1.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.0-3.0], p = 0.070). CONCLUSIONS: Although psychological distress is significantly higher among older patients with MUS compared to those with MES, psychiatric comorbidity rates hardly differ between both patient groups. Therefore, treatment of MUS in later life should primarily focus on reducing psychological distress, irrespective of the healthcare setting patients are treated in.

Training residents in patient-centred communication and empathy: evaluation from patients, observers and residents.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centred communication and empathy are key enablers for patient-centred care. However, several studies suggest a downward trend regarding the empathic communication skills of physicians during medical residency. It is known that communication training can have a positive effect on patient-centred communication, empathy and relational skills. Training residents in patient-centred communication and empathy can be an opportunity to improve the patient-centred care. To evaluate the training a tri-focal perspective will be used. METHODS: A 3-day training was developed to improve residents' patient-centred communication and empathy skills at an academic medical health centre, in the Netherlands. The training included: (1) the basics of patient-centred communication and empathy (through presentations, scientific literature), (2) practicing with actors, and (3) reflecting on residents' video recorded consultations (by themselves and communication experts). A pilot study with a pre-post design was conducted to evaluate the training from patient and observer perspectives. Semi-structured interviews were used to get insight into residents' perspective. Nine residents from different specialities followed the training and enrolled in the pilot study. During two random days consultations between residents and patients were video recorded. Patients were asked to fill in two questionnaires, indicating their perspective on residents' empathy and communication skills before as well as after the consultation. All video recorded consultations were coded to rate residents' communication skills, empathy, computer use and agenda-setting. Statistical analysis were performed using multilevel analysis. RESULTS: A total of 137 eligible patients took part in the pilot study. Trained residents showed significant improvement in patient-rated empathy scores. According to observers, residents' computer use improved significantly after the training. The communication skills of trained residents did not improve significantly. Agenda setting by residents showed a downward trend. Almost all residents were satisfied with the training, especially with the video-feedback. CONCLUSIONS: A brief training significantly increased residents' empathy scores according to patients and significantly decreased residents' computer use according to observers. These findings indicate that the quality of patient-centred care can be improved by integrating patient-centred communication into residency programs, at an academic medical health centre. The ultimate goal is to structurally embed the training in residents' education program.

The development of an ICF-based questionnaire for patients with chronic conditions in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: We developed a self-reported questionnaire for patients in primary care with chronic conditions aged 50 years or older. The questionnaire supports a more person-centered approach by adopting a biopsychosocial focus on functional status instead of a focus on disease. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), an ICF Primary Care set for patients with chronic conditions was constructed in three phases. In the first phase, we identified relevant ICF categories for the ICF Primary Care set by using existing ICF sets for chronic health conditions. The ICF Primary Care set was completed by a multidisciplinary expert panel and consisted of 52 ICF categories covering ICF's body functions, activities, participation, environmental factors, and personal factors. In the last phase, we constructed a draft version of the questionnaire by converting the ICF categories from the ICF Primary Care set into questions and corresponding scales. To improve the draft version of the questionnaire, we conducted cognitive interviews with patients with chronic conditions in an iterative process, focusing on the problems patients experienced in answering the items of the questionnaire. Interview analysis was used for assessing the content and construct validity of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty cognitive interviews with patients were conducted in five different interview rounds. In these interviews, we identified 124 problems in the responding process of answering the questionnaire, mostly concerning difficulties with the comprehension of the constructs of the questions. The number of problems reduced from an average of 11 problems per interview in the first round to an average of two problems in the last round. CONCLUSION: Conclusion: The final version of the questionnaire demonstrated high content and construct validity (i.e., patients are well capable of describing their functional status in terms of ICF) and is applicable in primary care in the Netherlands.

[Approaching psychological problems like a general practitioner]. / Psychische problemen benaderen als een huisarts.

An important cause of the high prescription levels of psychotropic medication for psychological symptoms is that these symptoms are assessed according to the same model as applied for physical symptoms, the disease model. This has led to a one-sided medical approach to psychological symptoms. A person-centred approach offers an alternative; the positive aspects of the disease-centred approach are retained and attention for the patient and his/her context become the central focal point for the general practitioner. Important elements of the person-centred approach are empathy, a good doctor-patient relationship, a shared approach to problem definition and understanding of the patient's problem, development of a therapeutic alliance, and a focus on the patient's hopes and expectations. If additional primary care-based treatment by mental health practice nurses is indicated, this model could be suitable since it is based on patients' strengths and focuses on personal growth rather than reduction of symptoms.

Health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities-A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience health disparities and are less likely to undergo recommended age- and gender-specific screening and health promotion. New diagnoses are frequently missed. Assessments with the aid of health assessment instruments are a way to address these problems. AIM: The aim of this review is to find the available health assessment instruments for people with ID used in primary care and evaluate their quality. METHODS: We conducted an electronic literature search of papers published between January 2000 and May 2016. After a two-phase selection process (kappa: 0.81 and 0.77) we collected data from the 29 included peer-reviewed articles on the following four domains; development, clinimetric properties (i.e. validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability), content (i.e. ID-related health problems, prevention and health promotion topics) and effectiveness of the instruments. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: We distinguished 20 different health assessment instruments. Limited information was found on the development of the instruments as well as on their clinimetric properties. The content of the instruments was rather diverse. The included papers agreed that health assessment instruments are effective. However, only three instruments evaluated effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial. Patients with ID, carers and general practitioners (GPs) generally appreciated the health assessment instruments. IMPLICATION: Two instruments, "Stay well and healthy -Health risk appraisal (SWH-HRA)"and the "Comprehensive Health Assessment Programme (CHAP)", appeared to have the highest quality. These instruments can be used to construct a health assessment instrument for people with ID that meets scientific standards.

[Depression prevention in primary care is not worthwhile]. / Depressiepreventie in de eerste lijn is niet zinvol.

An increasing number of prevention programmes are being introduced in primary and secondary care. Patients seldom doubt the usefulness of these programmes, but doctors more frequently do. Primary care programmes for prevention of depression require a high level of effort, but are not very effective: the incidence of new depressive episodes is relatively low, and there is a high percentage of drop-outs from intervention programmes. We need to look critically at the ever increasing expansion of screening and prevention activities in the general practitioner's (GP's) practice, because the fuller the GP's agenda the less time there is for the patient's personal story.

Substitution scenario in follow-up of chronic cancer patients in primary care: prevalence, disease duration and estimated extra consultation time.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cancer as well as survival rates for it are increasing. It is debated whether care in the chronic phase of cancer can be positioned in primary care due to doubts about capacity and workload. OBJECTIVE: To estimate GPs' extra consultation time if they assume responsibility for the care in the chronic phase of cancer. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study. Estimation of extra consultation time by quantifying prevalence, incidence, survival, number of chronic cancer patients, current practice contacts and registration of risk factors in patients with all types of cancers. RESULTS: The most prevalent types of cancer (with 5-year survival rates) are as follows: breast cancer (91.5%), colorectal cancer (63.8%), prostate cancer (78.3%), melanoma (91.9%) and bladder and urinary tract cancer (77.3%). Primary care practices include ~32 chronic cancer patients, with a potential extra consultation time of ~19 hours per year per 1000 patients. One-third (35%) are already in a chronic disease management programme and 57% were diagnosed >5 years ago. Registration of risk factors for cancer is incomplete, but of better quality when comorbidity is present. CONCLUSION: Numbers of chronic cancer patients and possible time investment by primary care professionals in the case of a substitution scenario should not be a limiting factor for transition of follow-up from secondary to primary care, as most of the patients were diagnosed >5 years ago and a large proportion of these patients are already monitored in an existing chronic care programme.

Course and prognosis of myasthenia gravis: a systematic review.

The clinical course of myasthenia gravis (MG) is variable, and spontaneous remission is still uncommon. Knowledge of the prognostic factors may help understand the course of MG and thus optimize its management. A systematic review search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for English language studies from 1985 through 2009. We identified additional studies by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles and hand search main journal of neurology. Studies evaluating variables associated with or predictive of remission in adult patients with MG were included. Because of methodological heterogeneity, we refrained from statistical pooling, instead, a best evidence synthesis was used for summarizing the results. From 1810 potentially relevant studies, 13 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were heterogeneous considerably in sample size, disease duration, follow-up years, definition of remission, and analysis. Study quality was limited by retrospective design in most studies and lack of multivariate analysis. Time of diagnosis from onset (<1 year) showed strong evidence of predicting a better remission. In studies using completely stable remission outcomes, there was strong evidence that age at onset (<40 years) was of prognostic importance. Furthermore, gender showed no association with remission. Time of diagnosis from onset and age at onset were found to be predictors of remission. Gender does not seem to predict the course of MG. Our findings should be interpreted with caution because of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of included studies.

[The practice guideline 'Bacterial skin infections' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice]. / De standaard 'bacteriële huidinfecties' (eerste herziening) van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap; reactie vanuit de huisartsgeneeskunde.

The revised guideline 'Bacterial skin infections' from the Dutch College ofGeneral Practitioners offers a clear and extensive overview of the most prevalent superficial and deep bacterial infections in general practice. Given the lack of evidence, it is no longer recommended to keep children with impetigo out of school or daycare centres. Erysipelas and cellulitis are now considered variants of the same bacterial infection and require the same therapy. Due to its rising prevalence, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus should also be considered. In conclusion, the guideline is a practical and evidence-based tool for the diagnosis, education and treatment of bacterial skin infections.

Abdominal symptoms: do they disappear after cholecystectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones on preoperative abdominal symptoms. METHODS: A systematic search was made of the Medline database in combination with reference checking. Articles were excluded if patients aged <18 years, symptom relief rates could not be calculated, if follow-up after cholecystectomy was less than 1 month, or when the included patients were at extraordinary risk for a complicated outcome. Potential differences in relief rates due to patient selection, retrospective versus prospective design, duration of follow-up, or intervention were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The pooled relief rate for "biliary pain" was high 92% (95% confidence interval 86 to 96%). Symptom relief rates were consistently higher in studies that included acute cholecystectomies. For upper abdominal pain--without restrictions for intensity or duration--pooled relief rates ranged from 72% (66 to 77%) after elective cholecystectomy, to 86% (83 to 91%) after acute cholecystectomy. The relief rate of food intolerance was higher in studies with a follow-up < or =12 months (88%, 76 to 91%) compared to studies with a follow-up of more than 12 months (65%, 55 to 74%). CONCLUSION: In almost all patients with gallstones biliary pain disappeared after cholecystectomy. There is insufficient evidence, however, that this relief was due to cholecystectomy. Relief rates of other isolated symptoms were low in patients with an elective cholecystectomy. A proper evaluation of the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in terms of abdominal symptom relief rates requires a randomized trial.