ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Analysis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) cases, gynaecological implications, referral reasons to gynaecologist and treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, longitudinal, single-centre study with female CAH paediatric patients ≥ 10 years-old, followed between 1998-2018 in gynaecology and endocrinology departments at a public university tertiary hospital. RESULTS: 47 patients, 34.0% (n = 16) with classic, 66.0% (n = 31) with non-classic forms (NCAH), CYP21 deficit and 46,XX karyotype. We found a normal median menarche age (11.5 IQR 2 [6-15] years-old), but significantly earlier in NCAH (p = 0.003). Precocious puberty occurred in 48.9%, n = 23. Primary amenorrhea occurred in salt-wasting form (21.4%, n = 3). Oligomenorrhea and hirsutism were significantly more prevalent in NCAH (p = 0.018, p = 0.014 respectively) and acanthosis nigricans and virilization signs in classic forms (p = 0.05, p = 0.000 respectively). Sixteen patients (34.0%) were referred to gynaecology, mostly due to menstrual irregularities (50.0%, n = 8). Medical treatment with isolated or combined corticoids, oestrogen and progestogen were chosen in all but one case. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues were used in 19.0% (n = 9). Surgery was performed in 34.0% (n = 16) patients, median age 2.0 IQR 2.5 (0.6-90) years-old. CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Early treatment contributes to a phenotypical feminine differentiation and normalization of the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis, which is essential given the gynaecologic and obstetric consequences of untreated cases.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Ovarian surgical ablation (OSA) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is usually performed to halt ovarian function in premenopausal patients. Since alternative pharmacological therapy exists and few studies have investigated why surgery is still performed, we aimed to analyze the reasons for the use of OSA despite the remaining controversy. Materials and Methods: Premenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients treated at a tertiary center (2005-2011) were selected, and patients with germline mutations were excluded. Results: Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Globally, the main reasons for OSA included: continued menstruation despite hormone therapy with or without ovarian medical ablation (OMA) (34.2%), patient informed choice (31.6%), disease progression (16.5%), gynecological disease requiring surgery (13.9%), and tamoxifen intolerance/contraindication (3.8%). In women aged ≥45 years, patient choice was significantly more frequently the reason for OSA (47.4% versus 17.1% (p = 0.004)). For those aged <45 years, salvation attempts were significantly more frequent as compared to older women (26.8% versus 5.3% (p = 0.01)). In 77.8% of women undergoing OSA with menstrual cycle maintenance, surgery was performed 1-5 years after diagnosis, while surgery was performed earlier (0-3 months after diagnosis) in patients undergoing OSA as an informed choice (56.0%), as a salvation attempt (53.8%), or due to gynecological disease (63.6%). The leading reason for OSA in women previously undergoing OMA was continued menstruation (60.0%). Conclusions: This study suggests a possible failure of pharmacological ovarian suppression and reinforces the need for shared decision-making with patients when discussing treatment strategies, although validation by further studies is warranted due to our limited sample size.
