Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 41(5): 575-584, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28258834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase the risk of Clostridium difficile infections. There are interactions between gut microbiota and innate immune cells including neutrophils. We evaluated the effect of treatment with omeprazole on the gut microflora and neutrophil function. METHODS: In 50 patients, we evaluated the effect of 4-week omeprazole treatment (n=25 with 20mg per day and n=25 with 20mg twice daily) on intragastric pH, results of stool culture and lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT) and neutrophil function. RESULTS: The treatment caused significant increase of the mean intragastric pH, especially in the group with 20mg omeprazole twice daily (from 2.05±0.59 to 5.06±1.6, P<0.001). In LHBT, the increase of hydrogen concentration was observed in higher percentage of patients with 20mg of omeprazole twice daily, compared to patients with the lower dose (42.1% vs 29.4%; ns). Four weeks of omeprazole treatment have caused considerable changes in stool culture results. Patients treated with higher dose of omeprazole have had some tendency to decrease diversity of colonic microflora in comparison with patients treated with the lower dose of omeprazole. Treatment with omeprazole did not result in C. difficile positive stool culture and had no significant effect on neutrophil function. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole treatment have caused considerable changes in stool culture results. Patients treated with the higher dose had some tendency to decreased diversity of colonic microflora and towards changes in fermenting bacteria of the gut. The potential effect of omeprazole on gut microflora does not depend on neutrophil function deterioration.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome/radiation effects , Neutrophils/drug effects , Neutrophils/physiology , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
Acta Biochim Pol ; 62(4): 859-66, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26637375

ABSTRACT

An increase in the antibiotic resistance among Enterococcus faecium strains has been observed worldwide. Moreover, this bacteria has the ability to produce several virulence factors and to form biofilm that plays an important role in human infections. This study was designed to compare the antibiotic resistance and the prevalence of genes encoding surface protein (esp), aggregation substance (as), surface adhesin (efaA), collagen adhesin (ace), gelatinase (gelE), and hialuronidase (hyl) between biofilm-producing and non-producing E. faecium strains. Therefore, ninety E. faecium clinical isolates were tested for biofilm-forming ability, and then were assigned to two groups: biofilm-positive (BIO(+), n =70) and biofilm-negative (BIO(-), n = 20). Comparison of these groups showed that BIO(+) isolates were resistant to ß-lactams, whereas 10% of BIO(-) strains were susceptible to ampicillin (statistically significant difference, p = 0.007) and 5% to imipenem. Linezolid and tigecycline were the only antibiotics active against all tested isolates. Analysis of the virulence factors revealed that ace, efaA, and gelE genes occurred more frequently in BIO(-) strains (ace in 50% BIO(+) vs. 75% BIO(-); efaA 44.3% vs. 85%; gelE 2.9% vs. 15%, respectively), while hyl gene appeared more frequently in BIO(+) isolates (87.1% BIO(+) vs. 65% BIO(-)). These differences were significant (p < 0.05). We concluded that BIO(+) strains were more resistant to antibiotics than BIO(-) strains, but interestingly, BIO(-) isolates were characterized by possession of higher virulence capabilities.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Enterococcus faecium/pathogenicity , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Genes, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Virulence
3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 256028, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26339599

ABSTRACT

An increase in the antibiotic resistance among members of the Enterobacteriaceae family has been observed worldwide. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative rods are increasingly reported. The treatment of infections caused by Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae has become an important clinical problem associated with reduced therapeutic possibilities. Antimicrobial carbapenems are considered the last line of defense against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Unfortunately, an increase of carbapenem resistance due to the production of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzymes has been observed. In this study we describe the ability of E. coli to produce carbapenemase enzymes based on the results of the combination disc assay with boronic acid performed according to guidelines established by the European Community on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the biochemical Carba NP test. Moreover, we evaluated the presence of genes responsible for the production of carbapenemases (bla KPC, bla VIM, bla IMP, bla OXA-48) and genes encoding other ß-lactamases (bla SHV, bla TEM, bla CTX-M) among E. coli isolate. The tested isolate of E. coli that possessed the bla KPC-3 and bla TEM-34 genes was identified. The tested strain exhibited susceptibility to colistin (0.38 µg/mL) and tigecycline (1 µg/mL). This is the first detection of bla KPC-3 in an E. coli ST479 in Poland.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/biosynthesis , Carbapenems/metabolism , Escherichia coli/genetics , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Colistin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli/pathogenicity , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Minocycline/pharmacology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/genetics , Tigecycline , beta-Lactamases/genetics
4.
Folia Histochem Cytobiol ; 46(2): 137-42, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18519228

ABSTRACT

Since about twenty years, following the introduction into therapeutic of news beta-lactam antibiotics (broad-spectrum cephalosporins, monobactams and carbapenems), a very significant number of new beta-lactamases appeared. These enzymes confer to the bacteria which put them, the means of resisting new molecules. The genetic events involved in this evolution are of two types: evolution of old enzymes by mutation and especially appearance of new genes coming for some, from bacteria of the environment. Numerous mechanisms of enzymatic resistance to the carbapenems have been described in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The important mechanism of inactivation carbapenems is production variety of b-lactam hydrolysing enzymes associated to carbapenemases. The metallo-beta-enzymes (IMP, VIM, SPM, GIM types) are the most clinically significant carbapenemases. P. aeruginosa posses MBLs and seem to have acquired them through transmissible genetic elements (plasmids or transposons associated with integron) and can be transmission to other bacteria. They have reported worldwide but mostly from South East Asia and Europe. The enzymes, belonging to the molecular class B family, are the most worrisome of all beta-lactamases because they confer resistance to carbapenems and all the beta-lactams (with the exception of aztreonam) and usually to aminoglycosides and quinolones. The dissemination of MBLs genes is thought to be driven by regional consumption of extended--spectrum antibiotics (e.g. cephalosporins and carbapenems), and therefore care must be taken that these drugs are not used unnecessarily.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/metabolism , Metals/metabolism , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzymology , beta-Lactam Resistance , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , beta-Lactamases/classification , beta-Lactamases/genetics , beta-Lactams/chemistry , beta-Lactams/metabolism , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
5.
Przegl Lek ; 63(7): 529-32, 2006.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17203802

ABSTRACT

The microbiological monitoring in the Intensive Care Units, in the last few years, revealed a significant increase of infections caused by Gram+ bacteria. Authors of multi-center studies focus upon the problems related to the treatment of the infections caused by the methicilline-resistant staphylococci (MRS) as well as to its spreading. The Staphylococcal infections were 26.6 % of all bacterial infections in the Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of the Medical Academy in Bialystok, during one year observation. MRS rods counted 21.4% among all pathogens isolated from the specimens collected from the patients, undergoing the treatment in the ICU, and were responsible for 83.6% of all Staphylococcal infections. The analysis revealed the significant percentage MRS rods resistant to commonly used empirical antibiotic therapy. Our experience shows that vancomycin or linezolid should be used, as an empirical antibiotic therapy, in suspected MRS-caused severe infections along with the simultaneous monitoring of changes in G+ bacteria drug resistance and strict infection-control regime.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Humans , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Poland/epidemiology , Species Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL