Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 139 Suppl 1: 4-16, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29218711

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore what "quality of care" means to childbearing women in Nigeria and Uganda, as a means of ensuring that women's voices and opinions are prioritized when developing interventions to improve quality in maternity care provision. METHODS: Qualitative methods, with a purposive sample of women in Nigeria and Uganda. Participants were asked to define quality of care and to provide examples of when it was and was not provided. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize findings based on an a priori framework (the WHO quality of care framework). RESULTS: 132 in-depth interviews and 21 focus group discussions are included. Participants spontaneously discussed each of the WHO framework domains of quality of care. Data were richest across the domains of effective communication, respect and dignity, emotional support, competent and motivated human resources, and essential physical resources. Women believed that good quality of care ensured optimal psychological and physiological outcomes for the woman and her baby. Positive interpersonal relationships between women and health providers were important. These included supportive care, building rapport, and using positive and clear language. CONCLUSION: To provide good quality of care, maternity services should consider and act on the expectations and experiences of women and their families.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Maternal Health Services/standards , Parturition/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Quality of Health Care , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Nigeria , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Uganda
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 139 Suppl 1: 27-37, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29218719

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To improve women's childbirth experiences in health facilities, their psychosocial and communication needs have to be met. However, what constitutes these specific needs is poorly understood, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper explores women's needs for communication and emotional support during facility-based childbirth. METHODS: Qualitative research was conducted in a large referral maternity hospital and its catchment communities in Akure, Nigeria. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among women of reproductive age, midwives, doctors, and facility administrators. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize findings, and then interpreted within the context of this study and existing quality of care framework. RESULTS: Forty-two IDIs and 10 FGDs are included in this analysis. Participants reported such needs as communication in simple words in local language by healthcare staff, having their husbands as birth companions, spiritual support, and prayers from family members and healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: To increase, improve, and sustain facility-based childbirth in Nigeria, health systems should appreciate the uniqueness and importance of each woman's needs during childbirth. Practical and sustainable actions should be taken to meet these needs, within the confines of the acceptable sociocultural norms.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Communication , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Parturition/psychology , Adult , Catchment Area, Health , Family , Female , Focus Groups , Health Facilities , Humans , Midwifery/methods , Midwifery/standards , Nigeria , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Referral and Consultation , Religion , Spouses , Young Adult
3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 139 Suppl 1: 17-26, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29218726

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore current practices, challenges, and opportunities in relation to monitoring labor progression, from the perspectives of healthcare professionals in low-resource settings. METHODS: Thematic analysis of qualitative data (in-depth interviews [IDIs] and focus group discussions [FDGs]) obtained from a purposive sample of healthcare providers and managers in selected health facilities in Nigeria and Uganda. RESULTS: A total of 70 IDIs and 16 FGDs with doctors, midwives, and administrators are included in this analysis. Labor monitoring encompasses a broad scope of care jointly provided by doctors and midwives. A range of contextual limitations was identified as barriers to monitoring labor progression, including staff shortages, lack of team cooperation, delays in responding to abnormal labor observations, suboptimal provider-patient dynamics, and limitations in partograph use. Perceived opportunities to improve current practices included streamlining clinical team cooperation, facilitating provider-client communication, encouraging women's uptake of offered care, bridging the gaps in the continuum of monitoring tasks between cadres, and improving skills in assessment of labor progress, and accuracy in its documentation. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers face many challenges to effective monitoring of labor progress in low-resource settings. This analysis presents potential opportunities to improve labor monitoring practices and tools in these contexts.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Fetal Monitoring/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Labor, Obstetric/psychology , Adult , Female , Fetal Monitoring/standards , Focus Groups , Health Facilities , Humans , Midwifery/standards , Nigeria , Perception , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Uganda
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 139 Suppl 1: 47-55, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29230800

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: "Negotiated standards" describe a level of quality of care that is acceptable and achievable within a specific health system, based on consensus between key stakeholders. This paper presents the development of negotiated standards for effective labor and childbirth care in selected hospitals and communities in Nigeria and Uganda. METHODS: A four-step development process involving different methodologies. The process included: (1) review and synthesis of internationally recognized intrapartum clinical principles and practices; (2) primary qualitative research to assess values and preferences of women and healthcare providers, and practices that align with these preferences; (3) draft contextualization of effective and ineffective behaviors to reflect values and preferences; and (4) WHO-mediated negotiations between relevant stakeholders, including community members, providers, and administrators. RESULTS: The primary outcomes of this process were a comprehensive set of effective behaviors and clinical practices covering the main domains of quality of care, which are practical and easy to communicate, implement, and audit across all levels of healthcare delivery. CONCLUSION: The process demonstrates that health facilities and providers can be motivated to adopt standards of care that uphold the values and preferences of both service users and providers, while adhering to international best practices.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery, Obstetric/standards , Health Facilities/standards , Maternal Health Services/standards , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Labor, Obstetric/psychology , Negotiating , Nigeria , Parturition/psychology , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Quality of Health Care/standards , Uganda
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...