Impact of dose distribution by a 3D planning system for brachytherapy with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: There has been no study in which the correlation between clinical results and dosimetry based on a 3D treatment planning system in patients with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer was evaluated. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who were treated with 198Au grains for head and neck cancer were reviewed. Twenty-five patients were treated with brachytherapy alone and seven patients were treated with a combination of brachytherapy and neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy. RESULTS: With a median observation period of 60 months, the 5-year local control rate was 82.9%. V85Gy of CTV in patients with local recurrence tended to be lower than that in patients without local recurrence (p = 0.07). The maximum dose of the keratinized gingiva in patients in whom bone exposure occurred was significantly higher than that in patients in whom bone exposure did not occur (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dose distribution with 198Au grains can predict local control and late adverse events.

Lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases.

Lymphopenia is a well-known side effect of radiotherapy and has been shown to have a negative impact on patient outcomes. However, the extent of lymphopenia caused by palliative radiotherapy and its effect on patient prognosis has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and to determine their effects on patients' survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis for patients who underwent palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and could be followed up for 12 weeks. Lymphocyte counts were documented at baseline and throughout the 12-week period following the start of radiotherapy and their medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were recorded. Exploratory analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for lymphopenia and its impact on overall survival (OS). A total of 282 cases that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The median baseline lymphocyte count was 1.26 × 103/µl (IQR: 0.89-1.72 × 103/µl). Peak lymphopenia occurred at a median of 26 days (IQR: 15-45 days) with a median nadir of 0.52 × 103/µl (IQR: 0.31-0.81 × 103/µl). Long-term analysis of patients surviving for 1 year showed that lymphopenia persisted at 1 year after radiotherapy. The main irradiation site, radiation field length and pretreatment lymphocyte count were significantly related to grade 3 or higher lymphopenia. Lymphopenia was identified as a significant predictor of OS by multivariate Cox regression analysis. This study demonstrated the incidence of lymphopenia after palliative radiotherapy for vertebral metastases and its effect on patients' OS.

Beginning of clinical treatment using the 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system in Japan: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: In the field of radiation therapy, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) technology has been gradually improving and highly accurate radiation treatment has been possible. Research on IGRT using 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) began in 1999, and a radiation therapy device called 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac), which combines a linear accelerator with 1.5 Tesla MRI, was developed in Europe. The aim of this review is to present an overview of 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac with a review of the literature and our experience. Methods: Reports related to 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac were searched for in PubMed and are discussed in relation to our experience. Key Content and Findings: The 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac enables IGRT using 1.5 Tesla MRI, further enhancing the precision of radiation therapy. Position verification by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is performed in many institutions, but soft tissue contrast is often unclear in CBCT images of the abdomen and mediastinal organs. Since the 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac allows position verification using MRI, position verification can be performed using clear MRI even in regions where CBCT is unclear. With the 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac, it is possible to perform online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) using 1.5 Tesla MRI. Online ART is a method in which images are acquired while the patient is on the treatment table. The method is based on the current condition of the organs in the body on that day and an optimal treatment field is recreated. Additionally, it allows monitoring of tumor motion using cine images obtained by 1.5 Tesla MRI during the delivery of X-ray radiation. A previous report showed that patients with prostate cancer who received radiotherapy by MR-Linac had fewer side effects than those in patients who received conventional CBCT radiation therapy. Conclusions: The 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac obtained CE-mark certification in Europe in August 2018 and it has been used for clinical treatment. In Japan, clinical treatment using this device started in 2021. By using 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac, patients can be provided with higher precision radiotherapy. In this review, we provide an overview of 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac.

A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Who Were Treated with Radiotherapy Alone.

Introduction: Patients with esophageal cancer who are in a poor general condition receive radiotherapy alone, but outcomes are often unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to clarify recent outcomes of radiotherapy alone for esophageal cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent 50 Gy or more of radiotherapy without chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included. The median follow-up period was 17.9 months. The 5-year OS, DSS, LC, and PFS rates were 33.2%, 49.8%, 46.2%, and 16.8%, respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, clinical stage was a significant predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-11.17, p = 0.001), DSS (HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.43-3.12, p = 0.0001), LC (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.28-2.74, p = 0.001), and PFS (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.25-2.18, p = 0.0004). Radiation dose was a significant predictor for LC (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97, p = 0.018) and tumor location was a significant predictor for PFS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.10-2.19, p = 0.018). In subgroup analysis, the 5-year OS, DSS, LC, and PFS rates for stage I were 60.0%, 80.0%, 71.9%, and 46.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Stage, radiation dose, and tumor location are significant predictors for outcomes. Patients with stage I esophageal cancer can be cured by radiotherapy alone.

Survival prediction nomogram for patients with vertebral bone metastases treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Background: In the treatment of vertebral bone metastases, estimating patient prognosis is important to select the optimal treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors for vertebral bone metastases treated with palliative radiotherapy and to establish a nomogram for predicting patient survival. Materials and methods: We analyzed patients who underwent palliative radiotherapy for vertebral bone metastasis between January 2010 and December 2020 at a single institution. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) primary bone malignancy, (2) stereotactic body radiotherapy, (3) concurrent radiotherapy to sites other than the vertebral bone, (4) radiotherapy to other sites within 12 weeks before or after the current radiotherapy, and (5) lack of more than half of blood test data before radiotherapy. Results: A total of 487 patients met the inclusion criteria. Clinical and hematologic data were collected from the patient record system. Patients were divided into training and test groups in a 7:3 ratio. Multivariate Cox regression analysis in the training cohort revealed six significant factors, including a history of chemotherapy, primary site (breast cancer, prostate cancer, or hematologic malignancy), use of analgesics, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, serum albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase. A prognostic nomogram was developed and validated in the test cohort. The area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting survival at 6, 24, and 60 months were 0.83, 0.88, and 0.88 in the training cohort and 0.85, 0.81, and 0.79 in the test cohort, respectively. Conclusions: This nomogram may help to select the treatment strategy for vertebral bone metastases.