ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize the management of asthma in children and to highlight different guideline-based approaches. This review also discusses literature regarding the use of corticosteroids, both inhaled and systemic, as well as biologic agents, in asthma management. SUMMARY: Asthma is a common chronic respiratory condition in the pediatric population and has evolved into a highly patient-specific disease. Of the 2 main asthma guidelines, one developed by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was recently published as a focused update in 2020. The other, from the Global Initiative for Asthma, focuses on a global strategy for management and prevention, with the most recent update in 2023. Both reports discuss diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of asthma in adults and children. Treatment is designed as a stepwise approach in both reports, although there are key differences. This article focuses on gaps in these guidelines, including the use of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids with single maintenance and reliever therapy and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in children. It also reviews treatment in children under 5 years of age, although recommendations are limited due to a lack of evidence in this age group. Finally, this review discusses considerations for emerging treatments, including biologics, for patients who are difficult to treat. CONCLUSION: New treatment strategies and agents have emerged in the treatment of pediatric asthma. Pharmacists play a key role in providing education about, dispensing, and recommending the newest evidence-based treatment options for children.
Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Adult , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Pharmacists , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Administration, InhalationABSTRACT
Vaccines are a daycare and school requirement for children. The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act 3rd amendment grants pharmacists and pharmacy interns the capability to vaccinate children at ages 3-18 years according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices schedule of recommended vaccines. Before this, only some state boards of pharmacy allowed pharmacists to administer pediatric vaccines. Despite these opportunities, immunization training programs lack the comprehensive training of pediatric vaccines and administration for pharmacists and pharmacy interns without additional financial cost. All pharmacists should be adequately trained and pharmacies be reimbursed to provide vaccines to all ages of pediatric patients. Advocacy is necessary to ensure children have reliable, affordable, and convenient access to lifesaving vaccines today and after the PREP Act expires.
Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmacies , Pharmacy , Vaccines , Humans , Child , Pharmacists , Vaccination , ImmunizationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current literature for direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in pediatric patients and summarize ongoing trials. SUMMARY: In treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients, evidence supports use of both dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran has been shown to be noninferior to standard of care (SOC) in terms of efficacy, with similar bleeding rates. Similarly, treatment with rivaroxaban in children with acute VTE resulted in a low recurrence risk and reduced thrombotic burden, without increased risk of bleeding, compared to SOC. Treatment of pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis as well as central venous catheter-related VTE with rivaroxaban appeared to be both safe and efficacious and similar to that with SOC. Dabigatran also has a favorable safety profile for prevention of VTE, and rivaroxaban has a favorable safety profile for VTE prevention in children with congenital heart disease. Many studies with several different DOACs are ongoing to evaluate both safety and efficacy in unique patient populations, as well as VTE prevention. CONCLUSION: The literature regarding pediatric VTE treatment and prophylaxis is growing, but the need for evidence-based pediatric guidelines remains. Additional long-term, postauthorization studies are warranted to further elucidate safety and efficacy in clinical scenarios excluded in clinical trials. Additional data on safety, efficacy, and dosing strategies for reversal agents are also necessary, especially as the use of DOACs becomes more common in the pediatric population.
Subject(s)
Rivaroxaban , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Child , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Administration, OralABSTRACT
Clostridioides difficile infection guidelines were published in final format on April 1, 2018. Among 4962 and 3545 C. difficile infection cases in children the year before and after publication, oral metronidazole use decreased from 63.0% to 44.3% (P < 0.001) and oral vancomycin use increased from 27.3% to 47.7% (P < 0.001). Quarterly metronidazole utilization decreased postguidelines among 117 institutions, incidence rate ratios 0.86 (95% confidence intervals: 0.78-0.96).
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Utilization/standards , Humans , Infant , Metronidazole , VancomycinABSTRACT
The study investigated the safety and efficacy of two antithrombin III (ATIII) products in pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) by performing a retrospective analysis of patients who received either recombinant ATIII (rATIII) or human-derived ATIII (hATIII). Twenty-two patients were included in the study from January 2014 to September 2015 and all received unfractionated heparin (UFH) as anticoagulation during ECMO. In total, 86 doses of ATIII were included in the analysis in which 37 doses (43%) were rATIII and 49 doses (57%) were hATIII. Unfractionated heparin rates were also evaluated for all cases (n = 86) at 24 hours post-ATIII supplementation. The UFH rate decreased after the administration of both types of ATIII. However, neither the reduction in UFH rate between the two ATIII products (p = 0.52) nor the UFH rates pre- and post-ATIII supplementation at 24 hours (p = 0.08) reached statistical significance. There was a significant difference in cost favoring the rATIII product (p < 0.0001). An ad-hoc estimation of waste associated with ATIII supplementation showed >$100,000 in financial loss of unused drug. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of ATIII supplementation in pediatric ECMO.
