Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 66(2): 135-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26819154

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of osteoformin on mineralisation and quality of the new bone formation during rapid distraction osteogenesis. METHODS: This multi-centre study was conducted at the Karadeniz Technical University, Middle East Technical University and Selcuk University. The experimental study was conducted from January 2010 to September 2012 and comprised New-Zealand rabbits that were randomly divided into three groups. In group I distraction rate was 1 mm/day while in groups II and III distraction rates were 2mm/day and 1 mm/day. In groups I and II 100µg/kg osteoformin was injected after the latency period. Distraction region was evaluated by radiological, histomorphometrical and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analyses. SPSS 17 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 18 rabbits with each of three groups having 6(33.3%). Accelerated bone healing was noted in groups I and II compared with group III (p<0.05). No significant differences were indicated between groups I and II (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Local injection of osteoformin was effective in the craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Further experimental studies are recommended before using osteoformin on humans.


Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Fracture Healing/drug effects , Mandible , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Peptides/administration & dosage , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Animals , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Disease Models, Animal , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/metabolism , Mandible/surgery , Rabbits , Radiography/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 30(8): 438-43, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22779421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the bone mineral density (BMD) of bone formed through distraction osteogenesis (DO) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). BACKGROUND DATA: LIPUS and LLLT are noninvasive supporting treatment concepts used for wound healing. LIPUS has been used to accelerate bone healing through the therapeutic effect arising from piezoelectric and angiogenetic effects on cell membranes. LLLT known as "photobiomodulation" is used in the treatment of soft and hard tissue injuries. METHODS: The study was conducted with 15 New Zealand rabbits randomly divided into three groups of 5 according to treatment, as follows: Group A: DO was performed with no further treatment; Group B: DO was performed followed by 30 mW/cm(2) LIPUS at 1 Mhz for 20 min/day during the distraction period; Group C: DO was performed followed by 25 mW/cm(2) LLLT at 650 nm for 10 min/day during the distraction period. DEXA was used to examine the treated areas prior to surgery and at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean BMD values at both 30 and 60 days postoperatively were below the baseline level, whereas they were above at the same time intervals in the LIPUS group. In the LLLT group, the mean BMD value at 30 days postoperatively was below the baseline level, whereas it was above the baseline level at 60 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: LIPUS and LLLT applied during the distraction period accelerated the DO treatment.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Mandible/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Osteogenesis/radiation effects , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Wound Healing/radiation effects , Absorptiometry, Photon , Animals , Bone Density , Osteotomy , Rabbits , Random Allocation
3.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 66(10): 2042-9, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18848100

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Bisphosphonates are used for inhibiting bone resorption in several diseases. In this experimental study, the effects of alendronate on the mandibular distraction gap in rabbits at 2 different rates were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed using 15 New Zealand white rabbits. Group 1 consisted of animals with distraction at the rate of 1 mm/day. Group 2 consisted of animals with distraction at the rate of 2 mm/day. These experimental groups had a postoperative alendronate injection during the first 3 days of their distraction phase. Group 3 consisted of animals with distraction at the rate of 1 mm/day, without alendronate injections. Distraction was performed on only the left sides of all animals until a gap of 10 mm was achieved. On postoperative day 45, the animals were sacrificed, and the mandibles of all animals were evaluated radiographically and histologically, and with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Radiographic images were also evaluated using transmission densitometry (TD). RESULTS: Histologically, bone healing was found to be significantly accelerated in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 (P < .05). Bone healing was superior in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant compared with group 1. The TD results revealed no statistical difference between experimental groups, whereas the results for group 2 showed significantly denser osteogenic formation in the distraction gap compared with group 3. There was a significant increase in mean bone mineral density in the experimental groups compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Histologic, TD, and DEXA results showed that alendronate injections during the distraction phase may be effective in accelerating new bone formation in the distraction gap in rabbit mandibles. The TD results also support the concept that an administration of alendronate may allow a 2 mm/day elongation instead of 1 mm/day in the rabbit mandible.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Wound Healing/drug effects , Absorptiometry, Photon , Animals , Male , Mandible/surgery , Prospective Studies , Rabbits , Random Allocation , Statistics, Nonparametric
4.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 123(6): 620-3, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12806339

ABSTRACT

The prevalence and rank of order of 4 otologic complaints in 200 temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients, as well as the relationship between the complaints and TMD subgroups, were investigated and compared with an asymptomatic control group. No subjective otologic complaints were reported by 45 (22.5%) TMD patients; the remaining 155 (77.5%) patients had at least 1 otologic complaint. Otalgia, tinnitus, vertigo, and hearing loss were reported by 63.6%, 59.1%, 50%, and 36.4%, respectively, of the subjects with myofascial pain and dysfunction; by 46.1%, 44.2%, 32.5%, and 22% of the patients with internal derangement; and by 62.5%, 45.8%, 41.6%, and 20.8% of the patients with both myofascial pain and dysfunction and internal derangement. However, the incidence of otalgia (8%), tinnitus (26%), vertigo (14%), and hearing loss (14%) was found to be lower for the control group. Statistically, the control group had fewer otologic complaints. Patients in the TMD groups had high incidences of otologic complaints compared with the control subjects without TMD signs or symptoms. Aural symptoms in patients with internal derangement or myofascial pain and dysfunction, or their combination, were nonspecific.


Subject(s)
Ear Diseases/etiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Chi-Square Distribution , Earache/etiology , Female , Hearing Disorders/etiology , Humans , Joint Dislocations/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/complications , Tinnitus/etiology , Vertigo/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL