Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(4): 1803-1809, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416233

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Bracing for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a treatment option to prevent curve progression to surgical level. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 3D fully customized over corrective brace, "ScoliBrace," an orthosis treatment for AIS. METHODS: This was a prospective pilot study of AIS female patients with inclusion criteria followed recommended Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Guidelines. Cobb angles measured at: baseline (T0), 21 months (T5-2), skeletal maturity (T6), 6 months post-brace (T7), along with hours of brace wear using a thermal sensor and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the SRS-22r questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 30 female AIS patients with mean age 11.85 ± 0.68 years, predominantly Risser 0 (70%), and median Cobb angle 29° were recruited; 21 patients were included for the final analysis. Results showed significant difference in Cobb angle between T0 and T5-2 (median = 22.5° vs. 28.5°, p = 0.0082). 57.14% had reduction in Cobb angle by ≥ 5° at skeletal maturity. Cobb angle reduced 0.794° for each additional hour of dosage (p = 0.036, 95% CI = - 1.532°, - 0.056°). Although pain level was increased at T6 (4.37 ± 0.51vs.4.70 ± 0.41, p = 0.014), patients reported significantly greater satisfaction with management of their condition (3.90 ± 0.90vs.3.29 ± 0.88, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Results show similar findings to the BRAIST study, whereby curves remained under surgical threshold and showed improvement. More than half had curve reduction of ≥ 5° at skeletal maturity. Increased dose was also associated with improved outcomes. Using "ScoliBrace" as a non-surgical treatment, maintained curves below surgical threshold and showed curve reduction, improving patient satisfaction with management.


Subject(s)
Braces , Quality of Life , Scoliosis , Humans , Scoliosis/therapy , Female , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Child , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Patient Satisfaction
2.
Singapore Med J ; 60(4): 183-187, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246214

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Stable distal radius fractures in children are frequently treated by immobilisation with a cast and heal readily without complications. This randomised clinical trial aimed to assess patient satisfaction and casting-related clinical outcomes when using polyolefin cast, a new cast material, compared to the conventional fibreglass cast. METHODS: A total of 80 patients (age range 7-16 years) with radiograph-confirmed stable distal radius fractures were recruited. They were randomised to either the fibreglass group or polyolefin group, with short arm cast immobilisation for 20-30 days. After cast removal, the incidence of skin rash, growth of hair and cast breakage was recorded along with the administration of patient satisfaction questionnaires. Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test was applied to compare results. RESULTS: Overall, 34 patients from the fibreglass group and 31 patients from the polyolefin group were included in the final analysis. Significantly fewer patients from the polyolefin group reported itchiness during the casting period (p = 0.038). However, significantly more cast breakages were observed for the polyolefin group in the palmar bar region (p = 0.009). Patients from the polyolefin group were overall more satisfied (fibreglass group = 3.15/5 vs. polyolefin group = 3.74/5; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Polyolefin cast reduces itchiness during casting and provides higher overall patient satisfaction during the treatment of stable distal radius fractures in children in tropical climates. However, patients should be counselled regarding potential cast breakage, which did not compromise safety, and the higher costs involved.


Subject(s)
Casts, Surgical , Radius Fractures/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Female , Glass , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Polyenes , Singapore , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(7): 597-602, 2014 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24695927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous pins used in the surgical fixation of fractures in children are often removed in the outpatient clinic without the administration of analgesia. Pin removal can be a cause of anxiety for children, parents, and caregivers. Relatively little is known about the requirement of analgesia for this procedure. In a randomized controlled trial, we evaluated whether oral acetaminophen or ibuprofen reduced the pain experienced during pin removal. METHODS: Participating in the study were 240 children between the ages of five and twelve years who had two or three percutaneous pins in the elbow following treatment of a supracondylar humeral fracture or a lateral humeral condyle fracture with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The patients were randomized into one of three groups (n = 80) allocated to receive acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or vitamin C (placebo) an hour before pin removal. A pain score was obtained and heart rate measured before pin removal, immediately following the procedure, and ten minutes after pin removal. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among the study groups in terms of the demographic data of sex, age, side of injury, or number of pins. Pain score and heart rate did not exhibit differences that were either statistically significant or clinically relevant. The change from baseline did not differ significantly among the groups for either measure at either of the follow-up times post pin removal. Immediately after pin removal, the mean difference in pain score (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) between the acetaminophen group and the ibuprofen group was 0.10 (-1.03 to 1.23); between the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, 0.35 (-0.78 to 1.48); and between the ibuprofen group and the placebo group, 0.25 (-0.88 to 1.38). The CIs excluded a clinically relevant difference. Pain scores and heart rates returned to preprocedural baseline levels within ten minutes following pin removal. CONCLUSIONS: Neither acetaminophen nor ibuprofen significantly reduced the pain score or heart rate associated with percutaneous pin removal in children as compared with the placebo. The oral analgesics administered were clinically equivalent to the placebo. These results suggest that non-narcotic analgesia use does not significantly reduce pain or heart rate associated with percutaneous pin removal in children.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Bone Nails , Device Removal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Pain/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Male , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL