Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Rheumatol ; 42(10): 2833-2839, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37407906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of national population-based studies on polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM) readmissions in the USA. In this study, we aim to describe the rates, reasons for readmissions, and characteristics of readmissions for adults hospitalized for PM/DM in the USA. METHODS: We analyzed the 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). We included index hospitalizations for all adult DM/PM patients with a principal diagnosis of PM/DM using ICD-10 codes. We excluded elective and traumatic readmissions. Using a "rank" command in STATA, the most common specific principal diagnosis of readmissions was outlined. Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline characteristics between readmissions and index hospitalizations. STATA 16 was used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1610, 1286, and 842 index hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of PM/DM, that were discharged alive, were included in the 30-, 90-, and 180-day readmission analysis, respectively. Among these, 193 (12%), 276 (21.5%), and 240 (28.5%) were readmitted within 30, 90, and 180 days, respectively. PM and sepsis were the most common reasons for reasons across the 3 timeframes. 30-day readmissions were responsible for an aggregate of 4.1 million US dollars in total hospital cost and 1518 hospital days in 2018. Compared to index hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions have higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, severe-extreme loss of function, obesity, and deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSION: About a third of PM/DM hospitalized patients are readmitted within 180 days. Readmissions constitute a significant economic burden to the health care system. PM and sepsis are the main reasons for readmissions. Key points • About a third of polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM) hospitalized patients are readmitted within 180 days • PM and sepsis are the main reasons for readmissions. • Readmissions of PM/DM Patients constitute a significant economic burden to the health care system. • Compared to index hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions have higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, severe-extreme loss of function, obesity, and deep venous thrombosis.


Subject(s)
Dermatomyositis , Polymyositis , Sepsis , Venous Thrombosis , Adult , Humans , Dermatomyositis/epidemiology , Dermatomyositis/diagnosis , Patient Readmission , Polymyositis/epidemiology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Obesity , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Cureus ; 15(5): e38982, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37313079

ABSTRACT

Background There are limited studies analyzing cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) hospitalizations. In this study, we aimed to analyze baseline demographics of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and CLE patients, identify the most common reasons for hospitalizations, and find out the hospitalization outcomes.  Materials and methods We performed the analysis using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2016 and 2019. For the CLE cohort, data for adults aged 18 years and older with the primary or secondary diagnosis of CLE using International Classification of Disease - 10th revision (ICD-10) codes were extracted. For comparison, the SLE cohort was identified by patients aged 18 years and older with primary or secondary diagnoses of SLE using ICD-10 codes. Chi-squared test was used to compare baseline demographic characteristics. Multivariable logistic and linear regression was used to calculate outcomes of interest. Results In comparison to the SLE cohort, the CLE cohort was not only older in age and lower percentage female, but also had shorter length of stay, less total hospital charge, and the majority had Medicare as primary insurance. The SLE cohort included predominantly African American patients while the CLE cohort was majority Caucasian patients. The cardiovascular risks were more prevalent in the CLE cohort and most commonly admitted for sepsis, cardiovascular disease, and mental health disorders. Conclusion Our study highlights the importance of outpatient follow-up in CLE patients to closely monitor cardiovascular risk factors, early identification of infections, and routine mental health screenings to reduce hospitalizations and resource utilization.

4.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35121, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36945258

ABSTRACT

Background There is scarcity of national level data on the reasons for Emergency Department (ED) presentation among patients with Giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the United States. This study aims to outline the most common reasons for ED presentation among these patients, and the baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits principally for GCA.  Materials and methods We obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) 2018 database. Each ED visit in the NEDS has a principal diagnosis (the main reason for the visit) and can have up to 34 other secondary diagnoses. We searched for ED visits for patients aged ≥50 with any diagnosis of GCA using ICD-10 codes. The most common principal discharge diagnoses were divided into organ systems, and specific principal discharge diagnoses were recorded for ED visits among patients with GCA in descending order of frequency. We then outlined baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. Results There were 20,886 ED visits for patients with GCA in 2018. Infections, as well as rheumatologic and cardiovascular disease were the most common reasons for ED presentation, and GCA was the most common specific principal discharge diagnosis for ED visits. There were 3888 ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. These patients were predominantly elderly females, admitted, Medicare insured, with minimal comorbidity burden, and presented to metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south. Conclusion GCA patients are most likely to present to the ED due to their underlying GCA. Infections and CV are also common reasons for presentation to the ED.

5.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35038, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36942165

ABSTRACT

Background Long-term longitudinal studies on giant cell arteritis (GCA) hospitalizations are limited. Here we aim to fill gaps in knowledge by analyzing longitudinal trends of GCA hospitalizations over the last two decades in the United States (U.S.). Materials and methods We performed a 21-year longitudinal trend analysis of GCA hospitalizations using data obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 1998 and 2018. Using the NIS database, we searched for hospitalizations for patients aged ≥ 50 years with a principal diagnosis of GCA using ICD billing codes. The principal diagnosis was the main reason for hospitalization. We used all hospitalizations in patients without GCA aged ≥50 years as the control population. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis was utilized to calculate the adjusted p-trend for outcomes of interest. Results The incidence of GCA hospitalization remained stable at about one per 100,000 U.S. persons throughout the study period. There was no statistically significant change in the inpatient mortality for the GCA group during the study period (adjusted p-trend=0.111). In comparison, inpatient mortality reduced from 4.4% to 3.1% from 1998 to 2018 (adjusted p-trend <0.0001) in the control group. The proportion of whites reduced, while the proportion of racial minorities increased over time in both the GCA and control groups. Conclusion The non-GCA control population saw significant reductions in mortality over time, but unfortunately, the GCA group did not see such improvements. More research into additional treatment modalities for inpatient GCA management may help improve mortality.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...