Atezolizumab as the First Systemic Therapy Approved for Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of atezolizumab (Tecentriq) for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older with unresectable or metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS). DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE databases, published abstracts, and ongoing studies from ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 1981, and May 31, 2023. Keywords included atezolizumab, Tecentriq, MPDL3280, immunotherapy, PD-L1, PD-1, pediatrics, sarcoma, and ASPS. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language studies involving atezolizumab for ASPS were included and discussed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Atezolizumab is an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody designed to block the interaction between PD-L1 and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor. Atezolizumab was granted approval by the FDA specifically for ASPS based on a phase II clinical trial in adult and pediatric patients (n = 49), which reported an overall response rate of 24% and a durable response rate at 6 and 12 months of 67% and 42%, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse reactions include musculoskeletal pain (8%), followed by hypertension (6%), weight gain (6%), headache (4%), and dizziness (4%). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS: Advanced ASPS is a high-risk disease with limited treatment options. Atezolizumab appears to be a viable treatment option in ASPS demonstrating clinical efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: With no other treatments that are FDA approved specifically for ASPS, and few demonstrating efficacy in the advanced setting, the approval of atezolizumab, including the first approval for pediatric patients, represents a landmark improvement to the therapeutic arsenal against this rare disease.

Defining appropriate quality performance metrics for pharmacies dispensing oral oncology therapies.

Pharmacy benefit managers use measures like the medication possession ratio (MPR) as a performance/quality metric to evaluate specialty pharmacies and assess direct and indirect remuneration clawback fees. Abundant evidence shows that measuring MPR does not correlate with patients' experiences while on oral cancer oncolytics and does not accurately reflect their clinical outcomes. The authors demonstrate that as an alternative to MPR, the Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute's Rx To Go in-house pharmacy offers value; it uses a multifaceted approach to comprehensively evaluate the services that specialty oncology pharmacies provide to patients with cancer who are being treated with oral oncolytics.