Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 147: 17-24, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Key and core components of effective infection prevention and control programmes (IPCPs) issued by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have been described. WHO core component 1 relates to the structure, organization and management of IPCPs. AIM: The objective of this study was to assess the status and the time trends of some indicators of core component 1 of IPCPs in acute hospitals in Spain throughout the period 2012-2022. METHODS: Hospital-level data from the Spanish point prevalence survey for years 2012-2022 were analysed. Core component 1 indicators were calculated and tested for association to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). In addition, trends were also examined. RESULTS: Overall, 67.0% and 57.2% of Spanish hospitals reported having an annual infection prevention and control (IPC) plan and an annual IPC report that was approved by the hospital managing director, respectively. The global median number of full-time equivalent (FTE) IPC nurses per 250 beds for the period was 0.87 and the global median number of FTE IPC doctors was 0.70. The rates of blood cultures and stool tests for Clostridioides difficile were 39.9 and 6.1 per 1000 patient-days, respectively. No significant correlation was found between core component 1 indicators and HAI prevalence. CONCLUSION: Spain is currently at a basic level on the structure, organization and management of IPCPs. Profound differences were found between hospitals depending on size and type.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Infection Control , World Health Organization , Spain/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 138: 19-26, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption is an important component of control strategies to tackle antimicrobial resistance. AIM: To evaluate the consumption of antimicrobials using six indicators proposed by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. METHODS: Point prevalence survey data on antimicrobial use in Spanish hospitals throughout the period 2012-2021 were analysed. A descriptive analysis of each indicator by year was performed globally and by hospital size. A logistic regression model was used to identify significant time trends. FINDINGS: In all, 515,414 patients and 318,125 antimicrobials were included. The prevalence of antimicrobial use remained stable throughout the study period (45.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 45.6-45.8). Percentages of antimicrobials for systemic use and those administered parenterally showed a small and significant increasing trend (odds ratio (OR): 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.02; and OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.03, respectively). Small improvements were found in the percentages of antimicrobials prescribed for medical prophylaxis and with the reason for use documented in patients' medical records (-0.6% and 4.2%, respectively). The percentage of surgical prophylaxis prescribed for more than 24 h shows a significant improvement, decreasing from 49.9% (95% CI: 48.6-51.3) in 2012 to 37.1% (95% CI: 35.7-38.5) in 2021. CONCLUSION: During the last decade, Spanish hospitals have had a stable but high prevalence of antimicrobial use. Little to no improvement has been made in most of the indicators analysed, except for a reduction in the prescription of surgical prophylaxis for more than 24 h.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Drug Prescriptions , Humans , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Hospitals , Surveys and Questionnaires , Prevalence , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
3.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 31: e28, 2022 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35485802

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Longitudinal data on the mental health impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic in healthcare workers is limited. We estimated prevalence, incidence and persistence of probable mental disorders in a cohort of Spanish healthcare workers (Covid-19 waves 1 and 2) -and identified associated risk factors. METHODS: 8996 healthcare workers evaluated on 5 May-7 September 2020 (baseline) were invited to a second web-based survey (October-December 2020). Major depressive disorder (PHQ-8 ≥ 10), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7 ≥ 10), panic attacks, post-traumatic stress disorder (PCL-5 ≥ 7), and alcohol use disorder (CAGE-AID ≥ 2) were assessed. Distal (pre-pandemic) and proximal (pandemic) risk factors were included. We estimated the incidence of probable mental disorders (among those without disorders at baseline) and persistence (among those with disorders at baseline). Logistic regression of individual-level [odds ratios (OR)] and population-level (population attributable risk proportions) associations were estimated, adjusting by all distal risk factors, health care centre and time of baseline interview. RESULTS: 4809 healthcare workers participated at four months follow-up (cooperation rate = 65.7%; mean = 120 days s.d. = 22 days from baseline assessment). Follow-up prevalence of any disorder was 41.5%, (v. 45.4% at baseline, p < 0.001); incidence, 19.7% (s.e. = 1.6) and persistence, 67.7% (s.e. = 2.3). Proximal factors showing significant bivariate-adjusted associations with incidence included: work-related factors [prioritising Covid-19 patients (OR = 1.62)], stress factors [personal health-related stress (OR = 1.61)], interpersonal stress (OR = 1.53) and financial factors [significant income loss (OR = 1.37)]. Risk factors associated with persistence were largely similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the prevalence of probable mental disorders among Spanish healthcare workers during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic was similarly high to that after the first wave. This was in good part due to the persistence of mental disorders detected at the baseline, but with a relevant incidence of about 1 in 5 of HCWs without mental disorders during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. Health-related factors, work-related factors and interpersonal stress are important risks of persistence of mental disorders and of incidence of mental disorders. Adequately addressing these factors might have prevented a considerable amount of mental health impact of the pandemic among this vulnerable population. Addressing health-related stress, work-related factors and interpersonal stress might reduce the prevalence of these disorders substantially. Study registration number: NCT04556565.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Pandemics
4.
J Psychiatr Res ; 149: 10-17, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35217315

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers (HCW) are at high risk for suicide, yet little is known about the onset of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) in this important segment of the population in conjunction with the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a multicenter, prospective cohort study of Spanish HCW active during the COVID-9 pandemic. A total of n = 4809 HCW participated at baseline (May-September 2020; i.e., just after the first wave of the pandemic) and at a four-month follow-up assessment (October-December 2020) using web-based surveys. Logistic regression assessed the individual- and population-level associations of separate proximal (pandemic) risk factors with four-month STB incidence (i.e., 30-day STB among HCW negative for 30-day STB at baseline), each time adjusting for distal (pre-pandemic) factors. STB incidence was estimated at 4.2% (SE = 0.5; n = 1 suicide attempt). Adjusted for distal factors, proximal risk factors most strongly associated with STB incidence were various sources of interpersonal stress (scaled 0-4; odds ratio [OR] range = 1.23-1.57) followed by personal health-related stress and stress related to the health of loved ones (scaled 0-4; OR range 1.30-1.32), and the perceived lack of healthcare center preparedness (scaled 0-4; OR = 1.34). Population-attributable risk proportions for these proximal risk factors were in the range 45.3-57.6%. Other significant risk factors were financial stressors (OR range 1.26-1.81), isolation/quarantine due to COVID-19 (OR = 1.53) and having changed to a specific COVID-19 related work location (OR = 1.72). Among other interventions, our findings call for healthcare systems to implement adequate conflict communication and resolution strategies and to improve family-work balance embedded in organizational justice strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Humans , Incidence , Organizational Culture , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Social Justice , Spain/epidemiology , Suicidal Ideation
6.
Sangre (Barc) ; 44(5): 327-34, 1999 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10618908

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is, first, to know the actual situation of the perioperatory red cell transfusion for elective surgery in our hospital. In a second phase and prospectively, we tested guidelines for red cell perioperatory transfusion in order to observe the change of transfusions. Then, we compared the results between the basal and postintervention periods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed an aleatory assay with two periods, basal and interventionist. Basal period: 151 patients undergoing elective surgery with perioperatory blood requested and general anesthesia. Intervention period: We applied a transfusion guidelines protocol for perioperatory red cell transfusion from the Hospital's Transfusion Committee, also a questionnaire to evaluate the medical indication; We studied 164 patients with clinical features like the basal period. Study/results variables: preoperative blood request, perioperatively transfusion, number of packed red-cell units transfused, crossmatch--to--transfusion ratio, haemoglobin level pre and posttransfusion. RESULTS: No significant drop of the cross match-transfusion ratio was observed after intervention. There is a slight reduction of the crossmatch--to--transfusion ratio, although these value is high (4.48), due to an increase of the transfusion keeping the percentage of appropriate transfusions. The most frequent reason (53%) of inadequate transfusion is the active bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: 1) The transfusional activity of the Marina Alta Hospital supposes approximately 17% of the request and 6% of the global transfusion. 2) The introduction of a protocol of perioperative transfusion instructions suppose a small decrease of the crossmatch--to--transfusion ratio, without statistical significance. This slight reduction is due to an increase of transfusion in the post-intervention period, since in this period there is a group of older age patients and with greater percentage of associated pathology. 3) The rate of appropriate transfusions in both periods is similar. 4) The preoperative request of red cells is inappropriate. 5) The most frequent reason of inappropriate transfusion is active bleeding.


Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Loss, Surgical , Erythrocyte Transfusion/standards , Erythrocyte Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forms and Records Control , Health Policy , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hospitals, Community/standards , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Hemorrhage/therapy , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies
7.
Gac Sanit ; 8(44): 229-38, 1994.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7860185

ABSTRACT

The need to combine several files in order to create a cohort of opiate addicts, sufficiently large for the analysis of its mortality, requires use of the probabilistic method of record linkage. This study is a preliminary phase in which two sub-files of the Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) Register of toxicological emergencies are linked. This phase served to adapt probabilistic record linkage to our files, develop computer programs, define agreement criteria, and evaluate the validity and performance of the method. In order to safeguard confidentiality, identification variables were limited to sex, birth date and three initial letters from each surname. The automated probabilistic linkage was seen to be feasible, valid and efficient; in contrast to deterministic approaches, sensitivities and specificities above 95% were obtained with visual reviewing of under 5% of the records. Difficulties encountered during the process are discussed.


Subject(s)
Cohort Studies , Medical Record Linkage , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Confidentiality , Female , Humans , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...