ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate how the publication of the targeted temperature management (TTM) trial in December 2013 affected the trends in temperature management and outcome following admission to UK intensive care units (ICUs) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: We used a national ICU database of 1,181,405 consecutive admissions to 235 adult ICUs. OHCA admissions mechanically ventilated in the first 24â¯h in the ICU were divided into a pre-TTM trial cohort of patients admitted before publication of the TTM trial (January 2010-December 2013) and post-TTM cohort of patients admitted after TTM trial publication (January 2014-December 2017). The primary outcome variables were lowest temperature in the first 24â¯h in ICU and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: The lowest temperature recorded in the first-24â¯h of admission was significantly higher in the post-TTM cohort (nâ¯=â¯18,106) than in the pre-TTM cohort (nâ¯=â¯12,162) (mean 34.7 (±1.6) versus 33.6⯰C (±1.8); absolute difference 1.12⯰C (95% CI 1.08-1.16). The post-TTM cohort had a greater prevalence of fever (>38.0⯰C) (24.8% vs 14.7%; (odds ratio (OR) 1.91 (95% CI 1.80-2.03); pâ¯<â¯0.001)) and higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality (63.7% vs 61.6%). In a multilevel model, accounting for time trend and including site as a random effect, neither the step change in acute hospital mortality following publication of the TTM trial result (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95-1.15; pâ¯=â¯0.37), nor the change in slope (from OR 1.00 per year, 95% CI 0.97-1.04, to 1.04 per year, 95% CI 1.02-1.07; pâ¯=â¯0.059), was statistically significant. Adjusted analyses were limited by the models' dependence on temperature and temperature-related variables. CONCLUSIONS: The lowest temperature recorded in the first-24â¯h of admission in OHCA patients was higher in the post-TTM cohort compared with the pre-TTM cohort. There has been an increase in the proportion of patients with fever (>38⯰C) in the first 24â¯h. Although crude mortality was slightly higher in the post-TTM cohort, an analysis accounting for time trend and variation between critical care units, found no significant change associated with the TTM publication.
Subject(s)
Body Temperature , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Hypothermia, Induced , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Unplanned intensive care admission is a devastating complication of lung resection and is associated with significantly increased mortality. We carried out a two-year retrospective national multicentre cohort study to investigate the influence of anaesthetic and analgesic technique on the need for unplanned postoperative intensive care admission. All patients undergoing lung resection surgery in 16 thoracic surgical centres in the UK in the calendar years 2013 and 2014 were included. We defined critical care admission as the unplanned need for either tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, and sought an association between mode of anaesthesia (total intravenous anaesthesia vs. volatile) and analgesic technique (epidural vs. paravertebral) and need for intensive care admission. A total of 253 out of 11,208 patients undergoing lung resection in the study period had an unplanned admission to intensive care in the postoperative period, giving an incidence of intensive care unit admission of 2.3% (95%CI 2.0-2.6%). Patients who had an unplanned admission to intensive care unit had a higher mortality (29.00% vs. 0.03%, p < 0.001), and hospital length of stay was increased (26 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Across univariate, complete case and multiple imputation (multivariate) models, there was a strong and significant effect of both anaesthetic and analgesic technique on the need for intensive care admission. Patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia (OR 0.50 (95%CI 0.34-0.70)), and patients receiving epidural analgesia (OR 0.56 (95%CI 0.41-0.78)) were less likely to have an unplanned admission to intensive care after thoracic surgery. This large retrospective study suggests a significant effect of both anaesthetic and analgesic technique on outcome in patients undergoing lung resection. We must emphasise that the observed association does not directly imply causation, and suggest that well-conducted, large-scale randomised controlled trials are required to address these fundamental questions.