Evaluation of Social Determinants of Health on Dysphagia Care Pathways at a Tertiary Care Facility.

OBJECTIVES: Limited research exists evaluating the impact of social determinants of health in influencing care pathways for patients with dysphagia. A better understanding of whether these determinants correlate to altered care and resource utilization is essential as it relates to patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: All adult patients seen at a tertiary midwestern hospital were screened for ICD codes of dysphagia diagnoses from 2009 to 2019. Demographic information was collected from these patients with dysphagia including sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance status. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess referral pattern rates and types of diagnostic interventions ordered (none, videofluoroscopic swallow study, esophagram, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy). RESULTS: A total of 31,858 patients with dysphagia were seen at our institution during the study period, with a majority being female (56.36%), Caucasian (79.83%), and publicly insured (63.16%), at a median age of 60.35 years. There were no significant care delivery pattern differences based on geography/zip code analyses. African American patients were significantly more likely to have imaging or interventions performed (odds ratio [OR] 1.463, p = 0.005). Patients with public insurance also had higher rates of diagnostic study utilization (OR 1.53, p = 0.01). Only 3% of all patients with dysphagia were seen by laryngologists. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were seen in dysphagia evaluation modalities based on zip code analyses surrounding this tertiary care facility. African American patients and those with public insurance had significantly higher utilization of subsequent testing and intervention for dysphagia care. Further studies are necessary to delineate causes and outcome differences for these measurable differences in dysphagia care pathways. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1139-1146, 2024.

Impact of Demographics and Clinical Features on Initial Treatment Pathway for Vestibular Schwannoma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify demographic and clinical features impacting initial treatment pathway for vestibular schwannoma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma between 2009 and 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, or microsurgical resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: χ 2 Test, one-way analysis of variance, and multivariate logistic regression were used to correlate demographic and clinical factors with initial treatment pathway for 197 newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma patients. RESULTS: Among 197 patients, 93 (47%) were initially treated with observation, 60 (30%) with stereotactic radiation (Gamma Knife) and 44 (22%) with surgical resection. Age univariately had no statistically significant impact on initial pathway, but those undergoing surgery trended toward a younger demographic (49.1 yr [surgery] versus 57.2 yr [observation] versus 59.0 yr [Gamma Knife]). Men were more likely to be initially observed than women ( p = 0.04). Patients initially observed were more likely to have a lower Koos classification ( p < 0.001) and have better tumor-ear hearing ( p = 0.03). Only 34.4% of patients living outside the local geographic region were initially observed compared with 53.0% living locally ( p = 0.055). Surgeon correlated with initial treatment ( p = 0.04) but did not maintain significance when adjusting for hearing level or tumor size. A multiple linear regression model found age, maximum tumor diameter, and Koos class to correlate with initial treatment pathway ( p < 0.0001, r2 = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Initial treatment pathway for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma is impacted by demographic factors such as age, sex, and geographic proximity to the medical center. Clinical features including hearing level and tumor size also correlated with initial treatment modality.