Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
2.
Eye (Lond) ; 37(2): 274-279, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35022568

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Handheld fundus cameras are portable and cheaper alternatives to table-top counterparts. To date there have been no studies comparing feasibility and clinical utility of handheld fundus cameras to table-top devices. We compare the feasibility and clinical utility of four handheld fundus cameras/retinal imaging devices (Remidio NMFOP, Volk Pictor Plus, Volk iNview, oDocs visoScope) to a table-top camera (Zeiss VisucamNM/FA). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Healthy participants (n = 10, mean age ± SD = 21.0 ± 0.9 years) underwent fundus photography with five devices to assess success/failure rates of image acquisition. Participants with optic disc abnormalities (n = 8, mean age ± SD = 26.8 ± 15.9) and macular abnormalities (n = 10, mean age ± SD = 71.6 ± 15.4) underwent imaging with the top three scoring fundus cameras. Images were randomised and subsequently validated by ophthalmologists masked to the diagnoses and devices used. RESULTS: Image acquisition success rates (100%) were achieved in non-mydriatic and mydriatic settings for Zeiss, Remidio and Pictor, compared with lower success rates for iNview and oDocs. Image quality and gradeability were significantly higher for Zeiss, Remidio and Pictor (p < 0.0001) compared to iNview and oDocs. For cup:disc ratio estimates, similar levels of bias were seen for Zeiss (-0.09 ± SD:0.15), Remidio (-0.07 ± SD:0.14) and Pictor (-0.05 ± SD:0.16). Diagnostic sensitivities were highest for Zeiss (84.9%; 95% CI, 78.2-91.5%) followed by Pictor (78.1%; 95% CI, 66.6-89.5%) and Remidio (77.5%; 95% CI, 65.9-89.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Remidio and Pictor achieve comparable results to the Zeiss table-top camera. Both devices achieved similar scores in feasibility, image quality, image gradeability and diagnostic sensitivity. This suggests that these devices potentially offer a more cost-effective alternative in certain clinical scenarios.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Retina , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Retina/diagnostic imaging , Fluorescein Angiography , Photography/methods , Fundus Oculi
3.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 31(5): 2268-2274, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32854520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some ophthalmologists across the United Kingdom (UK) have been redeployed to areas of need across the National Health Service (NHS). This survey was performed to assess aspects of this process including training & education, tasks expected, availability of personal protection equipment (PPE) used and the overall anxiety of ophthalmologists around their redeployment. METHOD: Online anonymous survey around the existing guidance on safe redeployment of secondary care NHS staff and PPE use by NHS England and Public Health England respectively. The survey was open to all ophthalmologists across the UK irrespective of their redeployment status. FINDINGS: 145 surveys were completed and returned during a 2-week period between 17th April 2020 and 1st May 2020, when 52% of ophthalmologists were redeployed. The majority of this group consisted of ophthalmologists in training (79%). 81% of those redeployed were assigned to areas of the hospital where patients with confirmed Coronavirus disease were being treated as inpatients. There was a statistically significant improvement in anxiety level following redeployment which was mainly attributed to the support received by staff within the redeployed area. 71% of the redeployed group were found to have sufficient PPE was provided for the area they worked in. INTERPRETATION: This is the first national survey performed on redeployment of ophthalmologists in the UK. The study showed that ophthalmologists across all grades were able to contribute in most aspects of patient care. Anxiety of redeployment was reduced by prior training and good support in the redeployment area.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ophthalmologists , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 31(6): 2894-2900, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To characterise and compare ocular pathologies presenting to an emergency eye department (EED) during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 against an equivalent period in 2019. METHODS: Electronic patient records of 852 patients in 2020 and 1818 patients in 2019, attending the EED at a tertiary eye centre (University Hospitals of Leicester, UK) were analysed. Data was extracted over a 31-day period during: (study period 1 (SP1)) COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in UK (24th March 2020-23rd April 2020) and (study period 2 (SP2)) the equivalent 2019 period (24th March 2019-23rd April 2019). RESULTS: A 53% reduction in EED attendance was noted during lockdown. The top three pathologies accounting for >30% of the caseload were trauma-related, keratitis and uveitis in SP1 in comparison to conjunctivitis, trauma-related and blepharitis in SP2. The overall number of retinal tears and retinal detachments (RD) were lower in SP1, the proportion of macula-off RD's (84.6%) was significantly (p = 0.0099) higher in SP1 (vs 42.9% in SP2). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic related lockdown has had a significant impact on the range of presenting conditions to the EED. Measures to stop spread of COVID-19 such as awareness of hand hygiene practices, social distancing measures and school closures could have an indirect role in reducing spread of infective conjunctivitis. The higher proportion of macula-off RD and lower number of retinal tears raises possibility of delayed presentation in these cases. Going forward, we anticipate additional pressures on EED and other subspecialty services due to complications and associated morbidity from delayed presentations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , Emergencies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Eur. j. anat ; 24(1): 63-68, ene. 2020. ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-186066

ABSTRACT

During a routine female cadaveric dissection, we found an unusual bilateral pelvic branching pattern of the internal and external iliac arteries. The vaginal and middle rectal arteries had a common origin from the right internal pudendal artery. An aberrant obturator artery arises from both external iliac arteries. A right aberrant obturator artery gives a small branch to the back of the pubic bone. The left inferior epigastric artery arises from the common trunk of the external iliac artery with the aberrant obturator artery. Knowledge of arterial variations helps to reduce the internal hemorrhage during abdominal and pelvic surgeries


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Iliac Artery/anatomy & histology , Cadaver , Dissection/methods , Anatomic Variation , Arteries/anatomy & histology , Psoas Muscles/anatomy & histology , Lymph Nodes/anatomy & histology , Pudendal Nerve/anatomy & histology , Hemorrhage
7.
Eye (Lond) ; 34(3): 593-594, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31320734
9.
J Glaucoma ; 26(9): e217-e221, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28671921

ABSTRACT

We report a case of papilloschisis, where the schisis is noted within the optic nerve tissue with no associated disc pit. This has not been reported in the literature to the best of our knowledge.


Subject(s)
Eye Abnormalities/diagnosis , Optic Disk/abnormalities , Optic Nerve/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Adult , Eye Abnormalities/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL