Measurable residual disease monitoring in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy: Roadmap from an ELN-DAVID expert panel.

With the availability of effective targeted agents, significant changes have occurred in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over the past several years, particularly for those considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. While testing for measurable residual disease (MRD) is now routinely performed in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy to refine prognosis and, possibly, inform treatment decision-making, its value in the context of lower-intensity regimens is unclear. As such regimens have gained in popularity and can be associated with higher response rates, the need to better define the role of MRD assessment and the appropriate time points and assays used for this purpose has increased. This report outlines a roadmap for MRD testing in patients with AML treated with lower-intensity regimens. Experts from the European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-DAVID AML MRD working group reviewed all available data to propose a framework for MRD testing in future trials and clinical practice. A Delphi poll served to optimize consensus. Establishment of uniform standards for MRD assessments in lower-intensity regimens used in treating patients with AML is clinically relevant and important for optimizing testing and, ultimately, improving treatment outcomes of these patients.

Towards cure of CML: why we need to know more about CML stem cells?

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for CML marks one of the major success stories in the recent history of medicine. However, eradication of disease is almost never attained, because, unlike the vast majority of more differentiated cells, leukemic stem cells withstand TKI's, neccessitating life-long treatment. Besides, although a relatively infrequent event under treatment with TKI's, refractory leukemic stem cells may sometimes give rise to disease transformation. In this article, we will review the definitions of CML stem cells, explain how BCR-ABL induces perturbations of critical signal transduction pathways and summarize specific characteristics that cause refractoriness of CML stem cells against TKI's. Furthermore, events that are responsible or related to transformation of the disease into blast crisis will be discussed and new research directions that should lead to successful ways to attack leukemic stem cells are proposed.

Impact of three courses of intensified CHOP prior to high-dose sequential therapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in poor-risk, aggressive non-hodgkin's lymphoma: comparative analysis of Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group Studies 27 and 40.

PURPOSE: Timing, appropriate amount, and composition of treatment before high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with poor-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are still unknown. We conducted two consecutive multicenter phase II trials with up-front, high-dose, sequential chemotherapy and ASCT in poor-risk, aggressive NHL. Both trials had identical inclusion criteria and only differed in amount and duration of induction treatment before ASCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2001, 147 newly diagnosed, poor-risk, aggressive NHL patients, age < or = 65 years with stage III to IV and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) more than 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN), entered the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) -27 and HOVON-40 trials. Treatment in HOVON-27 consisted of two up-front, high-dose induction courses followed by carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan plus ASCT in responding patients. In HOVON-40, the same treatment was preceded by three intensified courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). RESULTS: Patient characteristics in both trials were comparable: 80% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 77% had stage IV disease, and median LDH levels were 3.1x ULN. Complete remission (CR) in both trials was 45% to 51%. Before ASCT, CR was 14% in HOVON-27 versus 28% in HOVON-40 (P = .03). Treatment failure was similar (27%). Four-year survival estimates in HOVON-27 compared with HOVON-40 were overall survival, 21% v 50% (P = .007); event-free survival, 15% v 49% (P = .0001); and disease-free survival, 34% v 74% (P = .008). This different outcome favoring HOVON-40 remained highly significant when correcting for competing risk factors in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In patients with poor-risk, aggressive NHL, addition of intensified CHOP before up-front, high-dose, sequential therapy and ASCT significantly improved the duration of response and survival.