Use of donors who have suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation in lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Shortage of donors is one of the major limitations in lung transplantation (LuTX) and an aggressive expansion of criteria for donor selection has been proposed. This study evaluates the outcome of recipients of pulmonary grafts coming from resuscitated donors when compared with recipients of non-resuscitated donors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the donor and recipient charts of all double LuTX performed at our institution between 2000 and 2008 with regard to the performance of donor-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). RESULTS: Out of 186 eligible transplants, 22 patients (11.8%) received lungs from donors who have suffered cardiac arrest (CA) and subsequent CPR. Mean duration of CPR was 15.2 ± 11.3 min. Terminal laboratory profiles of CPR donors and non-CPR donors were similar as were ventilation time and paO(2)/FiO(2) ratio before organ harvesting or chest X-ray. CPR-donor status did not affect the following indices of graft function: length of postoperative ventilation, paO(2)/FiO(2) ratio up to 48 h and lung function up to 60 months. Length of intensive care and hospital stay, need for inotropic support and 30-day mortality were not significantly different for the transplantation of CPR or no-CPR donor lungs. One- and 3-year survival rates were comparable as well with 84.4% and 66.3% for CPR donors versus 88.5% and 69.8% no-CPR donors. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that transplantation of lungs from resuscitated donors may not affect outcome after LuTX. Therefore, donor history of CA should not automatically preclude LuTX.

Society of Thoracic Surgeons score is superior to the EuroSCORE determining mortality in high risk patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Major scores for the evaluation of procedural risk in cardiac surgery are the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation score (EuroSCORE), the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score, and the Parsonnet score. The aim of our study was to analyze the predictive value of these scores in "high risk" patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-two patients underwent isolated AVR from January 1999 through June 2007. Emergency and redo operations were included; acute endocarditis was excluded. Evaluation was performed by logistic regression analysis. Data collection was prospective. RESULTS: The mean logistic EuroSCORE of all patients was 8.5 +/- 7.9%, the mean STS score was 4.4 +/- 3.9%, and the mean logistic Parsonnet score was 9.8 +/- 8.5%. In-hospital mortality was 2.5% (n = 16). Freedom from all-cause death was 93.4% at 1 year, 90.2% at 2 years, and 75.8% at 5 years, respectively. A total of 182 patients had a logistic EuroSCORE greater than 10. For the group of patients with a EuroSCORE between 10% and 20% (n = 130) the mean EuroSCORE was 13.9 +/- 2.8% and the STS score was 6.5 +/- 3.8%. Observed mortality was 4.6% in this group. For the 52 patients with a logistic EuroSCORE of at least 20 (mean 28.5 +/- 10.3%, STS score 10.1 +/- 7.3%) the observed mortality was 3.9% (n = 2). By stepwise logistic regression, none of the EuroSCORE variables could be identified as an independent predictor in the "high- risk" group. CONCLUSIONS: The logistic EuroSCORE was primarily created to allow patient grouping for the total spectrum of cardiac surgery. In patients undergoing isolated AVR, the EuroSCORE highly overestimates mortality, whereas the STS score seems to be actually more suitable in assessing perioperative mortality for these patients.

High defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable defibrillator: how effective is the subcutaneous finger lead?

OBJECTIVE: Even in the era of high output implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) devices, a certain proportion of patients cannot be successfully defibrillated with 10 J safety margin. In practice, either the use of a single- or double-coil lead does not guarantee successful termination of induced ventricular fibrillation. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness of the subcutaneous finger lead placed at the subcutaneous tissue dorsal to the left ventricle in terms of defibrillation threshold (DFT) lowering. METHODS: Two thousand, eight hundred and three consecutive, unselected patients underwent first-time ICD implantation or ICD device exchange from 6/1999 through 3/2007. The mean age of the patients was 65.4 years. A total of 79.3% of the patients were male. The only implanted subcutaneous lead was the 6996 model by Medtronic Inc. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven patients (6.3%) received a subcutaneous finger lead implantation. According to the current institutional DFT testing protocol, any failure of the two standard DFT tests in first-time ICD implantation or a failure at the single test in ICD exchange operations was the trigger for subcutaneous finger lead implantation. The proportion of subcutaneous finger lead implantations increased parallel to a markedly larger amount of implantations. Since high output devices became standard, the implantation number of subcutaneous finger leads decreases. The mean of unsuccessful DFTs prior to subcutaneous finger lead implantation was 27.2+/-5.3 J. After subcutaneous finger lead implantation, the mean successful DFT was 17.9+/-3.3 J. No complication due to subcutaneous finger lead implantation occurred. CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous finger lead is a quick, safe and effective method for DFT lowering.

Massive alterations of the left internal thoracic artery late after repair for aortic coarctation.

Adhesions or unattended injury are known but are seldom reasons to prevent withdrawing the use of the left internal thoracic artery during coronary artery bypass grafting. The patient in this case report was a 68-year-old man, who had undergone repair for aortic coarctation 34 years prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. After left internal thoracic artery harvesting, a no-flow situation of the graft was present. Transection of the graft revealed massive atherosclerotic alterations. To avoid unnecessary left internal thoracic artery harvesting, preoperative imaging in terms of a left internal thoracic artery angiography during coronary angiography is mandatory. The fact of finding massive alterations decades after pressure reduction indicates that relief from shear stress is not necessarily combined with remodeling of vascular alterations.

Overestimation of aortic valve replacement risk by EuroSCORE: implications for percutaneous valve replacement.

AIMS: The EuroSCORE has been proposed to identify patients at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and estimate for them the risk-benefit of percutaneous valve replacement. The aim of our study was to investigate the validity of this proposal. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1994 to March 2006, 1545 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis underwent isolated surgical AVR at the Department of Cardiac Surgery of Heidelberg. Both additive and logistic EuroSCOREs were calculated for each patient and summed for expected 30-day mortality. Expected and observed mortalities were compared, particularly with respect to 'high-risk' status and era of operation. Overall, 30-day mortality was low (34/1545, 2.2%) and substantially overestimated by both additive (6.1%) and logistic (9.3%) EuroSCOREs. Although both EuroSCOREs stratified patients monotonically with respect to mortality risk, high-risk patients had a 3.6% mortality (29/833), whereas additive and logistic EuroSCOREs predicted 8.3 and 14.8%. Indeed, none of the 71 patients with a EuroSCORE of 11-20 (extremely high risk) died. The more recent the era of operation, the more pronounced was the discrepancy between expected and observed mortalities. CONCLUSION: Although the EuroSCORE still successfully stratifies patients undergoing surgical AVR relative to 30-day mortality, it has become increasingly uncalibrated with absolute risk, resulting in overestimation of 30-day mortality. Inaccurately predicted mortality, especially in 'high-risk' patients, renders it unsuitable for assessing risk reduction of percutaneous valve replacement.

Cardiac surgery in patients on dialysis: decreased 30-day mortality, unchanged overall survival.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiac surgery in dialysis-dependent patients is high, but little is known about the determinants of survival. We initiated a retrospective multicenter study to overcome this limitation. METHODS: Nine centers provided data on 522 patients (70% male, aged 61 +/- 11 years) who had chronic dialysis-dependent renal failure. A 14-year period was covered. Most patients had coronary artery bypass grafting, either with (n = 103) or without (n = 326) valve surgery. Multivariable analysis of survival was explored using Cox models. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus increased significantly (from 17%, 1989 to 1993, to 32%, 2000 to 2003; p = 0.021) and was independently associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 3.30, p = 0.001) The mean 30-day mortality was 12% (n = 60), but declined significantly during the study period (from 28%, 1989 to 1993, to 7%, 2000 to 2003; p = 0.003). The 5-year survival probability was 42% (95% confidence interval: 36% to 47%). Patients who had renal transplantation during follow-up (n = 17) had the best survival probability (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.14, p = 0.007). Sinus rhythm (HR = 0.48, p < 0.001) and use of internal thoracic artery grafts (HR = 0.67, p = 0.006) proved beneficial for long-term survival. Predictors of death during long-term follow-up were emergency surgery (HR = 2.25, p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.46, p = 0.020), number of allogenic transfusions (HR = 1.03/unit, p = 0.015), and age (HR = 1.04/year, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In dialysis-dependent patients, cardiac surgery has become significantly safer in recent years, but the overall prognosis of the patients remains poor. The observed improvements in the perioperative survival do not necessarily translate into an improved long-term prognosis. Diabetes mellitus is an important independent risk factor for perioperative mortality and death during follow-up.

Minimal touch surgical implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantations.

A growing number of patients with contraindication for transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation or need for system upgrade of a pre-existent pacemaker system is to be observed. Therefore, unconventional system constellation may be necessary to provide patient safety by using a minimal invasive access avoiding sternotomy. Two similar cases are presented to demonstrate configuration solutions which can be easily individually modified. Simple pacemaker and ICD implantation is nowadays mostly performed by cardiologists and/or general surgeons. As soon as partial or total thoracotomy becomes necessary, the patient will be referred to a department of cardiac surgery. Hence, in the very near future, cardiac surgeons will face a large number of redo procedures for pacemaker- and ICD systems including the necessity for mixed transvenous and epicardial solutions. To avoid significant morbidity deriving from sternotomy and pericardiotomy, concepts for as less invasive as possible solutions are presented.

Ventricular oversensing: a study of 101 patients implanted with dual chamber defibrillators and two different lead systems.

UNLABELLED: Modern dual chamber ICD systems are able to overcome various sensing problems. However, improvement of their performance is still required. The aim of this study was to assess the sensing function in 101 consecutive patients (84 men, 17 women; mean age 63 +/- 12 years; mean follow-up 24 +/- 4 months) implanted with dual chamber defibrillators and integrated (IB) or dedicated bipolar (DB) lead systems. Follow-up data were analyzed for the presence of ventricular oversensing. Oversensing occurred in 25 (25%) patients, significantly more frequent in patients implanted with IB compared to DB lead systems (21/52 vs 4/49, P = 0.0002). Patients with cardiomyopathies (CMs) were more prone to sensing malfunctions than patients with no CM (12/30 vs 13/71, P = 0.04). T wave oversensing (n = 14), respirophasic ventricular oversensing (n = 4), and P wave oversensing (n = 6) were the most common pitfalls of ventricular sensing. P wave oversensing was unique to the IB lead system. CT scans performed in these patients disclosed the position of the RV coil to be proximal to the tricuspid area. Four patients received inappropriate ICD shocks due to oversensing. In all but two patients who received lead revision, oversensing was resolved by noninvasive means. IN CONCLUSION: (1) ventricular oversensing is a common problem occurring in up to 25% of patients with dual chamber ICDs; (2) P wave oversensing is a ventricular sensing problem affecting function of 11% of dual chamber devices with IB lead systems; (3) IB leads are significantly more susceptible to T wave and P wave oversensing than DB leads; and (4) patients with cardiomyopathies are more prone to oversensing than patients with other heart diseases.