Unapproved prescription cough, cold, and allergy drug products: recent US Food and Drug Administration regulatory action on unapproved cough, cold, and allergy medications.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approval and over-the-counter drug monograph processes play an essential role in ensuring that all drugs are both safe and effective for their intended uses. Manufacturers of drugs that lack required approval have not provided the FDA with evidence demonstrating that their products are safe and effective. Some of these prescription drugs have been marketed for many years and have remained on the market despite changes to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which requires approval for safety and efficacy purposes. Many health-care providers may be unaware that unapproved drugs exist because the product labels of these drugs do not disclose that they lack FDA approval. The FDA recently took action against unapproved prescription oral cough, cold, and allergy drug products because of concerns about the potential risks of these products, particularly some extended-release formulations that have not been reviewed for quality. There is a potential for medication errors because product names and labeling have not been reviewed for potential confusion, with some products inappropriately labeled for use in children aged ≤ 2 years. FDA-approved prescription drugs or drugs appropriately marketed as over the counter remain available for treatment of cough, cold, and allergy symptoms. Such products are of known efficacy, safety, identity, quality, and purity. Removing unapproved drugs from the marketplace and encouraging manufacturers of unapproved products to seek FDA review and approval is a top priority for the FDA. Since the initiation of the Unapproved Drugs Initiative in 2006, the FDA has removed ~1,500 unapproved products from the market and has worked with firms to bring other unapproved drugs into the approval process. The FDA remains committed to its mission of ensuring that safe and effective drugs are available to American consumers.

2001 anthrax crisis in Washington, D.C.: clinic for persons exposed to contaminated mail.

An anthrax prophylaxis clinic is described. In October 2001, four workers from the U.S. Postal Service's Brentwood facility in Washington, D.C., were hospitalized with inhalational anthrax; many others may have been exposed to anthrax spores. U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) teams were deployed to establish an anthrax prophylaxis clinic that would provide education and medication to workers and people who visited the mail facility. The temporary clinic was set up at D.C. General Hospital and was staffed primarily by health care professionals from USPHS. The protocol at the clinic involved three major phases. Phase 1 consisted of gathering information from the patient and distributing educational materials. Phase 2 involved presentations by a physician and a pharmacist concerning anthrax, followed by a question-and-answer session. In phase 3, a pharmacist selected the most appropriate prophylactic agent, dispensed the medication, counseled the patient, and referred patients with flu-like symptoms or skin lesions to a physician. Two floor plans were used to maximize the number of patients seen per hour without jeopardizing patient care. The clinic operated 14 hours a day for 14 days. The 136-member health care team included 52 pharmacists, and medication was dispensed to more than 18,000 patients. The clinic may serve as a model for pharmacists and other professionals in designing and implementing disaster plans. A multidisciplinary team established and operated a clinic to treat persons who may have been exposed to anthrax through contaminated mail.

2001 anthrax crisis in Washington, D.C.: pharmacists' role in screening patients and selecting prophylaxis.

Pharmacists' development and use of a worksheet facilitating their rapid selection of patient-appropriate prophylactic antimicrobials in an anthrax clinic is described. A clinic housed at D.C. General Hospital, in Washington, D.C., treated most of the people--many of them postal workers--who may have been exposed to anthrax in that city during the 2001 anthrax crisis. A form was needed to assist pharmacists in the rapid selection of prophylactic antimicrobials and in patient education and counseling. A team of pharmacists collaborated on the development of a form tailored to the clinical and logistical needs of the operation. The questions on the form were based largely on the two antianthrax agents most likely to be used, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline, and were designed to identify the circumstances that would most frequently require a medication change or a modification of patient education. Yes-or-no check boxes allowed pertinent data to be captured most efficiently. A positive response to any question triggered a personal interview and assessment by a pharmacist. A treatment algorithm was also developed to ensure consistent pharmacist selection of agents in the face of potentially changing policies and staff. The worksheet questions sought to establish treatment objectives, document allergies and concomitant therapies, and identify patients who were pregnant or lactating. Pharmacists developed a patient-screening worksheet that helped determine their choice of treatment for people who may have been exposed to anthrax in Washington, D.C., during the 2001 anthrax crisis.