Implementation Science and Practice-Oriented Research: Convergence and Complementarity.

Implementation science is the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices in routine care, with the goal of improving the quality and effectiveness of health services (Bauer et al., 2015). In addition to this common goal, practice-oriented psychotherapy research (and researchers) and implementation science (and scientists) share a common focus on the people and the places where treatment happens. Thus, there exists strong potential for combining these two approaches. In this article, we provide a primer on implementation science for psychotherapy researchers and highlight important areas and examples of convergence and complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research. Specifically, we (a) define and describe the core features of implementation science; (b) discuss similarities and areas of complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research; (c) discuss a case example that exemplifies the integration of implementation science and practice-oriented research; and (d) propose directions for future research and collaborations that leverage both implementation science and practice-oriented research.

A Multimethod Study of Mental Health Care Patients' Attitudes Toward Clinician-Level Performance Information.

OBJECTIVE: Research demonstrates variability in mental health clinicians' overall and domain-specific outcomes for their patients. Despite calls to increase patient access to provider performance information, little is known about patients' attitudes toward and valuing of this information. This study explored patient attitudes, preferences, and values regarding the use of clinician outcome track records in provider selection and treatment decision making. METHODS: Community mental health patients (N=403) completed a multicomponent survey, and a subset of patients (N=15) completed a follow-up semistructured interview. Interview data were analyzed with consensual qualitative methods. RESULTS: Overall, participants endorsed valuing access to clinician outcome track record information and endorsed the belief that using such information would enhance the referral process and promote better mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Harnessing measurement-based information on clinicians' effectiveness to make more personalized treatment decisions could promote better treatment engagement, retention, and outcomes.

Feasibility and acceptability of a novel tool for the study of interpersonal processes in psychotherapy.

Psychotherapy process research methods often require extensive time and resources. Technology innovations, such as wearable sensors, have the potential to increase the efficiency of process data collection and processing. One such tool is the Sociometric Badge (SB), which is a portable, palm-sized device that can simultaneously record raw audio and data on social signals (e.g., speech patterns, body movement) in real-time and in varied contexts. In addition to describing the nature and implications of wearable sensing devices for psychotherapy research, this article reports results from a pilot study that examined the feasibility and acceptance of these assessment devices in comparison with traditional audio recording equipment. Undergraduate students (N = 306; Mage = 19.16 years, SD = 1.44; 50.3% female) were randomly placed into 153 dyads to mimic a psychotherapy dyad. Each dyad was randomly assigned to either a SB condition (n = 75 dyads) or a standard recording device condition (n = 78 dyads), and engaged in a conversation task. Participants completed self-report items assessing perceived relationship quality and experience with the respective recording device. Between-condition tests showed that perceived relationship quality did not differ between conditions. Participants in the audio recorder (vs. SB) condition reported more awareness of the device in the room. These findings reveal comparable acceptability and feasibility of SBs to traditional audio recorders in a simulated dyad, suggesting that wearable sensing devices may be suitable for research and practice in routine psychotherapy contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

A preliminary naturalistic clinical case series study of the feasibility and impact of interoceptive exposure for eating disorders.

Recent literature suggests that individuals with eating disorders demonstrate altered interoceptive processing, which may relate to the maintenance of symptoms and thus represent a salient treatment target. Adopting treatment techniques effective for other conditions characterized by disturbed interoceptive processes (e.g., anxiety disorders) could aid in improving the outcomes of psychological interventions for eating disorders. The current investigation was a naturalistic case series (N = 4) that examined adjunctive interoceptive exposure (IE) for eating disorders, with an emphasis on evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of this intervention on anxiety sensitivity, interoceptive deficits, and eating disorder symptoms. Results suggested that all individuals who received 4 consecutive sessions of traditional and eating-disorder-specific IE exercises demonstrated decreases in interoceptive deficits and subjective distress. Results for anxiety sensitivity and eating disorder symptoms were encouraging yet more mixed. Findings also generally suggested that the intervention was feasible and acceptable, yet between-session practice compliance varied considerably among participants. Overall, we describe how IE may be used to target interoceptive deficits in eating disorders and provide preliminary evidence of how this may be accomplished within naturalistic intensive outpatient settings.

Practice-research integration in the residential treatment of patients with severe eating and comorbid disorders.

Residential treatment involves a number of treatment components and modalities, and treatment staff come from diverse training backgrounds. These complexities present unique challenges for the implementation of standardized programming, training, and routine assessment to support practice and research aims. Implementation science highlights the critical role of clinician attitudes in successful adoption and sustainability. This article describes an ongoing real-world quality improvement effort to implement transdiagnostic evidence-based interventions for primary eating disorders, as well as routine data collection, in a residential eating disorder treatment center. We specifically focus on clinicians' subjective experience of, and attitudes toward, the implementation of new treatment strategies and data collection. Participating clinicians completed a semistructured interview based on constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, an organizing framework for implementation practice and research. Interviews were analyzed using consensual qualitative research. Results indicate that clinicians had positive overall implementation experiences, with available resources, leadership engagement, patient needs, relative advantage, and self-efficacy emerging as constructs that had the greatest impact on implementation. Clinicians also offered specific critiques and suggestions about the intervention and the implementation process. These results can inform internal sustainability efforts and can be integrated into future evidence-based intervention implementation and data collection efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Mental health care consumers' relative valuing of clinician performance information.

BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates significant variability in mental health clinicians' overall and domain-specific effectiveness with their patients. Despite calls to increase patient access to performance information, little is known about patients' relative valuing of this information in the context of other treatment factors. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to obtain an understanding of patients' relative valuing of provider performance track records and other therapist and treatment characteristics for their mental health care decision making. METHOD: Participants were 403 (Mage = 41.20; 66.5% female) community mental health patients who completed a multicomponent survey that included an adapted delayed-discounting paradigm to examine the relative valuing. Multiple descriptive, quantitative indices of relative valuing were calculated, as well as an exploratory latent profile analysis to ascertain the presence of homogenous relative-valuing subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, participants valued provider track record information. They also evidenced relatively higher preference values for working with therapists who had specific efficacy in treating their primary problem domain, charged less, and with whom there is a high likelihood of establishing a good alliance. Two latent profiles were identified: one representing higher valuing of provider performance and another consistently representing less emphasis. Participants with higher track-record valuing were younger, believed that therapists are not interchangeable, and endorsed trust in the collection and use of performance information. CONCLUSION: Harnessing clinician information to make more personalized and informed treatment decisions could potentially promote better treatment engagement, retention, and outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record

Response of School Districts to the New York State Concussion Awareness and Management Act: Review of Policies and Procedures.

BACKGROUND: By 2014, all states implemented concussion laws that schools must translate into daily practice; yet, limited knowledge exists regarding implementation of these laws. We examined the extent to which concussion management policies and procedure (P&P) documents of New York State school districts comply with the State's Concussion Awareness and Management Act (the Act). We also aimed to identify barriers to compliance. METHODS: Forty-seven school districts provided P&P documents. We examined compliance with the Act and the relationship between compliance and each district's demographics. RESULTS: Compliance varied across school districts, with higher overall compliance in large city school districts compared to county districts. However, there was low compliance for several critical items. We found no statistically significant relationship between compliance and demographics. CONCLUSIONS: School districts need to increase compliance with concussion legislation to ensure the adequate implementation necessary for the law to impact health and educational outcomes. The results provide important information to individuals charged with the responsibility of implementation and ultimately reducing the negative outcomes associated with brain injuries in schools.

Interpersonal pathoplasticity and trajectories of change in routine adolescent and young adult residential substance abuse treatment.

BACKGROUND: Partnerships between mental health care stakeholders provide a context for generalizable clinical research with implications for quality improvement. In the context of a partnership between an adolescent residential substance abuse disorder (SUD) treatment center and clinical researchers, stakeholders identified knowledge gaps (internal and the field broadly) with regard to patient interpersonal factors that influence working alliance and acute SUD residential treatment outcome trajectories. OBJECTIVE: To (a) examine interpersonal pathoplasticity and identify interpersonal subtypes in a naturalistic sample of adolescent and young-adult patients presenting for routine residential SUD treatment and (b) investigate the association between identified interpersonal subtypes and working alliance and acute treatment outcome trajectories. METHOD: N = 100 patients (Mage = 17.39 years, 68% male, 84% White) completed self-reports of symptom and functioning outcomes, interpersonal problems, and the working alliance on multiple occasions between admission and discharge. Multiple methods were used to identify interpersonal subtypes and test pathoplasticity. Interpersonal subtype was entered as a predictor in respective multilevel models of working alliance and symptom outcome. RESULTS: Interpersonal subtypes of vindictive and exploitable patients demonstrated pathoplasticity. Subtype did not predict working alliance trajectories; however, a significant interaction between interpersonal subtype and a quadratic effect for time demonstrated that exploitable patients with longer than average treatment lengths experienced attenuated symptom change over the course of treatment whereas vindictive patients appeared to demonstrate steady progress. CONCLUSIONS: Interpersonal assessments should be integrated into residential SUD treatment to identify patients with an exploitable interpersonal style who might require additional attention or alternative interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record

The Expanding Relevance of Routinely Collected Outcome Data for Mental Health Care Decision Making.

Evidence shows that routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and feedback using standardized measurement tools enhances the outcomes of individual patients. When outcome data from a large number of patients and clinicians are collected, patterns can be tracked and comparisons can be made at multiple levels. Variability in skills and outcomes among clinicians and service settings has been documented, and the relevance of ROM for decision making is rapidly expanding alongside the transforming health care landscape. In this article, we highlight several developing core implications of ROM for mental health care, and frame points of future work and discussion.