ABSTRACT
The Japan Diabetes Society's Committee to Promote Female Diabetologists conducted a questionnaire survey from May to June 2017 to investigate the work style and living situation of diabetologists. The survey targeted 5298 Board Certified Diabetologists (diabetologists), with answers obtained from 1566 diabetologists (male, n = 1003: females, n = 563). Ninety-four percent of the males and 72% of the females worked full time. Twenty-one percent of the male subjects and 7% of the female subjects were heads of clinical departments, and 23% of the male subjects and 13% of the female subjects were diabetes training instructors, showing that there were fewer women than men in both roles. Regarding the allocation of time per day, men spent 10.7 h working, while women spent 8.5 h working. Both men and women slept 6.3 h. Men spent 1.0 h on housework, while women spent 3.3 h on housework. Men spent 0.7 h on childcare and nursing care, while women, spent 2.8 h. Among diabetologists in the childrearing generation, men spent 1.4 h providing childcare and nursing care, while women spent 4.9 h, showing that women spent significantly more time on these tasks than men. To encourage female diabetologists to work more actively, to reduce overworking on the part of male diabetologists, and to enhance the careers of both men and women as diabetologists, we conclude it necessary to improve the workplace environment and for the Japan Diabetes Society to offer support.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers are commonly used to treat hypertension, and are known to generally act on the L-type calcium channel. Recent studies have shown, however, that some calcium channel blockers also block other calcium channel subtypes, including N- and T-type channels. Cilnidipine (CAS 132203-70-4) is an L- and N-type calcium channel blocker, and benidipine hydrochloride (benidipine, CAS 91599-74-5) is known to inhibit the T-type as well as L- and N-type calcium channels. In this study, effects of switching from cilnidipine to benidipine on blood pressure (BP) lowering and renal functions were investigated in order to clarify the physiological properties of the T-type calcium channel. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty hypertensive patients with diabetes and poor BP control despite receiving cilnidipine were selected, and the changes in BP and urine protein (UP) scores were investigated retrospectively after switching from cilnidipine to benidipine for more than 3 months. BP (systolic/diastolic) significantly decreased from 155.8 +/- 13.7 mmHg/76.5 +/- 13.3 mmHg to 145.9 +/- 17.0 mmHg/71.4 +/- 13.7 mmHg after benidipine treatment, and this effect was stably maintained for one year. UP also significantly decreased from 1.29 to 0.67 in the mean score. The decrease in UP may be explained by a mechanism other than BP lowering effect. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that benidipine has a more potent antihypertensive effect than cilnidipine and also a renoprotective effect, indicating the high usefulness of benidipine in hypertensive patients with diabetes. T-type calcium channel blockade was suggested to be possibly involved in the enoprotective effect of benidipine.
