Both CD133(+) cells and monocytes provide significant improvement for hindlimb ischemia, although they do not transdifferentiate into endothelial cells.

To address a number of questions regarding the experimental use of bone marrow (BM) stem cells in hindlimb ischemia, including which is the best cell type (e.g., purified hematopoietic stem cell or monocytes), the best route of delivery [intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV)], and the mechanism of action (transdifferentiation or paracrine effects), we have compared the neovascularization capacities of CD133(+) stem cells and monocytes (CD11b(+)) from the BM of Tie2-GFP mice either via IV or IM in a murine severe hindlimb ischemia model. To test the effect of cytokine administration, an extra group received BM conditioned medium. Peripheral blood flow as well as capillary density and GPF-positivity detection in ischemic muscles was evaluated 7, 14, and 21 days postinjection. In addition, CD133(+) and CD11b(+) cells from transgenic animals were cultured in vitro with angiogenic media for 7, 14, and 21 days to assess GFP expression. In all four cell-treated groups, blood flow and capillary density significantly recovered compared with the mice that received no cells or conditioned medium. There were no differences with respect to cell types or administration routes, with the exception of a faster flow recovery in the CD133(+)-treated cell group. We did not find GFP(+) cells in the ischemic muscles and there was no GFP expression after in vitro proangiogenic culture. Our study shows that both purified CD133(+) stem cells and myeloid mononuclear cells, either IM or IV administered, have similar neoangiogenic ability. Nevertheless, transdifferentiation into endothelial cells is not the mechanism responsible for their beneficial effect.

Prospective comparative analysis of the angiogenic capacity of monocytes and CD133+ cells in a murine model of hind limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare prospectively the vasculogenic capacity of two cell sources, monocytes and CD133+ cells. METHODS: Cells were obtained from healthy donors by adherence or magnetic selection. Animals studies were performed in a model of hind limb ischemia and different groups were established according to type and number of cells infused. Revascularization was measured by sequential blood flow analysis using a laser Doppler device and by assessing capillary density in the ischemic muscles. In order to locate the infused cells, immunofluorescence and immunocytochemistry techniques were performed and analyzed by light and confocal microscopy. RESULTS: During the study period there was a significant improvement in both limb perfusion and capillary density in mice treated with either human monocytes or CD133+ cells (P<0.05) compared with non-treated mice. No cells were detected as incorporated into the vessels when 1 x 10(5) cells were used but with higher doses (1 x 10(6)) a few human cells were observed integrated into the vessels in both groups of treated mice. Supernatants of both cell types showed vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor- AB (PDGF-AB) expression. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with human monocytes or CD133+ cells improves blood perfusion and capillary density in a murine model and both cell types seem to stimulate vasculogenesis in a fairly similar way.