ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Community-based prevalence studies are known to be more accurate than hospital-based records. However, such community-based prevalence studies are uncommon in low- and middle-income countries including Nigeria. Allocation of resources and prioritization of health care needs by policy makers require data from such community-based studies to be meaningful and sustainable. This study aims to assess the prevalence of common surgical conditions amongst adults in Nigeria. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional community-based study to determine the prevalence of congenital and acquired surgical conditions in adults in a mixed rural-urban area of Lagos was conducted. The study population comprised resident members in the Ikorodu Local Government Area (LGA) of Lagos State. Data was collected using a modified version of the interviewer-administered questionnaire, the Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS) survey tool. Data was analysed using the REDCap analytic tool. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-six households were surveyed with a yield of 1,992 adults. There were 95 adults who complained of surgical conditions giving a prevalence rate of 5%. Vast majority of reported conditions were acquired deformities (n=94) while only 1 congenital deformity was reported. Others included breast lumps, anterior neck swelling, and groin swellings. CONCLUSION: The most common surgical complaints in our setting among adults were acquired conditions of the extremities and open wounds/sores. With an estimated population of 90 million adults and approximately 1,200 orthopaedic and general surgeons respectively, the surgeon-to-affected population ratio is 1:10,000. There is a large gap to be filled in terms of surgical manpower development.
INTRODUCTION: Les études de prévalence communautaires sont connues pour être plus précises que les dossiers hospitaliers. Cependant, de telles études de prévalence communautaires sont rares dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire, y compris le Nigeria. L'allocation des ressources et la priorisation des besoins de santé par les décideurs nécessitent des données issues de telles études communautaires pour être significatives et durables. Cette étude vise à évaluer la prévalence des affections chirurgicales courantes chez les adultes au Nigeria. MÉTHODES: Une étude descriptive transversale basée sur la communauté pour déterminer la prévalence des conditions chirurgicales congénitales et acquises chez les adultes dans une zone rurale-urbaine mixte de Lagos a été menée. La population étudiée comprenait des membres résidents de la zone de gouvernement local (LGA) d'Ikorodu, dans l'État de Lagos. Les données ont été collectées à l'aide d'une version modifiée du questionnaire administré par un enquêteur, l'outil d'enquête Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need (SOSAS). Les données ont été analysées à l'aide de l'outil analytique REDCap. RÉSULTATS: Huit cent cinquante-six ménages ont été enquêtés, ce qui a donné 1 992 adultes. Quatre-vingt-quinze adultes se sont plaints de conditions chirurgicales, donnant un taux de prévalence de 5 %. La grande majorité des conditions rapportées étaient des déformations acquises (n=94) tandis qu'une seule déformation congénitale a été signalée. Les autres incluaient des nodules mammaires, des gonflements antérieurs du cou et des gonflements inguinaux. CONCLUSION: Les plaintes chirurgicales les plus courantes dans notre cadre parmi les adultes étaient des conditions acquises des extrémités et des plaies ouvertes/ulcères. Avec une population estimée à 90 millions d'adultes et environ 1 200 chirurgiens orthopédiques et généralistes respectivement, le ratio chirurgien-population affectée est de 1:10,000. Il y a un grand écart à combler en termes de développement de la main-d'Åuvre chirurgicale. MOTS CLÉS: Prévalence, Charge de morbidité, Chirurgie, Plaies.
Subject(s)
Rural Population , Urban Population , Humans , Nigeria/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Female , Male , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand , Aged , Needs AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is the ninth leading cause of death worldwide. World Tuberculosis Day is held every year to increase global awareness of TB.OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of World Tuberculosis Day using Internet-based data.METHODS: Google Trends™ data were used to quantify digital searches for the term 'tuberculosis' worldwide and in the seven countries with the highest TB incidence. We estimated the mean difference in relative search volume (RSV) between World Tuberculosis Day and control periods. This was done separately for each year (2004-2017) and for the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2017. The mean differences in RSVs with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. P values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.RESULTS: Analyses of single years revealed the mean difference in RSV for worldwide searches on average was 12.5 (95%CI 4.6-20.2). Between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2017, it was 10.4 (95%CI 6.0-15.0). In high-incidence countries, results ranged from -0.9 (95%CI -5.0 to 6.0) for Nigeria to 13.3 (95%CI 5.0-25.0) for South Africa.CONCLUSION: International campaigns such as the World Tuberculosis Day raise global awareness of TB. More actions are needed to increase TB awareness in high-incidence countries.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/trends , Internet , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Developing Countries , Humans , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Technological advances have led to the generation of large amounts of data, both in surgical research and practice. Despite this, it is unclear how much originates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and what barriers exist to the use of such data in improving surgical care. The aim of this review was to capture the extent and impact of programmes that use large volumes of patient data on surgical care in LMICs. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar was performed in August 2018. Prospective studies collecting large volumes of patient-level data within LMIC settings were included and evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies were included from 71 LMICs, involving 708 032 patients. The number of patients in included studies varied widely (from 335 to 428 346), with 25 reporting data on 3000 or more LMIC patients. Patient inclusion in large-data studies in LMICs has increased dramatically since 2015. Studies predominantly involved Brazil, China, India and Thailand, with low patient numbers from Africa and Latin America. Outcomes after surgery were commonly the focus (33 studies); very few large studies looked at access to surgical care or patient expenditure. The use of large data sets specifically to improve surgical outcomes in LMICs is currently limited. CONCLUSION: Large volumes of data are becoming more common and provide a strong foundation for continuing investigation. Future studies should address questions more specific to surgery.