Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 309(23): 2465-72, 2013 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780459

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Injection of contaminated methylprednisolone has resulted in an unprecedented nationwide outbreak of Exserohilum rostratum fungal infections, manifested initially as meningitis and/or basilar stroke. Insidious onset of spinal or paraspinal infection at the injection site has been increasingly reported and is occurring months after receipt of injection with the contaminated drug. The clinical findings are often subtle and similar to those that led the patient to undergo the methylprednisolone injection. OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients who had not presented for medical care but who had received contaminated methylprednisolone developed spinal or paraspinal infection at the injection site using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: There were 172 patients who had received an injection of contaminated methylprednisolone from a highly contaminated lot (No. 06292012@26) at a pain facility but had not presented for medical care related to adverse effects after the injection. Screening MRI was performed between November 9, 2012, and April 30, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number of persons identified with previously undiagnosed spinal or paraspinal infection. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients screened, MRI was abnormal in 36 (21%), showing epidural or paraspinal abscess or phlegmon, arachnoiditis, spinal osteomyelitis or diskitis, or moderate to severe epidural, paraspinal, or intradural enhancement. Of the 115 patients asked about new or worsening back or neck pain, lower extremity weakness, or radiculopathy symptoms, 35 (30%) had at least 1 symptom. Thirty-five of the 36 patients with abnormal MRIs met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) case definition for probable (17 patients) or confirmed (18 patients) fungal spinal or paraspinal infection. All 35 patients were treated with antifungal agents (voriconazole, with or without liposomal amphotericin B), and 24 required surgical debridement. At the time of surgery, 17 of 24 patients (71%), including 5 patients who denied having symptoms, had laboratory evidence of fungal infection. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients who underwent screening MRI to look for infection at the site of injection of contaminated methylprednisolone, 21% had an abnormal MRI, and all but one met CDC criteria for probable or confirmed fungal spinal or paraspinal infection. Screening MRI led to identification of patients who had minimal or no symptoms of spinal or paraspinal infection and allowed early initiation of medical and surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Drug Contamination , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Methylprednisolone/adverse effects , Soft Tissue Infections/diagnosis , Spinal Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Back Pain/drug therapy , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Meningitis/epidemiology , Meningitis/etiology , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Soft Tissue Infections/etiology , Spinal Diseases/etiology , Young Adult
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(2): 145-8, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22579261

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data from community antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are limited. We describe clinical and economic outcomes from the first year of our hospital's ASP. METHODS: The ASP team comprised 2 infectious disease physicians and 3 intensive care unit pharmacists. The team prospectively audited the new starts and weekly use of 8 target antimicrobials: aztreonam, caspofungin, daptomycin, ertapenem, linezolid, meropenem, tigecycline, and voriconazole. Using administrative data, outcomes from the first year of the program, including death within 30 days of hospitalization, readmission within 30 days of discharge, and development of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), were compared with outcomes from a similar period before institution of the program. RESULTS: A total of 510 antimicrobial orders were reviewed, of which 323 (63%) were appropriate, 94 (18%) prompted deescalation, 61 (12%) were denied, and 27 (5%) led to formal consultation with an infectious disease physician. On multivariate analysis, implementation of the ASP was associated with an approximate 50% reduction in the odds of developing CDI (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.82). The ASP was not associated with decreased mortality at 30 days after discharge or readmission rate. The antimicrobial cost per patient-day decreased by 13.3%, from $10.16 to $8.81. The antimicrobial budget decreased by 15.2%, resulting in a total savings of $228,911. There was a 25.4% decrease in defined daily doses of the target antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ASP was associated with significant reductions in CDI rate, antimicrobial use, and pharmacy costs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organizational Policy , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL