Appraising the causal relationship between thyroid function and rheumatoid arthritis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism are observationally associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but causality is unclear. To evaluate the causal relationship between thyroid function and RA, we conducted a two-Sample bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) study. Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with six phenotypes were selected from the FinnGen biobank database, The ThyroidOmics Consortium database, and the IEU Open GWAS database. For the forward MR analysis, we selected hypothyroidism (N=213,390), Graves' disease (GD) (N=199,034), other types of hyperthyroidism (N=190,799), free thyroxine (FT4, N=49,269), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, N=54,288) as the five related thyroid function phenotypes for exposure, with RA (N=58,284) as the outcome. Reverse MR analysis selected RA as the exposure and five phenotypes of thyroid function as the outcome. The Inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis method, supplemented by weighted median (WM) and MR-Egger methods. Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger regression methods, and leave-one-out analysis were employed to assess sensitivity and pleiotropy. Results: Forward MR evidence indicates that genetic susceptibility to hypothyroidism is associated with an increased risk of RA (ORIvw=1.758, P=7.61×10-5). Reverse MR evidence suggests that genetic susceptibility to RA is associated with an increased risk of hypothyroidism (ORIvw=1.274, P=3.88×10-20), GD (ORIvw=1.269, P=8.15×10-05), and other types of hyperthyroidism (ORIvw=1.141, P=1.80×10-03). There is no evidence to support a forward or reverse causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to RA and FT4, TSH. Conclusion: Our results provide genetic evidence supporting bidirectional causal relationships between thyroid function and RA. These findings inform preventive strategies and interventions targeting RA and thyroid dysfunction.

Efficacy and Postoperative Complication Rates of Different Surgical Approaches for Calcaneal Fractures: A Network Meta-analysis.

Context: Calcaneal fractures (CFs) are the most common kind of tarsal fracture. The choice of surgical approach is a key element in the management of CFs, but the best method remains in dispute. Also, no single approach is appropriate for all kinds of CFs. Objective: The study intended to evaluate the relationship between six surgical approaches for clinical treatment of CFs and prevention of postoperative complications, to provide an evidence-based approach for treatment. Design: The research team performed a meta-analysis using the data from a previously published review and updating that data through a new narrative review. The team performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) from inception until January 2022, with no language restrictions. The search used the following keywords for the search: calcaneus, heel bone, surgical wounds, surgical incisions, prospective trials, prospective trials, and randomized controlled trials. Outcome Measures: The research team compared the complication rates, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and Bohler's angles for the six surgical approaches, which were: (1) the extensive lateral approach (ELA), (2) the sinus tarsi approach (STA), (3) the horizontal arc approach (HAA), (4) the longitudinal approach (LA), (5) the oblique lateral incision (OLI), and (6) the modified incision (MI)). The team summarized the results using a random effects model. Results: The research team analyzed the data from 19 RCTs with 1521 participants. They all were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The complication rates were available for 18 studies, which included 1474 participants. The rates were significantly lower: (1) for HAA compared to ELA, [OR=-2.03; 95% CrI: [-3.63, -0.43)]; (2) for LA compared to ELA (OR=-1.83; 95% CrI: [-2.83, -0.84]); and (3) for STA compared to ELA (OR=- 1.22; 95% CrI: [-1.67, -0.78]). Of the 19 studies, 11 RCTs, with 942 participants, used the AOFAS scale. The probabilities for the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that OLI (0.694 ) >LA (0.596) >HAA (0.51) >STA (0.477) >ELA (0.224). In addition, ELA had the worst SUCRA (0.224). Of the 19 studies, 15 RCTs, with 1376 participants, used the Bohler angle as an outcome measure. The probability of SUCRA for the surgical approaches indicated that LA (0.723) >ELA (0.667) >STA (0.468) >HAA (0.373) >MI (0.27). Conclusions: The meta-analysis provides an evidence-based approach to the clinical treatment of CFs for six surgical approaches. HAA had the best outcomes, and ELA had the worst.