Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 28(9): 1425-1427, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28213796

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Manchester repair, developed in the UK by Donald, described in 1908, and later modified by Fothergill, is a well-studied and proven surgical treatment for uterovaginal prolapse when uterine preservation is desired. This operation is currently not widely performed in parts of the world (USA) but is becoming increasing popular in Europe. The objective of this video is to demonstrate our surgical technique and recommendations for successful completion of the procedure. METHODS: This patient is a 39-year-old woman with two previous vaginal deliveries who presented with a 1-year history of vaginal protrusion. She had no urinary or bowel symptoms. On examination, she had a grade 2 cystocele and uterine descent. She desired surgical management of her uterovaginal prolapse but wished to retain her uterus. The procedure involves mobilizing the vagina and bladder off the cervix and uterosacral cardinal ligament complex anteriorly and laterally. The cervix is then amputated. The ligaments are clamped, cut, and ligated and attached to the anterior cervical remnant with an overlapping suture. This pulls the cervix backward into the pelvis and results in anteversion of the uterus. A posterior and then anterior Sturmdorf suture is used to reconstruct the cervix by covering the amputated cervix with vaginal mucosa. CONCLUSION: The Manchester repair is an operation worth considering in patients where preservation of the uterus is desired. It uses native tissue and has a low complication rate and good long-term results.


Subject(s)
Cystocele/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Uterine Prolapse/surgery , Adult , Cystocele/etiology , Female , Humans , Ligaments/surgery , Pelvic Floor/surgery , Suture Techniques , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Uterine Prolapse/etiology , Uterus/surgery , Vagina/surgery
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 27(4): 637-9, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26612207

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE VIDEO/INTRODUCTION: Vaginal vault prolapse can occur alone or in combination with anterior or posterior compartment prolapse. Apical prolapse has shown a strong correlation with anterior wall prolapse and a moderate correlation with posterior wall prolapse. The McCall culdoplasty uses the extraperitoneal vaginal approach to support the vault at the time of hysterectomy. Sacrospinous fixation and ileococcygeus suspension with or without mesh have also been used for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. The uterosacral ligaments can also be used to re-suspend the vaginal vault using the extraperitoneal or transperitoneal approach. With the extraperitoneal approach, the peritoneal sac, which can be difficult to access at times, especially when there are dense pelvic adhesions, does not need to be opened. The extraperitoneal approach also carries a lower risk of ureteric injury, as the ureters and the bladder can be retracted from the field using a Breisky-Navratil retractor. METHODS: This video, which documents the surgical treatment of a woman with a complete vaginal eversion and grade 3 pelvic organ prolapse (POP), was recorded in a live workshop during the 2015 Urogynaecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery Conference, held in Chennai, India, in January 2015. It is aimed at educating interested surgeons in the technique of extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension. CONCLUSIONS: This video demonstrates the extraperitoneal approach to uterosacral ligament suspension for apical support in women with vaginal vault prolapse.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Ligaments/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Vagina/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans
3.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 52(4): 356-60, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22515404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is important to establish whether research recommendations regarding magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection can be readily translated into clinical practice and achieve the dual objectives of good coverage of the target group, while minimising unnecessary or prolonged exposure to treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all women admitted to a tertiary obstetric centre at 23-32 weeks gestation in the first 12 months following implementation of the guideline 'Magnesium sulphate for the prevention of cerebral palsy'. We determined the number triaged to receive magnesium sulphate, the proportion of infants who received magnesium sulphate prior to delivery and the total number of doses administered. RESULTS: A total of 330 women were admitted at a mean gestational age of 28.2 weeks, and 132/330 (40%) were prescribed magnesium sulphate, of whom 123/132 (93%) delivered. 142/191 (74%) infants born at <32 weeks' gestation received magnesium sulphate prior to delivery, with no significant differences seen by plurality or gestational age. Of the 145 doses administered, only 13 women received more than one dose, and only nine of 145 (7%) doses proved to be unnecessary. The median treatment duration was 3 h 58 min. The infusion was discontinued as result of side effects in 2% of women. CONCLUSION: Research recommendations regarding administration of magnesium sulphate with neuroprotective intent can be successfully translated into clinical practice. Appropriate triaging of women at high risk of imminent preterm birth is feasible, enabling a high level of magnesium sulphate coverage for infants that deliver prior to 32 weeks gestation, with minimal toxicity and a low rate of unnecessary maternal exposure.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy/prevention & control , Infant, Premature, Diseases/prevention & control , Magnesium Sulfate/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Australia , Cohort Studies , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Magnesium Sulfate/adverse effects , Neuroprotective Agents/adverse effects , Obstetric Labor, Premature/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Premature Birth , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Translational Research, Biomedical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL