ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of damage accrual over time is important for evaluating and comparing long-term results of treatment modalities and strategies. Retrospective studies may be useful for assessing long-term damage, especially in rare diseases. We aimed to validate Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) for use in retrospective studies by evaluating its construct validity, reliability, and feasibility in retrospectively collected data. Additionally, we aimed to determine missing items by evaluating Behçet's syndrome patients with different types of organ involvement and long-term follow-up. METHODS: We included 300 patients who had at least 2 clinic visits at 1-year intervals. The construct validity for use in retrospective trials was assessed by comparing BODI scores calculated from patient charts and during face-to-face visits. BODI was additionally scored using retrospective chart data by 2 different observers and by the same observer six months apart, in a blinded manner. The time for filling BODI was evaluated to assess feasibility. Additionally, damaged items that were missing from BODI were identified. RESULTS: There was a good correlation between the retrospective and face-to-face evaluation of BODI (ICC 0.99; %95 CI 0.99-0.99). Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were good (ICC 0.96 and 1, respectively). The main damage items that BODI did not capture were hypertension, liver failure, lung parenchymal involvement, glaucoma, and lymphedema. CONCLUSION: BODI seems to be a reliable and feasible instrument for assessing damage in retrospective studies. Modifying BODI using the additional damage items identified in this study may make it an even better scale.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Dopamine agonist (DA)-induced impulse control disorder (ICD) represents a group of behavioral disorders that are increasingly recognized in patients with prolactinoma. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the genetic component of the underlying mechanism of DA-induced ICD. METHODS: Patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist (cabergoline) treatment were included in the study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who developed ICD due to DA and patients who did not. Patients were evaluated for polymorphisms of the DRD1, DRD3, COMT, DDC, GRIN2B, TPH2, OPRK1, OPRM1, SLC6A4, SLC6A3, HTR2A genes. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients with prolactinoma using cabergoline, 20 were diagnosed with ICD. When patients with and without ICD were compared according to genotype frequencies, OPRK1/rs702764, DRD3/rs6280, HTR2A/rs6313, SLC6A4/rs7224199, GRIN2B/rs7301328, TPH2/rs7305115, COMT/rs4680, DRD1/rs4532 polymorphisms significantly increased in patients with DA-induced ICD. CONCLUSION: Our results show that multiple neurotransmission systems affect DA-induced ICD in patients with prolactinoma.