Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 43(9): 455-466, 2019 Nov.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351747

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based. RESULTS: Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current guidelines, there might be an overuse of heparins in the daily clinical practice. The development of -direct oral- anticoagulants have shown to reduce the time to reintroduction of medication for chronic conditions as well as a more effective bleeding management.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Urologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods
2.
Med Intensiva ; 39(9): 552-62, 2015 Dec.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183121

ABSTRACT

In recent years, several safety alerts have questioned or restricted the use of some pharmacological alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion in established indications. In contrast, there seems to be a promotion of other alternatives, based on blood products and/or antifibrinolytic drugs, which lack a solid scientific basis. The Multidisciplinary Autotransfusion Study Group and the Anemia Working Group España convened a multidisciplinary panel of 23 experts belonging to different healthcare areas in a forum for debate to: 1) analyze the different safety alerts referred to certain transfusion alternatives; 2) study the background leading to such alternatives, the evidence supporting them, and their consequences for everyday clinical practice, and 3) issue a weighted statement on the safety of each questioned transfusion alternative, according to its clinical use. The members of the forum maintained telematics contact for the exchange of information and the distribution of tasks, and a joint meeting was held where the conclusions on each of the items examined were presented and discussed. A first version of the document was drafted, and subjected to 4 rounds of review and updating until consensus was reached (unanimously in most cases). We present the final version of the document, approved by all panel members, and hope it will be useful for our colleagues.


Subject(s)
Anemia/therapy , Critical Illness/therapy , Hemorrhage/therapy , Anemia/drug therapy , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Aprotinin/adverse effects , Aprotinin/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Factors/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Blood Transfusion/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic , Crystalloid Solutions , Erythropoietin/adverse effects , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Hematinics/adverse effects , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Humans , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives/adverse effects , Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives/therapeutic use , Iron/adverse effects , Iron/therapeutic use , Isotonic Solutions/adverse effects , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic , Plasma Substitutes/adverse effects , Plasma Substitutes/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Transfusion Reaction
4.
Rev Clin Esp ; 204(4): 221-7, 2004 Apr.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15104934

ABSTRACT

The interaction between the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque prone to disruption and thrombus formation is the cornerstone of acute coronary syndromes (ACS): unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation. Platelet adhesion and aggregation and clotting activation, at the level of injured endothelium lacking thromborresistance properties, and directly implicated in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis. Tissue factor emerges as the initial mechanism leading to thrombin generation and fibrin formation to stabilize the platelet-rich thrombus. The combination of several antithrombotic strategies, including fibrinolytics, antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel, and GpIIb/IIIa antagonists), and anticoagulants (mainly low-molecular-weight heparins) has proven to be of great benefit in the reduction of ischemic events and in the prevention of recurrences after ACS.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/blood , Coronary Disease/drug therapy , Hematologic Agents/therapeutic use , Hemostasis/physiology , Acute Disease , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL