Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ; 55(3): 476-91, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20228318

ABSTRACT

The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory-3 is a brief, self-administered screening tool designed to measure the probability of having a substance dependence disorder. The present study assessed the validity of this instrument with an inmate population using a DSM-IV diagnosis of substance dependence as the criterion measure. The study also examined instrument validity by gender. Findings revealed differences in the prediction of dependence between male and female inmates. The advantages and shortcomings of the instrument are discussed in light of these findings, and suggestions for future research are advanced.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/psychology , Illicit Drugs , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Prisoners/legislation & jurisprudence , Prisoners/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adult , Alcoholism/rehabilitation , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation
2.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol ; 54(3): 378-94, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19398588

ABSTRACT

This study examines the effect of inmate and institutional characteristics on inmate victimization during incarceration. In addition, it examines whether factors related to inmate victimization varies by perpetrator type, specifically inmate versus staff victimizer. Self-reported data from 247 male and female inmates confined to eight correctional institutions are collected, including questions regarding their experiences of staff-on-inmate and inmate-on-inmate victimization. Results show that similar institutional-level variables predict both types of inmate victimization; however, there are some differences between outcomes based on inmate-level characteristics. The authors address possible explanations for the results and suggest several policy implications to reduce the incidence of prison violence.


Subject(s)
Crime Victims/legislation & jurisprudence , Crime Victims/psychology , Individuality , Prisoners/psychology , Prisons/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Aggression/psychology , Coercion , Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Female , Hierarchy, Social , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Professional Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Misconduct/psychology , Professional Misconduct/statistics & numerical data , Southeastern United States , Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Violence/psychology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL