Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Nephrol ; 26(4): 675-82, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23100180

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: HERMEX is a population-based study which tries to evaluate the relative weight of cardiovascular risk factors in inhabitants of Extremadura, Spain. This report presents the data about chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a Spanish population sample. METHODS: For an observational cross-sectional population-based study, 3,402 subjects were randomly selected from health care system records. The final sample included 2,813 participants (mean age 51.2 years, 53.5% women). Renal function was estimated from serum creatinine using the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) Study and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Individual renal risk was calculated using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) table. RESULTS: Using the CKD-EPI formula, 3.6% of participants had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min. MDRD-4 gave a result of 4.0%. Prevalence of albuminuria was 5.5%. Taken together, in patients with albuminuria and/or reduced GFR, the prevalence of renal disease was 8.1%. The KDIGO renal risk table suggested that 0.05% of patients were at high or very high risk of CKD progression and 1.6% at medium risk. CKD was more common in those who were obese, hypertensive, dyslipidemic or had diabetes. Multivariate analysis showed an independent negative association of CKD as dependent variable with systolic blood pressure and body mass index, but a positive correlation with diastolic blood pressure and male sex. CONCLUSIONS: A low frequency of abnormal GFR was detected in a randomly selected sample of the Spanish general population. This finding agreed with the low rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity observed in Spain in spite of a high prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiology , Albuminuria/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology
2.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 42(12): 1272-7, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22998081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HERMEX is a population-based study which try to evaluate the relative weight of cardiovascular risk factors in the population of Extremadura. This report provides the data obtained about microalbuminuria in a large Spanish population. DESIGN AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, population-based study. A total of 3402 subjects were randomly selected from the Health Care System of Extremadura. The final sample included 2813 subjects (mean age 51·2 years, 53·5% female). Urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in first morning urine sample was analysed. Microalbuminuria was diagnosed when UAER was ≥ 22 in men or ≥ 31 mg/g in women. RESULTS: Prevalence of abnormal UAER in general population was 5·5% (microalbuminuria: 4·7%; proteinuria 0·8%). Microalbuminuria grew slightly in patients between 65 and 74 years and showed a dramatic increase in subject older than 75 years (P < 0·001). Men showed a high prevalence of microalbuminuria (5·8% vs. women 3·6%; P = 0·006 chi-squared test). Increased UAER was more common in obese subjects (6·7% vs. 2·3%, P < 0·001), hypertensive patients (8·3% vs. 2·3%, P < 0·001) and diabetic ones (10·9% vs. 3·7%, P < 0·001). The multivariate analysis showed a positive correlation of abnormal UAER with body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, plasma creatinine and triglyceride levels. CONCLUSIONS: A low frequency of abnormal UAER was detected in a randomly selected sample of Spanish general population. This finding agreed with the low rates of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity observed in Spain in spite of a high prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Albuminuria/diagnosis , Biomarkers/urine , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/urine , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/urine , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obesity/complications , Obesity/urine , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology
3.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 25(6): 519-524, nov.-dic. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-104221

ABSTRACT

Objetivos La unificación de criterios para el diagnóstico del síndrome metabólico, junto con la propuesta de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de eliminar de ellos a los pacientes con diabetes o con enfermedades cardiovasculares, cambiará la estimación de su prevalencia. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la prevalencia del síndrome metabólico en un área de salud extremeña siguiendo ambas recomendaciones. Métodos Estudio transversal, poblacional, con selección aleatoria de individuos entre 25 y 79 años de edad, en un Área de Salud de Badajoz. Se recogieron los antecedentes de factores de riesgo cardiovascular, la presión arterial y el perímetro abdominal, y una muestra de sangre en ayunas. Se comparó la prevalencia del síndrome metabólico siguiendo los recientes criterios, por sexo y edad. Resultados Se reclutaron 2.833 personas, el 46,5% eran hombres, y la edad media 51,2 años. La prevalencia del síndrome metabólico fue del 33,6%, significativamente mayor en los hombres (36,7% frente a 30,9%; p<0,001) y con una disminución significativa al excluir la diabetes y la enfermedad cardiovascular (20,8%; p<0,001). La diferencia de prevalencia con los distintos criterios fue significativa para el total y por sexo (p<0,001), a partir del decenio de edad de 45-54 años en los hombres y de 55-64 años en las mujeres. Conclusiones La prevalencia de síndrome metabólico en el área estudiada es de las más altas halladas en España en estudios poblacionales. Aunque se reduce con las nuevas recomendaciones internacionales, indica una población considerable y joven en la cual aplicar medidas preventivas (AU)


Objectives The unification of criteria for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, together with the subsequent World Health Organization (WHO) proposal to eliminate diabetes and cardiovascular diseases from the diagnostic criteria, will change estimates of the known prevalence of this syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a health area of Badajoz (Spain) using the latest consensus criteria and eliminating diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Methods We performed a cross-sectional population-wide study of randomly selected individuals aged between 25 and 79 years old in a health area of Badajoz. In all patients, data on their history of cardiovascular risk factors were gathered, waist circumference and blood pressure were measured and a fasting blood sample was collected. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome, following recent criteria, was compared by age and gender. Results We recruited 2,833 individuals (46.5% men). The mean age was 51.2 years The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 33.6% and was significantly higher in men (36.7% vs 30.9%; p<0.001). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome fell significantly after exclusion of patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease (20.8%; p<0.001). The difference in prevalence between the distinct criteria was significant for the whole population and by sex (p<0.000). A significant difference in prevalence between genders was observed from the age of 45-54 years in men and 55-64 years in women Conclusions The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a health area of Badajoz is among the highest reported in population-based studies in Spain. Although estimates of the prevalence are decreased by the new international recommendations, a considerable proportion of the young population requires preventive measures (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Age and Sex Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Abdominal Circumference , Hypertension/epidemiology
4.
Gac Sanit ; 25(6): 519-24, 2011.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21803460

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The unification of criteria for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, together with the subsequent World Health Organization (WHO) proposal to eliminate diabetes and cardiovascular diseases from the diagnostic criteria, will change estimates of the known prevalence of this syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a health area of Badajoz (Spain) using the latest consensus criteria and eliminating diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional population-wide study of randomly selected individuals aged between 25 and 79 years old in a health area of Badajoz. In all patients, data on their history of cardiovascular risk factors were gathered, waist circumference and blood pressure were measured and a fasting blood sample was collected. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome, following recent criteria, was compared by age and gender. RESULTS: We recruited 2,833 individuals (46.5% men). The mean age was 51.2 years The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 33.6% and was significantly higher in men (36.7% vs 30.9%; p < 0.001). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome fell significantly after exclusion of patients with diabetes or cardiovascular disease (20.8%; p < 0.001). The difference in prevalence between the distinct criteria was significant for the whole population and by sex (p < 0.000). A significant difference in prevalence between genders was observed from the age of 45-54 years in men and 55-64 years in women CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a health area of Badajoz is among the highest reported in population-based studies in Spain. Although estimates of the prevalence are decreased by the new international recommendations, a considerable proportion of the young population requires preventive measures.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lipids/blood , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prediabetic State/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Waist Circumference , World Health Organization
7.
Cardiol J ; 16(1): 57-67, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19130417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the number of optimally controlled hypertensive patients is higher using self-measurement of blood pressure at home and ambulatory monitoring, compared to using conventional blood pressure measurements at the doctor's office. METHOD: An observational, cross-sectional, multicentre, descriptive study of a random sample of 237 primary health care patients, known to be hypertensive, from Badajoz (Spain). Blood pressure was measured at the doctor's office and by self-measurement at home. Those patients showing good control by self-measurement were subjected to 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. Optimal control was understood as blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg when measured at the doctor's office, and < 135/85 mm Hg when self-measured at home and by daytime ambulatory monitoring. RESULTS: Mean systolic/diastolic measurements at the doctor's office and by self-measurement were 145.6/83.9 and 134.0/78.7 mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.000). In the population optimally controlled by self-measurement and who subsequently received ambulatory monitoring, the mean blood pressure was 121.8/73.4 and 125.6/76.2 mm Hg, respectively (p = 0.002; p < 0.000). When measured at the doctor's office blood pressure was controlled in about 29.5% (95% CI 23.7-35.3%) of patients, in 38% when self-measured (95% CI 31.4-44.2%; p < 0.000), and in 24.5% when it was confirmed through ambulatory monitoring (95% CI 15.4-33.6%). Sensitivity and positive predictive values of the office measurements for the detection of patients who were well-controlled by self-measurement were 50% and 64.3%, respectively, and 53.4% and 73.8% as regards ambulatory monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of control is achieved with self-measurement at home not confirmed by ambulatory monitoring. Therefore, the white coat effect does not seem to influence the percentage of well-controlled patients detected at the doctor's office. Office blood pressure does not appear to be useful in distinguishing which individual patients are optimally controlled.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/diagnosis , Office Visits , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diastole , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Primary Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spain , Systole
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL