Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia after lung transplantation and its potential relationship with the development of post-transplant complications.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia (EBVd) may act as a surrogate marker of post-transplant immunosuppression. This hypothesis has not been tested so far in lung transplant (LT) recipients. METHODS: We included 63 patients undergoing lung transplantation at our center between October 2008 and May 2013. Whole blood EBVd was systematically assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction assay on a quarterly basis. The occurrence of late complications (overall and opportunistic infection [OI] and chronic lung allograft dysfunction [CLAD]) was analyzed according to the detection of EBVd within the first 6 months post transplantation. RESULTS: Any EBVd was detected in 30 (47.6%) patients. Peak EBVd was higher in patients with late overall infection (2.23 vs. 1.73 log10 copies/mL; P = 0.026) and late OI (2.39 vs. 1.74 log10 copies/mL; P = 0.004). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting both events were 0.806 and 0.871 respectively. The presence of an EBVd ≥2 log10 copies/mL during the first 6 months post transplantation was associated with a higher risk of late OI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 7.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-29.85; P = 0.002). Patients with detectable EBVd during the first 6 months also had lower CLAD-free survival (P = 0.035), although this association did not remain statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (aHR 1.26; 95% CI 0.87-5.29; P = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary in nature, our results suggest that the detection of EBVd within the first 6 months after transplantation is associated with the subsequent occurrence of late OI in LT recipients.

Should Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Be Systematically Treated in Kidney Transplant Recipients? Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The indication for antimicrobial treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) after kidney transplantation (KT) remains controversial. Between January 2011 and December 2013, 112 KT recipients that developed one episode or more of AB beyond the second month after transplantation were included in this open-label trial. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) to the treatment group (systematic antimicrobial therapy for all episodes of AB occurring ≤24 mo after transplantation [53 patients]) or control group (no antimicrobial therapy [59 patients]). Systematic screening for AB was performed similarly in both groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of acute pyelonephritis at 24-mo follow-up. Secondary outcomes included lower urinary tract infection, acute rejection, Clostridium difficile infection, colonization or infection by multidrug-resistant bacteria, graft function and all-cause mortality. There were no differences in the primary outcome in the intention-to-treat population (7.5% [4 of 53] in the treatment group vs. 8.4% [5 of 59] in the control group; odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-3.47) or the per-protocol population (3.8% [1 of 26] in the treatment group vs. 8.0% [4 of 50] in the control group; OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.05-4.34). Moreover, we found no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, systematic screening and treatment of AB beyond the second month after transplantation provided no apparent benefit among KT recipients (NCT02373085).