Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Cell Mol Life Sci ; 81(1): 160, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564048

ABSTRACT

The androgen receptor (AR) is a primary target for treating prostate cancer (PCa), forming the bedrock of its clinical management. Despite their efficacy, resistance often hampers AR-targeted therapies, necessitating new strategies against therapy-resistant PCa. These resistances involve various mechanisms, including AR splice variant overexpression and altered activities of transcription factors like the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and FOXA1. These factors rely on common coregulators, such as EP300/CREBBP, suggesting a rationale for coregulator-targeted therapies. Our study explores EP300/CREBBP acetyltransferase inhibition's impact on steroid receptor and FOXA1 signaling in PCa cells using genome-wide techniques. Results reveal that EP300/CREBBP inhibition significantly disrupts the AR-regulated transcriptome and receptor chromatin binding by reducing the AR-gene expression. Similarly, GR's regulated transcriptome and receptor binding were hindered, not linked to reduced GR expression but to diminished FOXA1 chromatin binding, restricting GR signaling. Overall, our findings highlight how EP300/CREBBP inhibition distinctively curtails oncogenic transcription factors' signaling, suggesting the potential of coregulatory-targeted therapies in PCa.


Subject(s)
Prostate , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Transcription Factors , Chromatin , Acetyltransferases , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha/genetics , E1A-Associated p300 Protein/genetics , CREB-Binding Protein/genetics
2.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 2024 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554106

ABSTRACT

The use of androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors in prostate cancer gives rise to increased cellular lineage plasticity resulting in resistance to AR-targeted therapies. In this study, we examined the chromatin landscape of AR-positive prostate cancer cells post-exposure to the AR inhibitor enzalutamide. We identified a novel regulator of cell plasticity, the homeobox transcription factor SIX2, whose motif is enriched in accessible chromatin regions after treatment. Depletion of SIX2 in androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells induced a switch from a stem-like to an epithelial state, resulting in reduced cancer-related properties such as proliferation, colony formation, and metastasis both in vitro and in vivo. These effects were mediated through the downregulation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway and subsequent reduction of nuclear ß-catenin. Collectively, our findings provide compelling evidence that the depletion of SIX2 may represent a promising strategy for overcoming the cell plasticity mechanisms driving antiandrogen resistance in prostate cancer.

3.
Commun Biol ; 7(1): 108, 2024 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238517

ABSTRACT

Treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-NEPC) is a lethal subtype of castration-resistant prostate cancer resistant to androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors. Our study unveils that AR suppresses the neuronal development protein dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 5 (DPYSL5), providing a mechanism for neuroendocrine transformation under androgen deprivation therapy. Our unique CRPC-NEPC cohort, comprising 135 patient tumor samples, including 55 t-NEPC patient samples, exhibits a high expression of DPYSL5 in t-NEPC patient tumors. DPYSL5 correlates with neuroendocrine-related markers and inversely with AR and PSA. DPYSL5 overexpression in prostate cancer cells induces a neuron-like phenotype, enhances invasion, proliferation, and upregulates stemness and neuroendocrine-related markers. Mechanistically, DPYSL5 promotes prostate cancer cell plasticity via EZH2-mediated PRC2 activation. Depletion of DPYSL5 decreases proliferation, induces G1 phase cell cycle arrest, reverses neuroendocrine phenotype, and upregulates luminal genes. In conclusion, DPYSL5 plays a critical role in regulating prostate cancer cell plasticity, and we propose the AR/DPYSL5/EZH2/PRC2 axis as a driver of t-NEPC progression.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Androgen Antagonists , Prostate/pathology , Hydrolases , Microtubule-Associated Proteins , Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein/genetics
4.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 52(2): 625-642, 2024 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38015476

ABSTRACT

Treatment of prostate cancer relies predominantly on the inhibition of androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Despite the initial effectiveness of the antiandrogen therapies, the cancer often develops resistance to the AR blockade. One mechanism of the resistance is glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated replacement of AR function. Nevertheless, the mechanistic ways and means how the GR-mediated antiandrogen resistance occurs have remained elusive. Here, we have discovered several crucial features of GR action in prostate cancer cells through genome-wide techniques. We detected that the replacement of AR by GR in enzalutamide-exposed prostate cancer cells occurs almost exclusively at pre-accessible chromatin sites displaying FOXA1 occupancy. Counterintuitively to the classical pioneer factor model, silencing of FOXA1 potentiated the chromatin binding and transcriptional activity of GR. This was attributed to FOXA1-mediated repression of the NR3C1 (gene encoding GR) expression via the corepressor TLE3. Moreover, the small-molecule inhibition of coactivator p300's enzymatic activity efficiently restricted GR-mediated gene regulation and cell proliferation. Overall, we identified chromatin pre-accessibility and FOXA1-mediated repression as important regulators of GR action in prostate cancer, pointing out new avenues to oppose steroid receptor-mediated antiandrogen resistance.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Prostatic Neoplasms , Receptors, Glucocorticoid , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatin/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha/genetics , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alpha/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism
5.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1260826, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38023254

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of death among men worldwide, and thus, research on the genetic factors enabling the formation of treatment-resistant cancer cells is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Here, we report a cell line-specific dependence on FANCI and related signaling pathways to counteract the effects of DNA-damaging chemotherapy in prostate cancer. Our results reveal that FANCI depletion results in significant downregulation of Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway members in prostate cancer cells, indicating that FANCI is an important regulator of the FA pathway. Furthermore, we found that FANCI silencing reduces proliferation in p53-expressing prostate cancer cells. This extends the evidence that inactivation of FANCI may convert cancer cells from a resistant state to an eradicable state under the stress of DNA-damaging chemotherapy. Our results also indicate that high expression of FA pathway genes correlates with poorer survival in prostate cancer patients. Moreover, genomic alterations of FA pathway members are prevalent in prostate adenocarcinoma patients; mutation and copy number information for the FA pathway genes in seven patient cohorts (N = 1,732 total tumor samples) reveals that 1,025 (59.2%) tumor samples have an alteration in at least one of the FA pathway genes, suggesting that genomic alteration of the pathway is a prominent feature in patients with the disease.

6.
Sci Adv ; 9(24): eade1122, 2023 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37315128

ABSTRACT

How chromatin dynamics relate to transcriptional activity remains poorly understood. Using single-molecule tracking, coupled with machine learning, we show that histone H2B and multiple chromatin-bound transcriptional regulators display two distinct low-mobility states. Ligand activation results in a marked increase in the propensity of steroid receptors to bind in the lowest-mobility state. Mutational analysis revealed that interactions with chromatin in the lowest-mobility state require an intact DNA binding domain and oligomerization domains. These states are not spatially separated as previously believed, but individual H2B and bound-TF molecules can dynamically switch between them on time scales of seconds. Single bound-TF molecules with different mobilities exhibit different dwell time distributions, suggesting that the mobility of TFs is intimately coupled with their binding dynamics. Together, our results identify two unique and distinct low-mobility states that appear to represent common pathways for transcription activation in mammalian cells.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Histones , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Histones/genetics , Machine Learning , Protein Domains , Single Molecule Imaging , Mammals
7.
EMBO Rep ; 23(1): e53083, 2022 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34699114

ABSTRACT

Here, we investigate the impact of hypoxia on the hepatic response of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to dexamethasone (DEX) in mice via RNA-sequencing. Hypoxia causes three types of reprogramming of GR: (i) much weaker induction of classical GR-responsive genes by DEX in hypoxia, (ii) a number of genes is induced by DEX specifically in hypoxia, and (iii) hypoxia induces a group of genes via activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Transcriptional profiles are reflected by changed GR DNA-binding as measured by ChIP sequencing. The HPA axis is induced by hypothalamic HIF1α and HIF2α activation and leads to GR-dependent lipolysis and ketogenesis. Acute inflammation, induced by lipopolysaccharide, is prevented by DEX in normoxia but not during hypoxia, and this is attributed to HPA axis activation by hypoxia. We unfold new physiological pathways that have consequences for patients suffering from GC resistance.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids , Receptors, Glucocorticoid , Animals , Dexamethasone/metabolism , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/metabolism , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/metabolism , Hypoxia/genetics , Hypoxia/metabolism , Mice , Pituitary-Adrenal System/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism
8.
Cell Metab ; 33(9): 1763-1776.e5, 2021 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34302744

ABSTRACT

Sepsis is a potentially lethal syndrome resulting from a maladaptive response to infection. Upon infection, glucocorticoids are produced as a part of the compensatory response to tolerate sepsis. This tolerance is, however, mitigated in sepsis due to a quickly induced glucocorticoid resistance at the level of the glucocorticoid receptor. Here, we show that defects in the glucocorticoid receptor signaling pathway aggravate sepsis pathophysiology by lowering lactate clearance and sensitizing mice to lactate-induced toxicity. The latter is exerted via an uncontrolled production of vascular endothelial growth factor, resulting in vascular leakage and collapse with severe hypotension, organ damage, and death, all being typical features of a lethal form of sepsis. In conclusion, sepsis leads to glucocorticoid receptor failure and hyperlactatemia, which collectively leads to a lethal vascular collapse.


Subject(s)
Hyperlactatemia , Sepsis , Animals , Glucocorticoids , Lactic Acid , Mice , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/metabolism , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
9.
Endocr Relat Cancer ; 28(9): R231-R250, 2021 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34137734

ABSTRACT

Steroid receptors (SRs) constitute an important class of signal-dependent transcription factors (TFs). They regulate a variety of key biological processes and are crucial drug targets in many disease states. In particular, estrogen (ER) and androgen receptors (AR) drive the development and progression of breast and prostate cancer, respectively. Thus, they represent the main specific drug targets in these diseases. Recent evidence has suggested that the crosstalk between signal-dependent TFs is an important step in the reprogramming of chromatin sites; a signal-activated TF can expand or restrict the chromatin binding of another TF. This crosstalk can rewire gene programs and thus alter biological processes and influence the progression of disease. Lately, it has been postulated that there may be an important crosstalk between the AR and the ER with other SRs. Especially, progesterone (PR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) can reprogram chromatin binding of ER and gene programs in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, GR can take the place of AR in antiandrogen-resistant prostate cancer cells. Here, we review the current knowledge of the crosstalk between SRs in breast and prostate cancers. We emphasize how the activity of ER and AR on chromatin can be modulated by other SRs on a genome-wide scale. We also highlight the knowledge gaps in the interplay of SRs and their complex interactions with other signaling pathways and suggest how to experimentally fill in these gaps.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Receptors, Steroid , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Progesterone , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics , Receptors, Steroid/genetics
10.
Oncogene ; 40(27): 4567-4579, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127815

ABSTRACT

Treatment of prostate cancer confronts resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies. AR-associated coregulators and chromatin proteins hold a great potential for novel therapy targets. Here, we employed a powerful chromatin-directed proteomics approach termed ChIP-SICAP to uncover the composition of chromatin protein network, the chromatome, around endogenous AR in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells. In addition to several expected AR coregulators, the chromatome contained many nuclear proteins not previously associated with the AR. In the context of androgen signaling in CRPC cells, we further investigated the role of a known AR-associated protein, a chromatin remodeler SMARCA4 and that of SIM2, a transcription factor without a previous association with AR. To understand their role in chromatin accessibility and AR target gene expression, we integrated data from ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and functional experiments. Despite the wide co-occurrence of SMARCA4 and AR on chromatin, depletion of SMARCA4 influenced chromatin accessibility and expression of a restricted set of AR target genes, especially those involved in cell morphogenetic changes in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The depletion also inhibited the CRPC cell growth, validating SMARCA4's functional role in CRPC cells. Although silencing of SIM2 reduced chromatin accessibility similarly, it affected the expression of a much larger group of androgen-regulated genes, including those involved in cellular responses to external stimuli and steroid hormone stimulus. The silencing also reduced proliferation of CRPC cells and tumor size in chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay, further emphasizing the importance of SIM2 in CRPC cells and pointing to the functional relevance of this potential prostate cancer biomarker in CRPC cells. Overall, the chromatome of AR identified in this work is an important resource for the field focusing on this important drug target.


Subject(s)
Receptors, Androgen , Animals , Chick Embryo , Male , Prostate , Proteomics
11.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 1987, 2021 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33790284

ABSTRACT

A widely regarded model for glucocorticoid receptor (GR) action postulates that dimeric binding to DNA regulates unfavorable metabolic pathways while monomeric receptor binding promotes repressive gene responses related to its anti-inflammatory effects. This model has been built upon the characterization of the GRdim mutant, reported to be incapable of DNA binding and dimerization. Although quantitative live-cell imaging data shows GRdim as mostly dimeric, genomic studies based on recovery of enriched half-site response elements suggest monomeric engagement on DNA. Here, we perform genome-wide studies on GRdim and a constitutively monomeric mutant. Our results show that impairing dimerization affects binding even to open chromatin. We also find that GRdim does not exclusively bind half-response elements. Our results do not support a physiological role for monomeric GR and are consistent with a common mode of receptor binding via higher order structures that drives both the activating and repressive actions of glucocorticoids.


Subject(s)
DNA/metabolism , Genome-Wide Association Study/methods , Protein Multimerization , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/chemistry , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , DNA/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Glucocorticoids/metabolism , Humans , Mice , Mutation , Protein Binding , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Response Elements/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics
12.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 49(12): 6605-6620, 2021 07 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592625

ABSTRACT

Single-molecule tracking (SMT) allows the study of transcription factor (TF) dynamics in the nucleus, giving important information regarding the diffusion and binding behavior of these proteins in the nuclear environment. Dwell time distributions obtained by SMT for most TFs appear to follow bi-exponential behavior. This has been ascribed to two discrete populations of TFs-one non-specifically bound to chromatin and another specifically bound to target sites, as implied by decades of biochemical studies. However, emerging studies suggest alternate models for dwell-time distributions, indicating the existence of more than two populations of TFs (multi-exponential distribution), or even the absence of discrete states altogether (power-law distribution). Here, we present an analytical pipeline to evaluate which model best explains SMT data. We find that a broad spectrum of TFs (including glucocorticoid receptor, oestrogen receptor, FOXA1, CTCF) follow a power-law distribution of dwell-times, blurring the temporal line between non-specific and specific binding, suggesting that productive binding may involve longer binding events than previously believed. From these observations, we propose a continuum of affinities model to explain TF dynamics, that is consistent with complex interactions of TFs with multiple nuclear domains as well as binding and searching on the chromatin template.


Subject(s)
Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Kinetics , Mice , Models, Biological , Photobleaching , Protein Binding , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Single Molecule Imaging
13.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 49(4): 1951-1971, 2021 02 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524141

ABSTRACT

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is an essential transcription factor (TF), controlling metabolism, development and immune responses. SUMOylation regulates chromatin occupancy and target gene expression of GR in a locus-selective manner, but the mechanism of regulation has remained elusive. Here, we identify the protein network around chromatin-bound GR by using selective isolation of chromatin-associated proteins and show that the network is affected by receptor SUMOylation, with several nuclear receptor coregulators and chromatin modifiers preferring interaction with SUMOylation-deficient GR and proteins implicated in transcriptional repression preferring interaction with SUMOylation-competent GR. This difference is reflected in our chromatin binding, chromatin accessibility and gene expression data, showing that the SUMOylation-deficient GR is more potent in binding and opening chromatin at glucocorticoid-regulated enhancers and inducing expression of target loci. Blockage of SUMOylation by a SUMO-activating enzyme inhibitor (ML-792) phenocopied to a large extent the consequences of GR SUMOylation deficiency on chromatin binding and target gene expression. Our results thus show that SUMOylation modulates the specificity of GR by regulating its chromatin protein network and accessibility at GR-bound enhancers. We speculate that many other SUMOylated TFs utilize a similar regulatory mechanism.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Sumoylation , Binding Sites , Gene Expression Regulation , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 1/metabolism , Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 1 , Protein Interaction Mapping , Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Proteins/metabolism , Sumoylation/drug effects
14.
Mol Cell ; 81(7): 1484-1498.e6, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561389

ABSTRACT

Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression by binding to specific consensus motifs within the local chromatin context. The mechanisms by which TFs navigate the nuclear environment as they search for binding sites remain unclear. Here, we used single-molecule tracking and machine-learning-based classification to directly measure the nuclear mobility of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in live cells. We revealed two distinct and dynamic low-mobility populations. One accounts for specific binding to chromatin, while the other represents a confinement state that requires an intrinsically disordered region (IDR), implicated in liquid-liquid condensate subdomains. Further analysis showed that the dwell times of both subpopulations follow a power-law distribution, consistent with a broad distribution of affinities on the GR cistrome and interactome. Together, our data link IDRs with a confinement state that is functionally distinct from specific chromatin binding and modulates the transcriptional output by increasing the local concentration of TFs at specific sites.


Subject(s)
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/chemistry , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/chemistry , Transcription Factors/chemistry , Animals , Female , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/genetics , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Rats , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
15.
Cell Rep ; 28(13): 3523-3534.e2, 2019 09 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31553919

ABSTRACT

Transcription factors (TFs) must access chromatin to bind to their response elements and regulate gene expression. A widely accepted model proposes that only a special subset of TFs, pioneer factors, can associate with condensed chromatin and initiate chromatin opening. We previously reported that steroid receptors (SRs), not considered pioneer factors, can assist the binding of an archetypal pioneer, the forkhead box protein 1 (FOXA1), at a subset of receptor-activated enhancers. These findings have been challenged recently, with the suggestion that newly acquired data fully support the prevailing pioneer model. Here, we reexamine our results and confirm the original conclusions. We also analyze and discuss a number of available datasets relevant to chromatin penetration by SRs and find a general consensus supporting our original observations. Hence, we propose that chromatin opening at some sites can be initiated by SRs, with a parallel recruitment of factors often treated as having a unique pioneer function. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Glont et al. (2019), published in Cell Reports.


Subject(s)
Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly/genetics , Receptors, Steroid/metabolism , Humans
16.
Genome Res ; 29(8): 1223-1234, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31337711

ABSTRACT

Most transcription factors, including nuclear receptors, are widely modeled as binding regulatory elements as monomers, homodimers, or heterodimers. Recent findings in live cells show that the glucocorticoid receptor NR3C1 (also known as GR) forms tetramers on enhancers, owing to an allosteric alteration induced by DNA binding, and suggest that higher oligomerization states are important for the gene regulatory responses of GR. By using a variant (GRtetra) that mimics this allosteric transition, we performed genome-wide studies using a GR knockout cell line with reintroduced wild-type GR or reintroduced GRtetra. GRtetra acts as a super receptor by binding to response elements not accessible to the wild-type receptor and both induces and represses more genes than GRwt. These results argue that DNA binding induces a structural transition to the tetrameric state, forming a transient higher-order structure that drives both the activating and repressive actions of glucocorticoids.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/ultrastructure , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Genome , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/chemistry , Animals , Base Sequence , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatin/chemistry , DNA/genetics , DNA/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Female , Gene Editing/methods , Glucocorticoids/metabolism , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism , Mammary Glands, Animal/pathology , Mice , Protein Binding , Protein Structure, Quaternary , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Transcriptional Activation
17.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 116(26): 12942-12951, 2019 06 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182584

ABSTRACT

Glucocorticoid resistance (GCR) is defined as an unresponsiveness to the therapeutic effects, including the antiinflammatory ones of glucocorticoids (GCs) and their receptor, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). It is a problem in the management of inflammatory diseases and can be congenital as well as acquired. The strong proinflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha (TNF) induces an acute form of GCR, not only in mice, but also in several cell lines: e.g., in the hepatoma cell line BWTG3, as evidenced by impaired Dexamethasone (Dex)-stimulated direct GR-dependent gene up- and down-regulation. We report that TNF has a significant and broad impact on this transcriptional performance of GR, but no impact on nuclear translocation, dimerization, or DNA binding capacity of GR. Proteome-wide proximity-mapping (BioID), however, revealed that the GR interactome was strongly modulated by TNF. One GR cofactor that interacted significantly less with the receptor under GCR conditions is p300. NFκB activation and p300 knockdown both reduced direct transcriptional output of GR whereas p300 overexpression and NFκB inhibition reverted TNF-induced GCR, which is in support of a cofactor reshuffle model. This hypothesis was supported by FRET studies. This mechanism of GCR opens avenues for therapeutic interventions in GCR diseases.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance/genetics , E1A-Associated p300 Protein/metabolism , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Inflammation/drug therapy , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , A549 Cells , Animals , Cell Nucleus/drug effects , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Down-Regulation/immunology , E1A-Associated p300 Protein/genetics , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Mice , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Protein Interaction Mapping , Protein Interaction Maps/drug effects , Protein Interaction Maps/immunology , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , RNA-Seq , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/immunology , Up-Regulation/drug effects , Up-Regulation/immunology
18.
Endocr Relat Cancer ; 25(7): R385-R404, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29692347

ABSTRACT

Reprogramming of the chromatin landscape is a critical component to the transcriptional response in breast cancer. Effects of sex hormones such as estrogens and progesterone have been well described to have a critical impact on breast cancer proliferation. However, the complex network of the chromatin landscape, enhancer regions and mode of function of steroid receptors (SRs) and other transcription factors (TFs), is an intricate web of signaling and functional processes that is still largely misunderstood at the mechanistic level. In this review, we describe what is currently known about the dynamic interplay between TFs with chromatin and the reprogramming of enhancer elements. Emphasis has been placed on characterizing the different modes of action of TFs in regulating enhancer activity, specifically, how different SRs target enhancer regions to reprogram chromatin in breast cancer cells. In addition, we discuss current techniques employed to study enhancer function at a genome-wide level. Further, we have noted recent advances in live cell imaging technology. These single-cell approaches enable the coupling of population-based assays with real-time studies to address many unsolved questions about SRs and chromatin dynamics in breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Chromatin/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans
19.
Nat Commun ; 8(1): 1849, 2017 11 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29185442

ABSTRACT

The cytokines interleukin 1ß and 6 (IL-1ß, IL-6) mediate the acute phase response (APR). In liver, they regulate the secretion of acute phase proteins. Using RNA-seq in primary hepatocytes, we show that these cytokines regulate transcription in a bifurcated manner, leading to both synergistic and antagonistic gene expression. By mapping changes in enhancer landscape and transcription factor occupancy (using ChIP-seq), we show that synergistic gene induction is achieved by assisted loading of STAT3 on chromatin by NF-κB. With IL-6 treatment alone, STAT3 does not efficiently bind 20% of its coordinated binding sites. In the presence of IL-1ß, NF-κB is activated, binds a subset of enhancers and primes their activity, as evidenced by increasing H3K27ac. This facilitates STAT3 binding and synergistic gene expression. Our findings reveal an enhancer-specific crosstalk whereby NF-κB enables STAT3 binding at some enhancers while perturbing it at others. This model reconciles seemingly contradictory reports of NF-κB-STAT3 crosstalk.


Subject(s)
Acute-Phase Reaction/genetics , Hepatocytes/physiology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Binding Sites , Cells, Cultured , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Interleukin-1beta/pharmacology , Interleukin-6/pharmacology , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , NF-kappa B/genetics , NF-kappa B/metabolism , RNA Polymerase II/genetics , RNA Polymerase II/metabolism , STAT3 Transcription Factor/genetics , STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics
20.
Nat Commun ; 8: 15896, 2017 06 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28635963

ABSTRACT

Population-based assays have been employed extensively to investigate the interactions of transcription factors (TFs) with chromatin and are often interpreted in terms of static and sequential binding. However, fluorescence microscopy techniques reveal a more dynamic binding behaviour of TFs in live cells. Here we analyse the strengths and limitations of in vivo single-molecule tracking and performed a comprehensive analysis on the intranuclear dwell times of four steroid receptors and a number of known cofactors. While the absolute residence times estimates can depend on imaging acquisition parameters due to sampling bias, our results indicate that only a small proportion of factors are specifically bound to chromatin at any given time. Interestingly, the glucocorticoid receptor and its cofactors affect each other's dwell times in an asymmetric manner. Overall, our data indicate transient rather than stable TF-cofactors chromatin interactions at response elements at the single-molecule level.


Subject(s)
Molecular Imaging/methods , Receptors, Steroid/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Animals , Chromatin/metabolism , Corticosterone/pharmacology , DNA Helicases/metabolism , Fluorescent Dyes/chemistry , Fluorescent Dyes/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Mice , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Protein Interaction Mapping , Rats , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/analysis , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/genetics , Receptors, Glucocorticoid/metabolism , Receptors, Steroid/analysis , Receptors, Steroid/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Single-Cell Analysis/methods , Time Factors , Transcription Factor AP-1/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...