Pacing of Specialized Conduction System.

Right ventricular pacing for bradycardia remains the mainstay of pacing therapy. Chronic right ventricular pacing may lead to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. We focus on the anatomy of the conduction system and the clinical feasibility of pacing the His bundle and/or left bundle conduction system. We review the hemodynamics of conduction system pacing, the techniques to capture the conduction system and the electrocardiogram and pacing definitions of conduction system capture. Clinical studies of conduction system pacing in the setting of atrioventricular block and after AV junction ablation are reviewed and the evolving role of conduction system pacing is compared with biventricular pacing.

Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging technique to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but its feasibility and safety in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block is hardly investigated. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with an indication for CRT comparing pacing parameters and complication rates of LBBAP-CRT in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) over a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 55/60 enrolled patients (92%), among which 25(45%) were elderly. In both groups, LBBAP significantly reduced the QRS duration (elderly group: 168 ± 15 ms to 136 ± 12 ms, p < 0.0001; younger group: 166 ± 14 ms to 134 ± 11 ms, p < 0.0001) and improved LVEF (elderly group: 28 ± 5% to 40 ± 7%, p < 0.0001; younger group: 29 ± 5% to 41 ± 8%, p < 0.0001). The pacing threshold was 0.9 ± 0.8 V in the elderly group vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 V in the younger group (p = 0.350). The R wave was 9.5 ± 3.9 mV in elderly patients vs. 10.7 ± 2.7 mV in younger patients (p = 0.341). The fluoroscopic (elderly: 13 ± 7 min vs. younger: 11 ± 7 min, p = 0.153) and procedural time (elderly: 80 ± 20 min vs. younger: 78 ± 16 min, p = 0.749) were comparable between groups. Lead dislodgement occurred in 2(4%) patients, 1 in each group (p = 1.000). Intraprocedural septal perforation occurred in three patients (5%), 2(8%) in the elderly group (p = 0.585). One patient (2%) in the elderly group had a pocket infection. CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP is a feasible and safe technique for delivering physiological pacing in elderly patients who are candidates for CRT with suitable pacing parameters and low complication rates.

Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing has limited efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiologic pacing option. Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of LBBAP in HF patients with RBBB and reduced left ventricular systolic function, and indication for CRT or ventricular pacing. Methods: LBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, RBBB, HF, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Procedural, pacing, and electrocardiographic parameters; clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class); and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in ejection fraction) to LBBAP were assessed. Results: LBBAP was attempted in 121 patients and successful in 107 (88%). Patient characteristics included age 74 ± 12 years, female 25%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49%, and ejection fraction 35% ± 9%. QRS axis at baseline was normal in 24%, left axis 63%, right axis 13%. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.8 ± 0.3 V @ 0.5 ms and 10 ± 9 mV at implant and remained stable during mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months. LBBAP resulted in narrowing of QRS duration (156 ± 20 ms to 150 ± 24 ms (P = .01) with R-wave peak times in V6 of 85 ± 16 ms. LVEF improved from 35% ± 9% to 43% ± 12% (P < .01). Clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively. Female sex and reduction in QRS duration with LBBAP were predictive of echocardiographic response and super-response. Conclusion: LBBAP is a feasible alternative to deliver CRT or physiologic ventricular pacing in patients with RBBB, HF, and LV dysfunction.

Multifaceted Left Bundle Branch Block: What Are the Mechanisms?

Understanding different mechanisms of aberrant conduction is critical to better evaluate the need for cardiac pacing. Aberrant conduction is caused by 4 distinct electrophysiologic mechanisms: phase 3 block, acceleration-dependent block, phase 4 block, and concealed transseptal conduction. This case offers a unique opportunity to review all aberrant conduction mechanisms in the same patient. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Pacing of Specialized Conduction System.

Right ventricular pacing for bradycardia remains the mainstay of pacing therapy. Chronic right ventricular pacing may lead to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. We focus on the anatomy of the conduction system and the clinical feasibility of pacing the His bundle and/or left bundle conduction system. We review the hemodynamics of conduction system pacing, the techniques to capture the conduction system and the electrocardiogram and pacing definitions of conduction system capture. Clinical studies of conduction system pacing in the setting of atrioventricular block and after AV junction ablation are reviewed and the evolving role of conduction system pacing is compared with biventricular pacing.

Autonomic Modulation for Treatment of Repolarization Alternans and Refractory Ventricular Electrical Storm.

Macroscopic T-wave alternans (TWA) is a rare finding on surface electrocardiogram and has been associated with an increased risk of impending sudden cardiac death. We highlight a case of macroscopic TWA in a patient with markedly prolonged QTc interval preceding ventricular electrical storm, which was refractory to medical management. Autonomic modulation of the stellate ganglion resulted in improvement in both TWA and QTc interval. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Electrocardiographic characteristics and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias originating from the basal inferoseptal area.

AIMS: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the basal inferoseptal (BIS) area are rare and can pose unique challenges during catheter ablation (CA) due to the anatomic complexity. The study sought to describe the electrocardiographic and clinical characteristics of VAs originating from the BIS area. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with VAs and successful ablation at the BIS area from 2016 to 2020 were included. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), intracardiac findings, and outcomes were analysed. Of 482 patients with VAs referred for CA, 17 (3.5%) had successful ablation at BIS area. There were 12 males, mean age was 66.7 ± 9 years, 82% had ejection fraction <50%. Mean baseline premature ventricular complex burden was 28.6 ± 9%. All patients had a leftward superior axis. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) with early transition in V2 was noted in eight patients and right bundle branch block (RBBB) in nine patients. Detailed mapping of the right ventricle (RV) was performed in 15 patients (88%), coronary sinus (CS)/middle cardiac vein (MCV) in 13 (76%), right atrium (RA) adjacent to the inferoseptal process (ISP) of left ventricle (LV) in 5 (29%), ISP-LV in 13 (76%), and epicardium in 2 (12%). Successful ablation site was in LV in 10 (59%), RV in 2 (12%), CS/MCV in 1 (6%), RA in 1 (6%), and epicardium in 2 (12%). Fifteen patients (88%) required mapping in at least two chambers (range 2-5) and seven patients (41%) required ablation in at least two chambers (range 2-3). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular arrhythmias originating in the BIS are uncommon. The most common ECG patterns were leftward superior axis, LBBB with transition in V2 or RBBB. The VA foci can be endocardial or epicardial and meticulous mapping/ablation from multiple chambers is often required to eliminate these foci successfully.

Safety and feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing following valvular interventions: Multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with valvular interventions. METHODS: Eighty-four patients were included in this study. All patients underwent recent surgical or percutaneous valvular interventions. LBBAP was attempted in all patients. Implant success rates, peri- and postprocedure electrocardiogram, pacing parameters, and complications were assessed at implant, and during follow-up. RESULTS: LBBAP implantation was successful in 80/84 (95%) patients. Mean age was 74.1 ± 13.8 years and 56% patients were male. Prior valvular replacements included: percutaneous aortic (26), surgical aortic (36), combined surgical aortic plus mitral (6), MVR (10), tricuspid (1), and pulmonic (1). Average LVEF was 52.6 ± 11%. Majority of patients underwent LBBAP due to atrioventricular block (76%) and sinus node disease (13%). Total procedure duration was 74.1 ± 12.5 min and fluoroscopic duration was 9.7 ± 6.8 min. Pacing parameters were stable during follow-up period of 10.0 ± 6.3 months. Pacing QRS duration was significantly narrower than baseline QRS duration (131.5 ± 31.4 ms vs. 114.3 ± 13.7 ms, p < .001, respectively). No acute complications were observed. Mean follow-up was 10.0 ± 6.3 months (median: 8.4 months, min: 1 and max: 24 months). During follow-up, there were three device infections and two patients had loss of LBBA capture within 1 month of implant. CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP is a feasible and safe pacing modality in patients with prior interventions for valvular heart disease.

An Unusual Complication of Transseptal Puncture.

The interatrial septum is a structure with complex embryological development. The true atrial septum is a circumscribed structure, and transgression outside of this area during transseptal puncture may result in entry into the extracardiac space or aorta that may result in a pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Impact of His bundle pacing on right ventricular performance in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND: His-Bundle pacing (HBP) is an emerging technique for physiological pacing. However, its effects on right ventricle (RV) performance are still unknown. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with an indication for pacemaker (PM) implantation to compare HBP versus RV pacing (RVP) effects on RV performance. Patients were evaluated before implantation and after 6 months by a transthoracic echocardiogram. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (age 75.1±7.9 years, 64% male) were enrolled, 42 patients (50%) underwent successful HBP, and 42 patients (50%) apical RVP. At follow up, we found a significant improvement in RV-FAC (Fractional Area Change)% [baseline: HBP 34 IQR (31-37) vs. RVP 33 IQR (29.7-37.2),p = .602; 6-months: HBP 37 IQR (33-39) vs. RVP 30 IQR (27.7-35), p < .0001] and RV-GLS (Global Longitudinal Strain)% [baseline: HBP -18 IQR (-20.2 to -15) vs. RVP -16 IQR (-18.7 to -14), p = .150; 6-months: HBP -20 IQR(-23 to -17) vs. RVP -13.5 IQR (-16 to -11), p < .0001] with HBP whereas RVP was associated with a significant decline in both parameters. RVP was also associated with a significant worsening of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (p < .0001) and S wave velocity (p < .0001) at follow up. Conversely from RVP, HBP significantly improved pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) [baseline: HBP 38 IQR (32-42) mmHg vs. RVP 34 IQR (31.5-37) mmHg,p = .060; 6-months: HBP 32 IQR (26-38) mmHg vs. RVP 39 IQR (36-41) mmHg, p < .0001] and tricuspid regurgitation (p = .005) irrespectively from lead position above or below the tricuspid valve. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PM implantation, HBP ensues a beneficial and protective impact on RV performance compared with RVP.

Spectrum of arrhythmogenic substrate post minimally invasive maze surgery in patients with recurrent.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in minimally invasive surgical ablation (MISA) have focused on improving pulmonary vein isolation. Additional ablation targets have been developed (such as posterior wall isolation). The mid- and long-term effects of current techniques (including electrophysiologic findings and recurrent arrhythmia mechanisms) have not previously been reported. METHODS: Twenty eight patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias after bipolar clamp ablation of the pulmonary vein antrum, ganglionated plexi, posterior wall isolation (roof and floor lines to create a posterior box), and ligament of Marshall ligation/cauterization and left atrial appendage clipping underwent follow up electrophysiology study including left atrial mapping an average of 2.3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation was the most common recurrent arrhythmia (n = 18) followed by micro-reentrant atrial tachycardia (n = 5), macro-reentry left atrial flutter (n = 3), and typical cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter (n = 2). Eighty six of 112 (77%) PVs mapped were electrically isolated, 16 (57%) patients had all four pulmonary veins (PVs) isolated. The posterior wall (PW) was completely isolated in only four (14%) patients, seven (25%) patients had normal PW voltage, while 17 (61%) patients had abnormal delayed or fractionated electrograms in the posterior wall (incomplete isolation). Abnormal PW electrograms were more frequently found in patients with complex recurrent left atrial arrhythmia (micro-reentry or left atrial macro-reentry flutter). CONCLUSION: With current surgical techniques PV isolation has improved, but PW isolation remains challenging. Incomplete PW isolation may produce arrhythmogenic substrate.

Outcomes of Premature Ventricular Contraction-Cardiomyopathy in the Veteran Population: A Secondary Analysis of the CHF-STAT Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the rate and outcomes of premature ventricular contractions (PVC)-cardiomyopathy from the CHF-STAT (Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure) trial, a population with cardiomyopathy (left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction of <40%) and frequent PVCs (>10 PVCs per hour). BACKGROUND: PVCs are associated with heart failure and PVC-cardiomyopathy. The prevalence of PVC-cardiomyopathy and outcome benefits of PVC suppression are not clear. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the CHF-STAT study was performed to compare the rate of successful PVC suppression (≥80% PVC reduction), LV recovery (defined as improvement in LV ejection fraction of ≥10% points), and PVC-cardiomyopathy between amiodarone and placebo groups at 6 months. PVC-cardiomyopathy was defined if both PVC reduction of ≥80% and LV ejection fraction improvement of ≥10% were present at 6 months. Cardiac events (death or resuscitated cardiac arrest) were compared between PVC-cardiomyopathy versus non-PVC-cardiomyopathy during a 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: The rates of successful PVC suppression and LV recovery were significantly higher in the amiodarone (72% and 39%, respectively) when compared to the placebo group (12% and 16%, respectively; p < 0.001), regardless of cardiomyopathy etiology. PVC-cardiomyopathy was present in 29% and 1.8% of patients in the amiodarone and placebo groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Similar PVC-cardiomyopathy rates were found in ischemic (24% amiodarone vs. 2% placebo; p < 0.001) and nonischemic populations (41% amiodarone vs. 1.5% placebo; p < 0.001). Death and resuscitated cardiac arrest were significantly lower in patients with PVC-cardiomyopathy and those treated with amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of PVC-cardiomyopathy in the CHF-STAT study was significant regardless of ischemic substrate (29%, overall population; 41%, nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Treatment of PVC-cardiomyopathy with amiodarone is likely to improve survival in this high-risk population.

Imaging-Based Localization of His Bundle Pacing Electrodes: Results From the Prospective IMAGE-HBP Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the correlation between His bundle (HB) pacing (HBP) implantation characteristics, lead-tip location, and association of intraprocedural His recordings with approximated HB anatomic landmarks using computed tomography (CT) imaging. BACKGROUND: HBP continues to grow in clinical practice due to offering true physiological pacing. However, a clear understanding of HB anatomy and the lead-tip location's influence on pacing characteristics is lacking. METHODS: The IMAGE-HBP study (Imaging Study of Lead Implant for His Bundle Pacing) was a prospective, multicenter study designed to assess implantation characteristics of the SelectSecure Model 3830 lead placed at the HB, evaluate protocol-specified HBP success (His recording present on electrogram and HBP threshold ≤2.5 V at 1 ms), and correlation between lead-tip location by CT imaging and HBP characteristics as well as lead-related complications through 12 months. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients underwent a lead implantation attempt at the HB. Of these, 61 patients (88%) had a lead successfully implanted at the HB, and 52 patients (75%) met the pre-specified definition of successful HBP. In 51 patients with CT imaging, 11 leads (22%) were placed in the atrial aspect of the HB region (36% selective HBP), and 40 leads (78%) were placed in the ventricular aspect (28% selective HBP). Four of the 51 patients had P-wave oversensing, all with leads in the atrium. Freedom from lead-related complication at 12 months was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Successful HBP could be achieved at lead-tip locations in the atrium or ventricle but is preferable in the ventricle to eliminate risk of oversensing. The IMAGE-HBP study offers better insight into approximated HB anatomic landmarks, lead-tip location, and correlation with pacing characteristics. (Imaging Study of Lead Implant for His Bundle Pacing [IMAGE-HBP]; NCT03294317).

Intermediate-term performance and safety of His-bundle pacing leads: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The short-term safety, feasibility, and performance of His-bundle pacing (HBP) leads have been reported; however, their longer-term performance beyond 1 year remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the intermediate-term performance and safety of HBP. METHODS: All HBP lead implants at Virginia Commonwealth University between January 2014 and January 2019 were analyzed. HBP was performed using a Medtronic SelectSecure 3830-69 cm pacing lead. RESULTS: Of 295 attempts, successful HBP implantation (selective or nonselective) was seen in 274 cases (93%). Mean follow-up duration was 22.8 ± 19.5 months (median 19.5; interquartile range 11-33). Mean age was 69 ± 15 years; 58% were males; and ejection fraction <50% was noted in 30%. Indications for pacemaker included sick sinus syndrome in 41%, atrioventricular block in 36%, cardiac resynchronization therapy in 7%, and refractory atrial fibrillation in 15%. Selective HBP was achieved in 33%. Mean HBP capture threshold at implant was 1.1 ± 0.9 V at 0.8 ± 0.2 ms, which significantly increased at chronic follow-up to 1.7 ± 1.1 V at 0.8 ± 0.3 ms (P <.001). Threshold was ≥2.5 V in 24% of patients, and 28% had an increase in HBP threshold ≥1 V. Loss of His-bundle capture at follow-up (septal right ventricular pacing) was seen in 17%. There was a total of 31 (11%) lead revisions, primarily for unacceptably high thresholds. CONCLUSION: Although HBP can prevent or improve pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, the elevated capture thresholds, loss of His-bundle capture, and lead revision rates at intermediate follow-up are of concern. Longer-term follow-up data from multiple centers are needed.