The economic and clinical impact of fast- versus slow-setting cement in primary total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: New bone cement products have been developed attempting to shorten their setting time and thus cut down time in the operating room. This study determines whether faster-setting bone cement shortens time in the operating room, and whether the quantity used compromises postoperative TKA outcomes. Additionally, this study looks at cost analyses of the quantity of bone cement used in TKA procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and sixty patients at a single institution with primary TKA surgeries between January 2019 and December 2021, and a clinic follow-up of at least one year, were identified. Five cement products used in this time period were identified and categorized by fast- or slow-setting products if their set times were marketed below or above six minutes, respectively. RESULTS: Estimated blood loss was higher in patients receiving fast-setting cements (160.0 vs 126.4 mL; p = 0.0009); however, operative time showed no difference between the cohorts (88.2 vs 89.2 min; p = 0.99). Fewer bags of cement were used for the fast cohort (1.3 vs 1.8 bags; p < 0.0001). The fast group was significantly cheaper on average per patient only when comparing between antibiotic bone cements (p = 0.007). No differences were found in postoperative outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found in operative times between the fast and slow cemented groups. Fewer bags of faster-setting cement only proved cost saving relative to other antibiotic bone cements studied. Nonetheless, decreased usage of fast cement did not result in any different postoperative outcomes compared to slow cements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Bilateral Femoral Shaft Fractures in a Young Child due to Nonaccidental Trauma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Introduction: Bilateral femoral diaphyseal fractures in children due to nonaccidental trauma (NAT) are a rare occurrence, with no reported cases currently published in the literature. The authors present a case of an 8-month-old male who presented with bilateral femoral shaft fractures. History, physical examination, and radiographic findings support NAT as the cause of his injuries. Due to the patient's size and associated comorbidities, he was initially treated with Pavlik harness placement, rather than spica casting. The patient demonstrated appropriate radiographic evidence of fracture healing on follow-up. Case Report: An 8-month-old male with a complex past medical history presents to the emergency department. Per the patient's mother, he has been demonstrating a progressive loss of movement and refusal to bear weight in his bilateral lower extremities over the preceding 1-2 weeks. Other injuries include facial bruising and lesions indicative of subconjunctival hemorrhages. After orthopedics was consulted, the decision was made to treat the patient's bilateral femoral shaft fractures with a Pavlik harness, rather than spica casting, due to his small size and associated past medical history. The patient was subsequently discharged under foster care. Follow-up visit demonstrates appropriate fracture healing in the bilateral femoral diaphyses. Conclusion: Many cases of NAT in the pediatric population are initially missed. Orthopedic providers must maintain a high index of suspicion for NAT as many of these patients will present with musculoskeletal injuries. The authors report a rare case of NAT in a male child resulting in bilateral femoral diaphyseal fractures. The patient was successfully treated through Pavlik harness placement. Orthopedic providers should consider Pavlik harness placement as a viable option even for young children >6 months of age presenting with femoral shaft fractures if spica casting or open reduction internal fixation is not appropriate.

Perioperative multimodal analgesic injection for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery.

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study compared postoperative as-needed (PRN) opioid consumption pre and postimplementation of a perioperative multimodal analgesic injection composed of ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketorolac, and morphine in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Secondary outcomes include pain score measurements, time to ambulation, length of stay, blood loss, 90-day complication rate, operating room time, nonopioid medication usage, and total inpatient medication cost before and after the initiation of this practice. METHODS: Consecutive patients weighing ≥ 20 kg who underwent PSF for a primary diagnosis of AIS between January 2017 and December 2020 were included. Data from 2018 were excluded to account for standardization of the practice. Patients treated in 2017 only received PCA. Patients treated in 2019 and 2020 only received the injection. Excluded were patients who had any diagnoses other than AIS, allergies to any of the experimental medications, or who were nonambulatory. Data were analyzed utilizing the two-sample t-test or Chi-squared test as appropriate. RESULTS: Results of this study show that compared with 47 patients treated postoperatively with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), 55 patients treated with a multimodal perioperative injection have significantly less consumption of PRN morphine equivalents (0.3 mEq/kg vs. 0.5 mEq/kg; p = 0.02). Furthermore, patients treated with a perioperative injection have significantly higher rates of ambulation on postoperative day 1 compared with those treated with PCA (70.9 vs. 40.4%; p = 0.0023). CONCLUSION: Administration of a perioperative injection is effective and should be considered in the perioperative protocol in patients undergoing PSF for AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

A Review of Pediatric Heel Pain.

The objective of this review article is to provide orthopaedic surgeons and general practitioners a reference and guidance for the evaluation and workup of heel pain in pediatric patients. The authors performed a comprehensive literature search to review the etiologies and management of heel pain in patients <18 years of age. Relevant studies in Medline/PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 3, 2022 using medical subject headings and text words without limitations on language or study type. The initial search utilized the following Boolean operators: (children) AND (heel pain); (pediatric) AND (heel pain). Heel pain in the pediatric population is usually a benign condition. Sever's apophysitis is the most common etiology of heel pain in pediatric patients. Most causes of heel pain in the pediatric population do not require imaging or extensive workup. However, providers must maintain a high index of suspicion for symptoms that could indicate a more severe pathology.

Institutional performance and validation of severity of illness score for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis.

A scoring system has recently been published that uses parameters within the first 4-5 days of hospitalization to determine the severity of illness (SOI) in children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO). To our knowledge, no additional studies to date have examined the validity of the SOI score outside of the institution of origin. This study evaluates the performance of the SOI score in a retrospective cohort of cases at our institution. Patients admitted to our institution over the past 5 years with AHO who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. Parameters including C reactive protein over the first 96 h of hospitalization, febrile days on antibiotics, ICU admission, and presence of disseminated disease were used to calculate the SOI score for each patient. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used when appropriate. SOI score comparison between groups was achieved with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Seventy-four patients were analyzed. Significantly higher SOI scores were noted for patients with bacteremia, ICU admission, fever for two or more days on presentation, multiple surgeries, and any complication. Markers of disease severity that significantly correlated with SOI score were total length of stay, LOS, duration of antibiotic course, number of surgical procedures, and case mix index. The SOI score functioned well as higher scores were associated with sicker patients. The SOI score is helpful for determining which patients will require longer hospitalizations and more intense treatment in a setting other than the institution of origin.

Comparison of nonoperative versus operative management in pediatric gustilo-anderson type I open tibia fractures.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest pediatric Gustilo-Anderson type I fractures, especially of the upper extremity, may be adequately treated without formal operative debridement, though few tibial fractures have been included in these studies. The purpose of this study is to provide initial data suggesting whether Gustilo-Anderson type I tibia fractures may be safely treated nonoperatively. METHODS: Institutional retrospective review was performed for children with type I tibial fractures managed with and without operative debridement from 1999 through 2020. Incomplete follow-up, polytrauma, and delayed diagnosis of greater than 12 h since the time of injury were criteria for exclusion. Data including age, sex, mechanism of injury, management, time-to-antibiotic administration, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria and were followed to union. Average age was 9.9 ± 3.7 years. All patients were evaluated in the emergency department and received intravenous antibiotics within 8 h of presentation. Median time-to-antibiotics was 2 h. All patients received cefazolin except one who received clindamycin at an outside hospital and subsequent cephalexin. Three patients (8.8%) received augmentation with gentamicin. Twenty-one patients (63.6%) underwent operative irrigation and debridement (I&D), and of those, sixteen underwent surgical fixation of their fracture. Twelve (36.4%) patients had bedside I&D with saline under conscious sedation, with one requiring subsequent operative I&D and intramedullary nailing. Three infections (14.3%) occurred in the operative group and none in the nonoperative group. Complications among the nonoperative patients include delayed union (8.3%), angulation (8.3%), and refracture (8.3%). Complications among the operative patients include delayed union (9.5%), angulation (14.3%), and one patient experienced both (4.8%). Other operative group complications include leg-length discrepancy (4.8%), heterotopic ossification (4.8%), and symptomatic hardware (4.8%). CONCLUSION: No infections were observed in a small group of children with type I tibia fractures treated with bedside debridement and antibiotics, and similar non-infectious complication rates were observed relative to operative debridement. This study provides initial data that suggests nonoperative management of type I tibial fractures may be safe and supports the development of larger studies.

Pediatric fractures following implant removal: A systematic review.

Objectives: To evaluate the available literature for postoperative fracture rates following implant removal in the pediatric population. Methods: A systematic review of articles in the PubMed and Embase computerized literature databases from January 2000 to June 2022 was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, cohort studies (retrospective and prospective), and case series involving pediatric patients that included data on fracture rate following removal of orthopedic implants were eligible for review. Two authors independently extracted data from selected studies for predefined data fields for implant type, anatomic location of the implant, indication for implantation, fracture or refracture rate following implant removal, mean time to implant removal, and mean follow-up time. Results: Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Reported fracture rates following implant removal vary based on several factors, with an overall reported incidence of 0%-14.9%. The available literature did not offer sufficient data for conduction of a meta-analysis. Conclusion: Our systematic review demonstrates that fracture following implant removal in pediatric patients is a relatively frequent complication. In children, the forearm and femur are the most commonly reported sites of fracture following removal of implants. Traumatic fractures treated definitively with external fixation have the highest reported aggregate rate of refracture. Knowledge of the incidence of this risk is important for orthopedic surgeons. There remains a need for well-designed studies and trials to further clarify the roles of the variables that contribute to this complication.